• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用开放获取数据集评估息肉检测模型的临床疗效。

Assessing clinical efficacy of polyp detection models using open-access datasets.

作者信息

Marchese Aizenman Gabriel, Salvagnini Pietro, Cherubini Andrea, Biffi Carlo

机构信息

Cosmo Intelligent Medical Devices, Dublin, Ireland.

Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;14:1422942. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422942. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1422942
PMID:39148908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11324571/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ensuring accurate polyp detection during colonoscopy is essential for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent advances in deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have shown promise in enhancing endoscopists' performances. Effective CADe systems must achieve high polyp detection rates from the initial seconds of polyp appearance while maintaining low false positive (FP) detection rates throughout the procedure.

METHOD

We integrated four open-access datasets into a unified platform containing over 340,000 images from various centers, including 380 annotated polyps, with distinct data splits for comprehensive model development and benchmarking. The REAL-Colon dataset, comprising 60 full-procedure colonoscopy videos from six centers, is used as the fifth dataset of the platform to simulate clinical conditions for model evaluation on unseen center data. Performance assessment includes traditional object detection metrics and new metrics that better meet clinical needs. Specifically, by defining detection events as sequences of consecutive detections, we compute per-polyp recall at early detection stages and average per-patient FPs, enabling the generation of Free-Response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) curves.

RESULTS

Using YOLOv7, we trained and tested several models across the proposed data splits, showcasing the robustness of our open-access platform for CADe system development and benchmarking. The introduction of new metrics allows for the optimization of CADe operational parameters based on clinically relevant criteria, such as per-patient FPs and early polyp detection. Our findings also reveal that omitting full-procedure videos leads to non-realistic assessments and that detecting small polyp bounding boxes poses the greatest challenge.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates how newly available open-access data supports ongoing research progress in environments that closely mimic clinical settings. The introduced metrics and FROC curves illustrate CADe clinical efficacy and can aid in tuning CADe hyperparameters.

摘要

背景

在结肠镜检查期间确保准确检测息肉对于预防结直肠癌(CRC)至关重要。基于深度学习的计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统的最新进展已显示出提高内镜医师表现的潜力。有效的CADe系统必须在息肉出现的最初几秒内实现高息肉检测率,同时在整个过程中保持低假阳性(FP)检测率。

方法

我们将四个开放获取的数据集整合到一个统一平台,该平台包含来自各个中心的超过340,000张图像,其中包括380个标注的息肉,并进行了不同的数据划分,以用于全面的模型开发和基准测试。包含来自六个中心的60个全流程结肠镜检查视频的REAL-Colon数据集被用作该平台的第五个数据集,以模拟临床情况,用于对未知中心数据进行模型评估。性能评估包括传统的目标检测指标和更符合临床需求的新指标。具体而言,通过将检测事件定义为连续检测的序列,我们计算早期检测阶段的每个息肉召回率和每位患者的平均FP数,从而生成自由响应接收器操作特征(FROC)曲线。

结果

使用YOLOv7,我们在所提出的数据划分上训练和测试了多个模型,展示了我们用于CADe系统开发和基准测试的开放获取平台的稳健性。新指标的引入允许根据临床相关标准(如每位患者的FP数和早期息肉检测)优化CADe操作参数。我们的研究结果还表明,省略全流程视频会导致不现实的评估,并且检测小息肉边界框是最大的挑战。

