Dhumey Tapan, Bhalerao Nikhil, Paul Amreesh, Wanjari Dnyanshree
Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):e64625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64625. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Background A common knee joint disorder is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which often requires surgery. Proper pain control after the surgery facilitates fast recovery and prevents chronic pain. To provide analgesia for knee procedures, the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and regional techniques are commonly employed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). Methodology This prospective interventional study included 30 participants scheduled for patellar graft ACLR. They were assigned into groups, i.e., ACB and FNB, with 15 patients each. The evaluation occurred one day before the operation, and all surgical procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia. During the postoperative period, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to quantify pain intensity at the end of the surgery and at various intervals after the surgery. Patients with a VAS score greater than 4 received either FNB or ACB using bupivacaine 0.125%. Duration of analgesia time, power of quadriceps muscle, and neurologic complications were documented. Results No statistically significant value was observed in the mean duration of analgesia between the patients in ACB (348.33 minutes) and the patients in FNB (363.06 minutes). No motor block was observed in 12 patients who received ACB, while only four patients had a motor-sparing effect among those who received FNB. No neurological adverse effects were observed in the study participants. Conclusions ACB provides an equal duration of analgesia similar to FNB, and ACB significantly spares motor strength and maintains higher quadriceps power than FNB.
常见的膝关节疾病是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤,这种损伤通常需要手术治疗。术后适当的疼痛控制有助于快速康复并预防慢性疼痛。为膝关节手术提供镇痛,常用的方法包括使用阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药和区域阻滞技术。本研究旨在评估收肌管阻滞(ACB)和股神经阻滞(FNB)在前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后疼痛管理中的疗效。
这项前瞻性干预研究纳入了30例计划进行髌腱移植ACLR的参与者。他们被分为两组,即ACB组和FNB组,每组15例患者。评估在手术前一天进行,所有手术均采用脊髓麻醉。在术后期间,使用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)在手术结束时和术后不同时间间隔量化疼痛强度。VAS评分大于4分的患者使用0.125%布比卡因接受FNB或ACB。记录镇痛时间、股四头肌力量和神经并发症。
ACB组患者(348.33分钟)和FNB组患者(363.06分钟)之间的平均镇痛持续时间未观察到统计学显著差异。接受ACB的12例患者未观察到运动阻滞,而接受FNB的患者中只有4例具有运动保留效应。研究参与者未观察到神经不良反应。
ACB提供的镇痛持续时间与FNB相似,并且ACB显著保留运动力量,比FNB维持更高的股四头肌力量。