Suppr超能文献

评估住院医师麻醉前评估表现:标准化病人方法的可靠性

Evaluating pre-anesthesia assessment performance in residency: the reliability of standardized patient methods.

作者信息

Besnier Emmanuel, Franchina Sébastien, Lefevre-Scelles Antoine, Wable Thierry, Hanouz Jean-Luc, Allard Etienne, Dureuil Bertrand, Compère Vincent

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 1;11:1342004. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1342004. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-anesthesia assessment clinic (PAC) is known to increase safety and quality in the perioperative period. However, PAC teaching during anesthesiology residency is a challenge. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of a simulation score grid using a standardized patient on the PAC performance of anesthesiology residents.

METHODS

A score grid, including the 4 components of the PAC (clinical evaluation, perioperative strategy, information and communication) was validated by a group of 5 senior anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology residents (> one year) and attending anesthesiologists were included. The same simulation sequence with the same standardized patient was conducted in a simulation dedicated consultation room. The simulation sequence was followed by a debriefing session with the 2 professors (anesthesiology and communication) and each anesthesiology resident. The main outcome was the overall grid score out of a maximum score of 300 and the correlation of this score with experience in anesthesiology residency. Secondary outcomes were individual component scores according to level of experience in anesthesiology.

RESULTS

Between October 2014 and April 2016, 109 anesthesiology residents and 16 attending anesthesiologists were included in this prospective bicentric study. There was a positive correlation ( < 0.01) between level of experience and overall score on the grid score (Pearson's Coefficient = 0.52). The Pearson correlation coefficient between overall assessment and level of experience in anesthesiology was 0.46 ( < 0.01). The analysis of the sub-scores for the 4 components of the overall score (evaluation, perioperative strategy, information and communication) also identify differences between groups of experience.

CONCLUSION

Standardized patient Simulation of PAC seems to be a reliable tool to assess PAC performance in anesthesiology residents and senior anesthesiologists. These results suggest standardized patient simulation could be used as a teaching tool for PAC.

摘要

背景

术前麻醉评估诊所(PAC)已知可提高围手术期的安全性和质量。然而,麻醉学住院医师培训期间的PAC教学是一项挑战。本研究的目的是使用标准化患者评估模拟评分网格对麻醉学住院医师PAC表现的可靠性。

方法

一个包括PAC的4个组成部分(临床评估、围手术期策略、信息与沟通)的评分网格由一组5名资深麻醉师进行了验证。纳入了麻醉学住院医师(>1年)和主治麻醉师。在一个专门的模拟咨询室中,对同一标准化患者进行相同的模拟流程。模拟流程之后是与两位教授(麻醉学和沟通学)以及每位麻醉学住院医师进行的总结会议。主要结果是最高分为300分的总体网格评分以及该评分与麻醉学住院医师培训经验的相关性。次要结果是根据麻醉学经验水平的各个组成部分评分。

结果

在2014年10月至2016年4月期间,109名麻醉学住院医师和16名主治麻醉师纳入了这项前瞻性双中心研究。经验水平与网格评分的总体评分之间存在正相关(<0.01)(Pearson系数=0.52)。总体评估与麻醉学经验水平之间的Pearson相关系数为0.46(<0.01)。对总体评分的4个组成部分(评估、围手术期策略、信息与沟通)的子评分分析也发现了经验组之间的差异。

结论

PAC的标准化患者模拟似乎是评估麻醉学住院医师和资深麻醉师PAC表现的可靠工具。这些结果表明标准化患者模拟可作为PAC的教学工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/11324484/17851f5560e5/fmed-11-1342004-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating pre-anesthesia assessment performance in residency: the reliability of standardized patient methods.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 1;11:1342004. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1342004. eCollection 2024.
4
Anesthesiology Residents' Experiences and Perspectives of Residency Training.
Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1120-1128. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005316.
7
Resident Physicians Improve Nontechnical Skills When on Operating Room Management and Leadership Rotation.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):300-307. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001687.
8
Simulation-based assessment of pediatric anesthesia skills.
Anesthesiology. 2011 Dec;115(6):1308-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318238bcf6.
10
Determinants, associations, and psychometric properties of resident assessments of anesthesiologist operating room supervision.
Anesth Analg. 2013 Jun;116(6):1342-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828d7218. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluation of the Duration of Preanesthesia Consultation: Prospective and Multicenter Study.
Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):496-504. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005889.
4
Preoperative analgesic instruction and prescription reduces early home pain after outpatient surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;69(8):1033-1041. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02023-0. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Assessing communication skills during OSCE: need for integrated psychometric approaches.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02552-8.
6
Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what you want.
Med Teach. 2018 Dec;40(12):1208-1213. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1390214. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
Preoperative Evaluation Clinic Visit Is Associated with Decreased Risk of In-hospital Postoperative Mortality.
Anesthesiology. 2016 Aug;125(2):280-94. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001193.
8
Patient preference for the pre-anesthesia evaluation: Telephone versus in-office assessment.
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.040. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验