结论

本研究展示了新可用的开放获取数据如何在紧密模拟临床环境的情况下支持正在进行的研究进展。引入的指标和FROC曲线说明了CADe的临床疗效,并有助于调整CADe超参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/40a2689a7c4f/fonc-14-1422942-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/18153f90c291/fonc-14-1422942-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/a6995120a64f/fonc-14-1422942-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/40a2689a7c4f/fonc-14-1422942-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/18153f90c291/fonc-14-1422942-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/a6995120a64f/fonc-14-1422942-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/11324571/40a2689a7c4f/fonc-14-1422942-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing clinical efficacy of polyp detection models using open-access datasets.使用开放获取数据集评估息肉检测模型的临床疗效。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;14:1422942. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422942. eCollection 2024.
2
Frame-by-Frame Analysis of a Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Polyp Detection System in Full-Length Colonoscopies.全长结肠镜中商用人工智能息肉检测系统的逐帧分析。
Digestion. 2022;103(5):378-385. doi: 10.1159/000525345. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
A video based benchmark data set (ENDOTEST) to evaluate computer-aided polyp detection systems.基于视频的基准数据集(ENDOTEST),用于评估计算机辅助息肉检测系统。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov;57(11):1397-1403. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2085059. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Establishment and validation of a computer-assisted colonic polyp localization system based on deep learning.基于深度学习的计算机辅助结肠息肉定位系统的建立与验证。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 21;27(31):5232-5246. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i31.5232.
5
Development and evaluation of a deep learning model to improve the usability of polyp detection systems during interventions.开发和评估深度学习模型,以提高介入期间息肉检测系统的可用性。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Jun;10(5):477-484. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12235. Epub 2022 May 5.
6
Polyp detection algorithm can detect small polyps: Ex vivo reading test compared with endoscopists.息肉检测算法能够检测出小息肉:与内镜医师相比的体外阅片测试。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):162-169. doi: 10.1111/den.13670. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Comparing the number and relevance of false activations between 2 artificial intelligence computer-aided detection systems: the NOISE study.比较两个人工智能计算机辅助检测系统之间假阳性激活的数量和相关性:噪声研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 May;95(5):975-981.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
8
A computer-aided system improves the performance of endoscopists in detecting colorectal polyps: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial.计算机辅助系统可提高内镜医师检测大肠息肉的性能:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 24;10:1341259. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1341259. eCollection 2023.
9
Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems.多种计算机辅助息肉检测系统的直接比较。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):63-69. doi: 10.1055/a-2147-0571. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
10
Assessment of the role of false-positive alerts in computer-aided polyp detection for assistance capabilities.评估计算机辅助息肉检测中假阳性警报在辅助能力方面的作用。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;39(8):1623-1635. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16615. Epub 2024 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
REAL-Colon: A dataset for developing real-world AI applications in colonoscopy.REAL-Colon:用于开发结肠镜检查中真实世界 AI 应用的数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 May 25;11(1):539. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03359-0.
2
Assessing generalisability of deep learning-based polyp detection and segmentation methods through a computer vision challenge.通过计算机视觉挑战赛评估基于深度学习的息肉检测和分割方法的泛化能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):2032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52063-x.
3
Sources of performance variability in deep learning-based polyp detection.
深度学习基息肉检测中性能变异性的来源。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023 Jul;18(7):1311-1322. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-02936-9. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
A Review of the Technology, Training, and Assessment Methods for the First Real-Time AI-Enhanced Medical Device for Endoscopy.首款用于内窥镜检查的实时人工智能增强型医疗设备的技术、培训及评估方法综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;10(4):404. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040404.
5
Negative Samples for Improving Object Detection-A Case Study in AI-Assisted Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection.用于改进目标检测的负样本——以人工智能辅助结肠镜息肉检测为例
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;13(5):966. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050966.
6
Current and future implications of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.人工智能在结肠镜检查中的当前及未来影响
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar-Apr;36(2):114-122. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0781. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Gorilla in the room: Even experts can miss polyps at colonoscopy and how AI helps complex visual perception tasks.显而易见的问题:即使是专家在结肠镜检查时也可能漏诊息肉,以及人工智能如何助力复杂的视觉感知任务。
Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Feb;55(2):151-153. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
8
Performance and attitudes toward real-time computer-aided polyp detection during colonoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in the United States.美国一家大型三级转诊中心在结肠镜检查中使用实时计算机辅助息肉检测的性能和态度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jul;98(1):100-109.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
9
Framework and metrics for the clinical use and implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms into endoscopy practice: recommendations from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Artificial Intelligence Task Force.将人工智能算法临床应用及实施于内镜检查实践的框架与指标:美国胃肠内镜学会人工智能特别工作组的建议
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May;97(5):815-824.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.016. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
A multi-centre polyp detection and segmentation dataset for generalisability assessment.用于泛化能力评估的多中心息肉检测和分割数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 6;10(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01981-y.