Suppr超能文献

美国一家大型三级转诊中心在结肠镜检查中使用实时计算机辅助息肉检测的性能和态度。

Performance and attitudes toward real-time computer-aided polyp detection during colonoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jul;98(1):100-109.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Computer-aided detection (CADe) has been shown to improve polyp detection in clinical trials. Limited data exist on the impact, utilization, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy in daily clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved CADe device for polyp detection in the United States and the attitudes toward its implementation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing colonoscopy at a tertiary center in the United States before and after a real-time CADe system was made available. The decision to activate the CADe system was at the discretion of the endoscopist. An anonymous survey was circulated among endoscopy physicians and staff at the beginning and conclusion of the study period regarding their attitudes toward AI-assisted colonoscopy.

RESULTS

CADe was activated in 52.1% of cases. Compared with historical control subjects, there was no statistically significant difference in adenomas detected per colonoscopy (1.08 vs 1.04, P = .65), even after excluding diagnostic and therapeutic indications and cases where CADe was not activated (1.27 vs 1.17, P = .45). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in adenoma detection rate (ADR), median procedure, and withdrawal times. Survey results demonstrated mixed attitudes toward AI-assisted colonoscopy, of which main concerns were high number of false-positive signals (82.4%), high level of distraction (58.8%), and impression it prolonged procedure time (47.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

CADe did not improve adenoma detection in daily practice among endoscopists with high baseline ADRs. Despite its availability, AI-assisted colonoscopy was only activated in half of the cases, and multiple concerns were raised by staff and endoscopists. Future studies will help elucidate the patients and endoscopists that would benefit most from AI-assisted colonoscopy.

摘要

背景与目的

计算机辅助检测(CADe)已被证明可提高临床试验中的息肉检测率。目前在日常临床实践中,关于人工智能(AI)辅助结肠镜检查的影响、利用率和态度方面的相关数据有限。我们旨在评估首个获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的用于检测息肉的 CADe 设备在美国的有效性及其实施的态度。

方法

我们对一家美国三级中心前瞻性维护的数据库中的患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在实时 CADe 系统可用前后接受了结肠镜检查。启用 CADe 系统的决定由内镜医生自行决定。在研究期间开始和结束时,我们向内镜医师和工作人员分发了一份关于他们对 AI 辅助结肠镜检查态度的匿名调查。

结果

CADe 在 52.1%的病例中被激活。与历史对照相比,每例结肠镜检查中检测到的腺瘤数量没有统计学上的显著差异(1.08 比 1.04,P =.65),甚至在排除诊断和治疗适应证以及 CADe 未被激活的病例后也没有统计学上的显著差异(1.27 比 1.17,P =.45)。此外,腺瘤检出率(ADR)、中位数手术和退出时间均无统计学差异。调查结果表明,人们对 AI 辅助结肠镜检查的态度存在分歧,主要关注点包括假阳性信号数量多(82.4%)、干扰程度高(58.8%)以及印象其延长了手术时间(47.1%)。

结论

在基线 ADR 较高的内镜医生中,CADe 并未提高日常实践中的腺瘤检出率。尽管 CADe 已在临床应用,但仅在一半的病例中被激活,并且工作人员和内镜医生提出了多种担忧。未来的研究将有助于阐明最受益于 AI 辅助结肠镜检查的患者和内镜医生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验