Farley Jason E, Beuchamp Geetha, Bergman Alanna, Hughes James P, Batey D Scott, Del Rio Carlos, Raifman Julia, Lowensen Kelly, Gamble Theresa, Remien Robert H, Beyrer Chris
The Center for Infectious Disease and Nursing Innovation Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.
Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Seattle, WA.
Stigma Health. 2024 Aug;9(3):400-410. doi: 10.1037/sah0000413. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Persistent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use reduces the risk of HIV infection, yet uptake lags among those with the greatest need. Sexual identity stigma may be a significant barrier to PrEP awareness and use among high-risk communities. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether sexual identity was related to PrEP awareness and use. This multi-site HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) study (HPTN 078) focuses on men who have sex with men (MSM) (n=335) who were HIV-negative at screening. The majority of participants were non-white (62.1%), younger than 35 (57.9%), single (79.1%), and aware of PrEP, yet had never taken PrEP (52.5%). Participants completed questionnaires including sexual history and identity; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) community engagement; PrEP awareness and use; and several measures of sexual identity stigma including family and friend stigma, general societal stigma, and anticipated healthcare stigma. Univariate and multinomial logistic regression models helped to determine factors associated with PrEP awareness and use. There were stark disparities in PrEP awareness comparing Black and White participants; 50% of Black participants reported being PrEP unaware vs 11.8% of White participants. In this sample, gay sexual identity (compared to bisexual identity) was associated with increased PrEP awareness (AOR 6.66) and use (AOR 16.9). Additionally, 29% of the association between sexual orientation and PrEP use was mediated through internalized stigma. Given low PrEP uptake among MSM, interventions that address sexual identity stigma may motivate greater PrEP uptake.
持续进行暴露前预防(PrEP)可降低感染艾滋病毒的风险,但在最有需求的人群中,其使用率仍然滞后。性取向歧视可能是高危社区中PrEP知晓率和使用率的重大障碍。本研究的主要目的是确定性取向是否与PrEP知晓率和使用率相关。这项多中心的艾滋病预防试验网络(HPTN)研究(HPTN 078)聚焦于在筛查时艾滋病毒呈阴性的男男性行为者(MSM)(n = 335)。大多数参与者为非白人(62.1%),年龄小于35岁(57.9%),单身(79.1%),知晓PrEP,但从未使用过PrEP(52.5%)。参与者完成了包括性史和性取向、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿(LGBTQ)社区参与度、PrEP知晓率和使用率,以及包括家庭和朋友歧视、一般社会歧视和预期医疗歧视在内的多项性取向歧视测量指标的问卷调查。单变量和多项逻辑回归模型有助于确定与PrEP知晓率和使用率相关的因素。在PrEP知晓率方面,黑人和白人参与者之间存在明显差异;50%的黑人参与者表示不知道PrEP,而白人参与者中这一比例为11.8%。在这个样本中,同性性取向(与双性恋性取向相比)与更高的PrEP知晓率(优势比6.66)和使用率(优势比16.9)相关。此外,性取向与PrEP使用之间29%的关联是通过内化歧视介导的。鉴于男男性行为者中PrEP使用率较低,解决性取向歧视的干预措施可能会促使更多人使用PrEP。