Nunn Kristen, Arbel Yael, Vallila-Rohter Sofia
Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(7):1195-1221. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2267780. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
Feedback is a fundamental aspect of aphasia treatments. However, learning from feedback is a cognitively demanding process. At the most basic level, individuals must detect feedback and extract outcome-related information (i.e., feedback processing). Neuroanatomical and neuropsychological differences associated with post-stroke aphasia may influence feedback processing and potentially how people with aphasia (PWA) respond to feedback-based treatments. To better understand how post-stroke aphasia affects feedback-based learning, the current study leverages event-related potentials (ERPs) to (1) characterize the relationship between feedback processing and learning, (2) identify cognitive skills that are associated with feedback processing, and (3) identify behavioural correlates of feedback-based learning in PWA.
Seventeen PWA completed a feedback-based novel word learning task. Feedback processing was measured using the feedback-related negativity (FRN), an ERP hypothesized to reflect the detection and evaluation of outcomes communicated via feedback. Individuals also completed neuropsychological assessments of language (phonological processing, verbal short-term memory) and executive functioning.
PWA elicited an FRN that was sensitive to feedback valence. The magnitude of the FRN was not associated with novel word learning but was strongly correlated with performance on another feedback-based task, the Berg Card Sort. Cognitive variables (information updating, selective attention) but not language variables were associated with novel word learning.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: For PWA, feedback processing may be associated with learning in some but not all feedback-based contexts. These findings may inform future research in determining which variables moderate the relationship between feedback processing and learning with the long-term goal of identifying how feedback can be modified to support successful learning during aphasia rehabilitation.
反馈是失语症治疗的一个基本方面。然而,从反馈中学习是一个认知要求较高的过程。在最基本的层面上,个体必须检测反馈并提取与结果相关的信息(即反馈处理)。与中风后失语症相关的神经解剖学和神经心理学差异可能会影响反馈处理,并可能影响失语症患者(PWA)对基于反馈的治疗的反应。为了更好地理解中风后失语症如何影响基于反馈的学习,本研究利用事件相关电位(ERP)来(1)描述反馈处理与学习之间的关系,(2)识别与反馈处理相关的认知技能,以及(3)识别PWA中基于反馈的学习的行为相关性。
17名PWA完成了一项基于反馈的新单词学习任务。使用反馈相关负波(FRN)来测量反馈处理,FRN是一种ERP,据推测它反映了通过反馈传达的结果的检测和评估。个体还完成了语言(语音处理、言语短期记忆)和执行功能的神经心理学评估。
PWA诱发了对反馈效价敏感的FRN。FRN的幅度与新单词学习无关,但与另一项基于反馈的任务——伯格卡片分类任务的表现密切相关。认知变量(信息更新、选择性注意)而非语言变量与新单词学习相关。
对于PWA来说,反馈处理可能在某些但并非所有基于反馈的情境中与学习相关。这些发现可能为未来的研究提供参考,以确定哪些变量调节反馈处理与学习之间的关系,其长期目标是确定如何修改反馈以支持失语症康复期间的成功学习。