Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Nov 15;141:112939. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112939. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
Several studies have shown that the survival outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are not inferior to surgery alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of ESCC treated with immunochemotherapy (ICT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT and to explore subgroups of patients who could benefit from one treatment strategy.
Pooled data were obtained from two prospectively registered clinical trials of patients with ESCC at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. One trial involved treatment with neoadjuvant ICT followed by surgery, while the other involved induction ICT followed by definitive CRT. To balance potential biases, we conducted an overlap weighting (OW) analysis to compare the rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to analyze failure pattern.
The median follow-up time of the survivors was 39.3 months. After overlap weighting, the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS for patients undergoing surgery and CRT were 61.5 % and 59.7 %, 67.2 % and 69.9 %, 81.3 % and 90.7 %, 84.6 % and 79.1 %, respectively (P>.05 for all). A trend for improved 2-year OS was observed in the surgery group in patients who did not respond to ICT (P=.07).
The differences in the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS between the surgery group and the chemoradiotherapy group did not reach statistical significance.
多项研究表明,在食管鳞癌(ESCC)患者中,放化疗(CRT)的生存结果并不逊于单纯手术。本研究旨在比较接受免疫化疗(ICT)后手术或根治性 CRT 治疗的 ESCC 的生存结果,并探讨可能从一种治疗策略中获益的患者亚组。
从南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院进行的两项 ESCC 前瞻性注册临床试验中获得了汇总数据。一项试验涉及新辅助 ICT 后手术治疗,另一项试验涉及诱导 ICT 后根治性 CRT。为了平衡潜在的偏倚,我们进行了重叠加权(OW)分析,以比较 2 年无进展生存率(PFS)、局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)、远处无复发生存率(DRFS)和总生存率(OS)的发生率。此外,还进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析失败模式。
幸存者的中位随访时间为 39.3 个月。经过重叠加权后,手术和 CRT 组患者的 2 年 PFS、LRRFS、DRFS 和 OS 率分别为 61.5%和 59.7%、67.2%和 69.9%、81.3%和 90.7%、84.6%和 79.1%(P>.05 均)。在未对 ICT 无反应的患者中,手术组的 2 年 OS 有改善趋势(P=.07)。
手术组和放化疗组的 2 年 PFS、LRRFS、DRFS 和 OS 率差异无统计学意义。