Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Center for Gender Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2020 Mar;132:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105999. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
The objective of this study was to quantify sexual orientation differences in insurance access, healthcare utilization, and unmet needs for care. We analyzed cross-sectional data from three longitudinal U.S.-based cohorts (N = 31,172) of adults ages 20-54 years in the Growing Up Today Studies 1 and 2 and the Nurses' Health Study 3 from 2015 to 2019. Adjusted log-binomial models examined sexual orientation differences (reference: completely heterosexual) in insurance access, healthcare utilization, and unmet needs for care. Compared to completely heterosexuals, mostly heterosexual and bisexual adults were more likely to report emergency departments as a usual source of care and less likely to be privately insured. Sexual minorities (mostly heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian) were also more likely than completely heterosexuals to delay needed care for reasons of not wanting to bother a healthcare provider, concerns over cost/insurance, bad prior healthcare experiences, and being unable to get an appointment. Differences by sex and sexual orientation also emerged for healthcare utilization and unmet needs. For example, mostly heterosexual women were more likely than completely heterosexual women to delay care due to perceiving symptoms as not serious enough, while gay men were less likely than lesbian women to delay for this reason. Findings indicate that sexual minorities experience disparities in unmet needs for and continuity of care. Provider education should be attentive to how perceptions, like perceived severity, can shape healthcare access in tandem with socioeconomic barriers.
本研究旨在量化性取向在保险获取、医疗保健利用和未满足的护理需求方面的差异。我们分析了 2015 年至 2019 年来自三个基于美国的纵向队列(N=31172)的成年人(年龄 20-54 岁)的横断面数据:今日成长研究 1 和 2 以及护士健康研究 3。调整后的对数二项式模型检查了保险获取、医疗保健利用和未满足的护理需求方面的性取向差异(参考:完全异性恋)。与完全异性恋者相比,大部分异性恋和双性恋成年人更有可能将急诊室作为常规医疗来源,而不太可能有私人保险。性少数群体(大部分异性恋、双性恋、同性恋/女同性恋)也比完全异性恋者更有可能因不想打扰医疗服务提供者、担心费用/保险、先前的医疗体验不佳以及无法预约而推迟需要的护理。在医疗保健利用和未满足的需求方面,性别和性取向的差异也很明显。例如,大部分异性恋女性比完全异性恋女性更有可能因认为症状不够严重而推迟护理,而男同性恋者比女同性恋者更不可能因同样的原因推迟护理。研究结果表明,性少数群体在未满足的护理需求和护理连续性方面存在差异。应该对提供者进行教育,让他们注意到像感知严重程度这样的看法如何与社会经济障碍一起影响医疗保健的获取。