Goyal Ria, Corrier Grace, Ring David, Fatehi Amirreza, Ramtin Sina
Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School - The University of Texas at Austin, 1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
PEC Innov. 2024 Jul 15;5:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100323. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
We sought to evaluate the potential reinforcement of misconceptions in websites discussing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
After removing all cookies to limit personalization, we entered "carpal tunnel syndrome" into five search engines and collected the first 50 results displayed for each search. For each of the 105 unique websites, we recorded publication date, author background, and number of views. The prevalence of potential reinforcement and/or reorientation of misconceptions for each website was then scored using a rubric based on our interpretation of the best current evidence regarding CTS. The informational quality of websites was graded with the DISCERN instrument, a validated tool for assessing online health information.
Every website contained at least one potentially misleading statement in our opinion. The most common misconceptions reference "excessive motion" and "inflammation." Greater potential reinforcement of misinformation about CTS was associated with fewer page views and lower informational quality scores.
Keeping in mind that this analysis is based on our interpretation of current best evidence, potential misinformation on websites addressing CTS is common and has the potential to increase symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability via reinforcement of unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms.
The prevalence of patient-directed health information that can increase discomfort and incapability by reinforcing common unhelpful thoughts supports the need for innovations in how we develop, oversee, and evolve healthy online material.
我们试图评估在讨论腕管综合征(CTS)的网站中错误观念可能得到强化的情况。
在清除所有用于限制个性化设置的cookies之后,我们在五个搜索引擎中输入“腕管综合征”,并收集每个搜索显示的前50个结果。对于105个独特的网站中的每一个,我们记录了发布日期、作者背景和浏览量。然后,根据我们对当前关于CTS的最佳证据的解读,使用一个评分标准对每个网站错误观念可能得到强化和/或重新定位的情况进行评分。网站的信息质量用DISCERN工具进行分级,这是一个用于评估在线健康信息的经过验证的工具。
在我们看来,每个网站至少包含一条可能具有误导性的陈述。最常见的错误观念涉及“过度活动”和“炎症”。关于CTS的错误信息得到更大程度的强化与浏览量较少和信息质量得分较低相关。
请记住,本分析基于我们对当前最佳证据的解读,在讨论CTS的网站上存在的潜在错误信息很常见,并且有可能通过强化关于症状的无益想法来增加症状强度和失能程度。
通过强化常见的无益想法而可能增加不适和失能的面向患者的健康信息的普遍存在,支持了我们在开发、监督和改进健康在线材料方面进行创新的必要性。