Blitz Jeanna D, Kendale Samir M, Jain Sudheer K, Cuff Germaine E, Kim Jung T, Rosenberg Andrew D
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Anesthesiology. 2016 Aug;125(2):280-94. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001193.
As specialists in perioperative medicine, anesthesiologists are well equipped to design and oversee the preoperative patient preparation process; however, the impact of an anesthesiologist-led preoperative evaluation clinic (PEC) on clinical outcomes has yet to be fully elucidated. The authors compared the incidence of in-hospital postoperative mortality in patients who had been evaluated in their institution's PEC before elective surgery to the incidence in patients who had elective surgery without being seen in the PEC.
A retrospective review of an administrative database was performed. There were 46 deaths from 64,418 patients (0.07%): 22 from 35,535 patients (0.06%) seen in PEC and 24 from 28,883 patients (0.08%) not seen in PEC. After propensity score matching, there were 13,964 patients within each matched set; there were 34 deaths (0.1%). There were 11 deaths from 13,964 (0.08%) patients seen in PEC and 23 deaths from 13,964 (0.16%) patients not seen in PEC. A subanalysis to assess the effect of a PEC visit on deaths as a result of failure to rescue (FTR) was also performed.
A visit to PEC was associated with a reduction in mortality (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.96, P = 0.04) by comparison of the matched cohorts. The FTR subanalysis suggested that the proportion of deaths attributable to an unanticipated surgical complication was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.141).
An in-person assessment at the PEC was associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality. It was difficult to draw conclusions about whether a difference exists in the proportion of FTR deaths between the two cohorts due to small sample size.
作为围手术期医学专家,麻醉医生具备设计和监督术前患者准备流程的充分能力;然而,由麻醉医生主导的术前评估诊所(PEC)对临床结局的影响尚未完全阐明。作者将择期手术前在其机构的PEC接受评估的患者的院内术后死亡率与未在PEC接受评估而进行择期手术的患者的死亡率进行了比较。
对一个管理数据库进行回顾性分析。64418例患者中有46例死亡(0.07%):在PEC接受评估的35535例患者中有22例死亡(0.06%),未在PEC接受评估的28883例患者中有24例死亡(0.08%)。在倾向得分匹配后,每个匹配组中有13964例患者;有34例死亡(0.1%)。在PEC接受评估的13964例(0.08%)患者中有11例死亡,未在PEC接受评估的13964例(0.16%)患者中有23例死亡。还进行了一项亚分析,以评估PEC就诊对因抢救失败(FTR)导致的死亡的影响。
通过对匹配队列的比较,PEC就诊与死亡率降低相关(比值比,0.48;95%可信区间,0.22至0.96,P = 0.04)。FTR亚分析表明,两组之间因意外手术并发症导致的死亡比例无显著差异(P = 0.141)。
在PEC进行面对面评估与院内死亡率降低相关。由于样本量小,难以得出两组之间FTR死亡比例是否存在差异的结论。