• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lessons on the use of real-world data in medical device research: findings from the National Evaluation System for Health Technology Test-Cases.医疗器械研究中真实世界数据应用的经验教训:国家卫生技术评估实例研究评价系统的研究结果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Sep;13(9):e240078. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0078. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Use of Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Approval and Coverage of Medical Devices: A Landscape Assessment.利用真实世界证据进行医疗器械的监管批准和覆盖范围评估:景观评估。
Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1792-1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
3
Real-world data: a comprehensive literature review on the barriers, challenges, and opportunities associated with their inclusion in the health technology assessment process.真实世界数据:纳入卫生技术评估过程中相关障碍、挑战和机遇的全面文献综述。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2024 Feb 28;27:12302. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2024.12302. eCollection 2024.
4
Real-world evidence: perspectives on challenges, value, and alignment of regulatory and national health technology assessment data collection requirements.真实世界证据:对监管和国家卫生技术评估数据收集要求的挑战、价值和一致性的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Feb 24;37:e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000131.
5
Use of real-world data and evidence for medical devices: a qualitative study of key informant interviews.医疗器械真实世界数据和证据的应用:关键信息提供者访谈的定性研究
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec;36(6):579-584. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000859. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
A systematic review of real-world evidence (RWE) supportive of new drug and biologic license application approvals in rare diseases.真实世界证据(RWE)在罕见病新药和生物制品申请批准中的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 12;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03111-2.
7
Use of real-world evidence in regulatory decisions for rare diseases in the United States-Current status and future directions.利用真实世界证据支持美国罕见病监管决策:现状与未来方向
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1213-1218. doi: 10.1002/pds.4962. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
Comparison of two assessments of real-world data and real-world evidence for regulatory decision-making.两种用于监管决策的真实世界数据和真实世界证据评估方法的比较。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13702. doi: 10.1111/cts.13702.
9
Real-world data to support post-market safety and performance of embolization coils: evidence generation from a medical device manufacturer and data institute partnership.支持栓塞线圈上市后安全性和性能的真实世界数据:医疗器械制造商和数据研究所合作产生的证据。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02659-0.
10
Use of Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Standards for Real-world Data: Expert Perspectives From a Qualitative Delphi Survey.临床数据交换标准协会(CDISC)标准在真实世界数据中的应用:来自定性德尔菲调查的专家观点
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e30363. doi: 10.2196/30363.

引用本文的文献

1
The Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) as a Real-World Data Source for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.医疗保健综合研究数据库(HIRD)作为药物流行病学研究的真实世界数据源。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70110. doi: 10.1002/pds.70110.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.评估电子健康记录中的真实世界数据用于健康技术评估:SUITABILITY 清单:ISPOR 工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2024 Jun;27(6):692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.019.
2
Determining the value of the abdominal core health quality collaborative to support regulatory decisions.确定腹部核心健康质量合作组织的价值,以支持监管决策。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1137-1144. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02990-5. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Consequences of a Health System Not Knowing Which Patients Are Deceased.医疗系统不知道哪些患者已去世的后果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Feb 1;184(2):213-214. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6428.
4
The value of using real-world evidence as a source of clinical evidence in the European medical device regulations: a mixed methods study.利用真实世界证据作为欧洲医疗器械法规临床证据来源的价值:混合方法研究。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):149-163. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2291454. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
5
Exploring unique device identifier implementation and use for real-world evidence: a mixed-methods study with NESTcc health system network collaborators.探索独特设备标识符在真实世界证据中的实施与应用:一项与NESTcc卫生系统网络合作伙伴开展的混合方法研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Jan 23;5(1):e000167. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167. eCollection 2023.
6
Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.确定协调注册网络(CRNs)的价值:以经导管瓣膜治疗为例。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Jul 4;1(1):e000003. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000003. eCollection 2019.
7
The Medical Device Unique Device Identifier as the Single Source of Truth in Healthcare Enterprises - Roadmap for Implementation of the Clinically Integrated Supply Chain.医疗设备唯一设备标识符作为医疗保健企业的单一真相来源——临床集成供应链实施路线图。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Dec 24;14:459-467. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S344132. eCollection 2021.
8
Use of Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Approval and Coverage of Medical Devices: A Landscape Assessment.利用真实世界证据进行医疗器械的监管批准和覆盖范围评估:景观评估。
Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1792-1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.增强电子健康记录系统在实用嵌入式研究中的使用:来自 NIH 医疗保健系统研究协作中心的经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2626-2640. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab202.
10
The Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes (VISION) Coordinated Registry Network: An effort to advance evidence evaluation for vascular devices.血管植入物监测和介入治疗结局(VISION)协调注册网络:一项推进血管器械证据评估的努力。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2153-2160. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.507. Epub 2020 May 20.

