• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子根治性放化疗与以手术为基础的治疗在食管鳞癌中的比较:一项多中心回顾性日本队列研究。

Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):484-494. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6
PMID:38844703
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study.

METHODS

Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.

摘要

背景

质子放疗联合根治性放化疗(P-CRT)治疗食管鳞癌(ESCC)的生存结果与基于手术的治疗方法(新辅助化疗后手术治疗,NAC-S)相当,这一结果来自于单中心研究。本研究旨在日本多中心研究中验证这一结论。

方法

共有 11 家日本食管癌专业医院参与了本研究。2010 年至 2019 年间,共纳入 518 例临床分期为 I-IVA 期的 ESCC 患者,包括 168 例接受 P-CRT 和 350 例接受 NAC-S 的患者,评估了这些患者的长期生存结局。采用倾向评分加权分析,并使用重叠加权法进行混杂因素调整。

结果

P-CRT 组的 3 年总生存(OS)与 NAC-S 组相当(74.8% vs. 72.7%,风险比 [HR]:0.87,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.61-1.25)。尽管 P-CRT 组的 3 年无进展生存(PFS)劣于 NAC-S 组(51.4% vs. 59.6%,HR 1.39,95% CI 1.04-1.85),但 P-CRT 组局部进展患者的生存情况优于 NAC-S 组(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.38-0.88),这主要归因于局部进展后的挽救性手术或内镜黏膜下剥离术。P-CRT 在 cT1-2(HR 0.61,95% CI 0.29-1.26)和 c 期 I-II(HR 0.50,95% CI 0.24-1.07)亚组中的生存优势更为显著,尽管在其他人群中,如 cT3-4 和 c 期 III-IVA 中,这种趋势并不明显。

结论

质子放疗联合根治性放化疗治疗 ESCC 的生存结果与手术治疗相当。特别是对于 cT1-2 和 c 期 I-II 期的患者,质子放疗有可能成为一线治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.质子根治性放化疗与以手术为基础的治疗在食管鳞癌中的比较:一项多中心回顾性日本队列研究。
Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):484-494. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Comparison of outcomes between surgery and chemoradiotherapy after endoscopic resection for pT1a-MM with lymphovascular invasion or pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japanese multicenter propensity score-matched study.内镜下切除术后,pT1a-MM伴淋巴管侵犯或pT1b食管鳞状细胞癌患者手术与放化疗疗效比较:日本多中心倾向评分匹配研究
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan;60(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02188-7. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
Comparison between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for overall survival in patients with clinical Stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG1406-A).新辅助化疗后手术与根治性放化疗对临床II/III期食管鳞状细胞癌患者总生存期的比较(JCOG1406-A)
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;47(6):480-486. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx040.
4
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性放化疗对比新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 II 期到 III 期食管鳞癌。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2710-2721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.086. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Comparison Between Esophagectomy and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者行食管切除术与根治性放化疗的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr;107(4):1060-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.036. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.临床III期食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助化疗与先行手术加或不加化疗的比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12473.
7
Comparison of immunochemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer.局部晚期食管鳞癌免疫化疗后手术或放化疗的比较。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Nov 15;141:112939. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112939. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
8
Comparison of long-term outcomes between esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy after endoscopic resection of submucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜下切除黏膜下食管鳞癌后行食管切除术与放化疗的长期疗效比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Dec 31;32(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz023.
9
Endoscopic resection as an independent predictive factor of local control in patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study.内镜下切除作为 T1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌患者接受放化疗后局部控制的独立预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01972-6.
10
Genome-wide and size-based cell-free DNA indices as predictive biomarkers for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with preoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy.全基因组和基于大小的游离DNA指标作为术前或根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的预测生物标志物。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2021 Jun;45(3):100685. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100685. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer compared to existing treatments, including X-ray therapy and surgery.与包括X射线疗法和手术在内的现有治疗方法相比,质子束疗法用于治疗食管癌。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106767. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106767.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of particle therapy registries based on a unified treatment policy for esophageal cancer.基于食管癌统一治疗策略的粒子治疗注册分析。
J Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 16;64(Supplement_1):i16-i24. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad012.
2
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.日本食管癌学会编辑的《2022年食管癌诊疗指南》:第1部分。
Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):343-372. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
3
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial.
新辅助放化疗对比新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术治疗局部进展期食管鳞癌:一项前瞻性多中心随机临床试验。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Feb;34(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.508. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
A nationwide validation of the prognostic impact of pathological response and the distribution of recurrence patterns in responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.一项关于食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗后病理反应的预后影响及反应者复发模式分布的全国性验证研究。
Esophagus. 2023 Apr;20(2):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00962-1. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
Recurrence Pattern Comparing Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Preoperative Chemotherapy with Docetaxel plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.术前放化疗与术前多西他赛联合5-氟尿嘧啶和顺铂化疗治疗晚期食管癌的复发模式比较
Oncology. 2022;100(12):655-665. doi: 10.1159/000527196. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
6
A Single-Arm Confirmatory Study of Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Including Salvage Treatment for Clinical Stage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (JCOG0909 Study).一项关于明确放化疗(包括挽救性治疗)治疗 II/III 期食管鳞癌的单臂确证研究(JCOG0909 研究)。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Nov 1;114(3):454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗后手术与质子束根治性放化疗的回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;26(10):1856-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01981-1. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.随机化的质子束治疗与调强放射治疗局部晚期食管癌的 IIB 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1569-1579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02503. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2.日本食管癌学会编辑的《2017年食管癌诊疗指南》:第2部分
Esophagus. 2019 Jan;16(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0642-8. Epub 2018 Aug 31.