Western Washington Medical Group, Everett, WA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; and.
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Sep 1;38(9):477-483. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002860.
To identify factors that contribute to iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy during acetabular surgery through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach and to evaluate if variation among individual surgeons exists.
Retrospective cohort.
Level I trauma center.
Adults undergoing fixation of acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) through a posterior approach by 9 orthopaedic traumatologists between November 2010 and November 2022.
The prevalence of iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy and comparison of the prevalence and risk of palsy between prone and lateral positions before and after adjusting for individual surgeon and the presence of transverse fracture patterns in logistic regression. Comparison of the prevalence of palsy between high-volume (>1 patient/month) and low-volume surgeons.
A total of 644 acetabular fractures repaired through a posterior approach were included (median age 39 years, 72% male). Twenty of 644 surgeries (3.1%) resulted in iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy with no significant difference between the prone (3.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9%-4.9%) and lateral (3.3%, 95% CI, 1.3%-8.1%) positions (P = 0.64). Logistic regression adjusting for surgeon and transverse fracture pattern demonstrated no significant effect for positions (odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI, 0.3-3.9). Transverse fracture pattern was associated with increased palsy risk (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI, 1.1-7.9). Individual surgeon was significantly associated with iatrogenic palsy (P < 0.02).
Surgeon and the presence of a transverse fracture line predicted iatrogenic nerve palsy after a posterior approach to the acetabulum in this single-center cohort. Surgeons should perform the Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabular fixation in the position they deem most appropriate, as the position was not associated with the rate of iatrogenic palsy in this series.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
通过 Kocher-Langenbeck 入路确定髋臼手术中医源性坐骨神经麻痹的相关因素,并评估个体外科医生之间是否存在差异。
回顾性队列研究。
一级创伤中心。
2010 年 11 月至 2022 年 11 月期间,9 名骨科创伤医生通过后路治疗髋臼骨折(AO/OTA 62)的成年人。
医源性坐骨神经麻痹的发生率,以及在调整个体外科医生和横行骨折模式存在的情况下,俯卧位和侧卧位之间的麻痹发生率和风险的比较,以及高容量(>1 例/月)和低容量外科医生之间的麻痹发生率比较。
共纳入 644 例通过后路修复的髋臼骨折(中位年龄 39 岁,72%为男性)。20 例(3.1%)手术导致医源性坐骨神经麻痹,俯卧位(3.1%,95%置信区间[CI],1.9%-4.9%)和侧卧位(3.3%,95%CI,1.3%-8.1%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.64)。调整外科医生和横行骨折模式后的 logistic 回归显示,体位无显著影响(优势比 1.0,95%CI,0.3-3.9)。横行骨折模式与麻痹风险增加相关(优势比 3.0,95%CI,1.1-7.9)。个体外科医生与医源性麻痹显著相关(P < 0.02)。
在本单中心队列中,外科医生和横行骨折线是预测后路髋臼手术后医源性神经麻痹的因素。外科医生应根据自己认为最合适的位置进行 Kocher-Langenbeck 入路固定髋臼,因为在本系列中,该位置与医源性麻痹发生率无关。
预后 III 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。