医疗器械研究中真实世界数据应用的经验教训:国家卫生技术评估实例研究评价系统的研究结果。

Lessons on the use of real-world data in medical device research: findings from the National Evaluation System for Health Technology Test-Cases.

机构信息

RAND, Arlington, VA 22202, USA.

RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Sep;13(9):e240078. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0078. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0078
PMID:39150225
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11367563/
Abstract

Although the US FDA encourages manufacturers of medical devices to submit real-world evidence (RWE) to support regulatory decisions, the ability of real-world data (RWD) to generate evidence suitable for decision making remains unclear. The 2017 Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA IV), authorized the National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc) to conduct pilot projects, or 'Test-Cases', to assess whether current RWD captures the information needed to answer research questions proposed by industry stakeholders. We synthesized key lessons about the challenges conducting research with RWD and the strategies used by research teams to enhance their ability to generate evidence from RWD based on 18 Test-Cases conducted between 2020 and 2022. We reviewed study protocols and reports from each Test-Case team and conducted 49 semi-structured interviews with representatives of participating organizations. Interview transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed. Challenges that stakeholders encountered in working with RWD included the lack of unique device identifiers, capturing key data elements and their appropriate meaning in structured data, limited reliability of diagnosis and procedure codes in structured data, extracting information from unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data, limited capture of long-term study end points, missing data and data sharing. Successful strategies included using manufacturer and supply chain data, leveraging clinical registries and registry reporting processes to collect and aggregate data, querying standardized EHR data, implementing natural language processing algorithms and using multidisciplinary research teams. The Test-Cases identified numerous challenges working with RWD but also opportunities to address these challenges and improve researchers' ability to use RWD to generate evidence on medical devices.

摘要

尽管美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)鼓励医疗器械制造商提交真实世界证据(RWE)以支持监管决策,但真实世界数据(RWD)生成适合决策的证据的能力仍不清楚。2017 年医疗器械用户收费修正案(MDUFA IV)授权国家卫生技术评估协调中心(NESTcc)开展试点项目,即“测试案例”,以评估当前 RWD 是否捕获了行业利益相关者提出的研究问题所需的信息。我们综合了 18 个在 2020 年至 2022 年期间进行的测试案例中有关使用 RWD 进行研究的挑战以及研究团队为提高从 RWD 生成证据的能力而采用的策略的关键经验。我们审查了每个测试案例团队的研究方案和报告,并对参与组织的代表进行了 49 次半结构化访谈。对访谈记录进行了编码和主题分析。利益相关者在使用 RWD 时遇到的挑战包括缺乏独特的设备标识符、捕获结构化数据中的关键数据元素及其适当含义、结构化数据中诊断和程序代码的可靠性有限、从非结构化电子健康记录(EHR)数据中提取信息、长期研究终点的捕获有限、数据缺失和数据共享。成功的策略包括使用制造商和供应链数据、利用临床登记处和登记处报告流程来收集和汇总数据、查询标准化的 EHR 数据、实施自然语言处理算法以及使用多学科研究团队。测试案例确定了在使用 RWD 时遇到的许多挑战,但也为解决这些挑战和提高研究人员使用 RWD 生成医疗器械证据的能力提供了机会。