Besnier Emmanuel, Franchina Sébastien, Lefevre-Scelles Antoine, Wable Thierry, Hanouz Jean-Luc, Allard Etienne, Dureuil Bertrand, Compère Vincent
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 1;11:1342004. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1342004. eCollection 2024.
Pre-anesthesia assessment clinic (PAC) is known to increase safety and quality in the perioperative period. However, PAC teaching during anesthesiology residency is a challenge. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of a simulation score grid using a standardized patient on the PAC performance of anesthesiology residents.
A score grid, including the 4 components of the PAC (clinical evaluation, perioperative strategy, information and communication) was validated by a group of 5 senior anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology residents (> one year) and attending anesthesiologists were included. The same simulation sequence with the same standardized patient was conducted in a simulation dedicated consultation room. The simulation sequence was followed by a debriefing session with the 2 professors (anesthesiology and communication) and each anesthesiology resident. The main outcome was the overall grid score out of a maximum score of 300 and the correlation of this score with experience in anesthesiology residency. Secondary outcomes were individual component scores according to level of experience in anesthesiology.
Between October 2014 and April 2016, 109 anesthesiology residents and 16 attending anesthesiologists were included in this prospective bicentric study. There was a positive correlation ( < 0.01) between level of experience and overall score on the grid score (Pearson's Coefficient = 0.52). The Pearson correlation coefficient between overall assessment and level of experience in anesthesiology was 0.46 ( < 0.01). The analysis of the sub-scores for the 4 components of the overall score (evaluation, perioperative strategy, information and communication) also identify differences between groups of experience.
Standardized patient Simulation of PAC seems to be a reliable tool to assess PAC performance in anesthesiology residents and senior anesthesiologists. These results suggest standardized patient simulation could be used as a teaching tool for PAC.
术前麻醉评估诊所(PAC)已知可提高围手术期的安全性和质量。然而,麻醉学住院医师培训期间的PAC教学是一项挑战。本研究的目的是使用标准化患者评估模拟评分网格对麻醉学住院医师PAC表现的可靠性。
一个包括PAC的4个组成部分(临床评估、围手术期策略、信息与沟通)的评分网格由一组5名资深麻醉师进行了验证。纳入了麻醉学住院医师(>1年)和主治麻醉师。在一个专门的模拟咨询室中,对同一标准化患者进行相同的模拟流程。模拟流程之后是与两位教授(麻醉学和沟通学)以及每位麻醉学住院医师进行的总结会议。主要结果是最高分为300分的总体网格评分以及该评分与麻醉学住院医师培训经验的相关性。次要结果是根据麻醉学经验水平的各个组成部分评分。
在2014年10月至2016年4月期间,109名麻醉学住院医师和16名主治麻醉师纳入了这项前瞻性双中心研究。经验水平与网格评分的总体评分之间存在正相关(<0.01)(Pearson系数=0.52)。总体评估与麻醉学经验水平之间的Pearson相关系数为0.46(<0.01)。对总体评分的4个组成部分(评估、围手术期策略、信息与沟通)的子评分分析也发现了经验组之间的差异。
PAC的标准化患者模拟似乎是评估麻醉学住院医师和资深麻醉师PAC表现的可靠工具。这些结果表明标准化患者模拟可作为PAC的教学工具。