Department of International Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Sep;12(9):e1424-e1435. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00235-3.
Female sex workers remain disproportionately affected by HIV. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of risk-differentiated, peer-led support for female sex workers in Zimbabwe on the risk of HIV acquisition and HIV transmission from sex among female sex workers.
In this cluster randomised, open-label, controlled study, 22 clinics dedicated to female sex workers co-located in government health facilities throughout Zimbabwe were allocated (1:1, through restricted randomisation) to usual care or AMETHIST intervention. Usual care comprised HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), referral to government antiretroviral therapy (ART) services, contraception, condoms, syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections, health education, legal advice, and peer support. AMETHIST added peer-led microplanning tailored to individuals' risk and participatory self-help groups. All cisgender women (aged >18 years) who had sold sex within the past 30 days and lived or worked within trial cluster areas were eligible. Intervention status was not masked to programme implementers but was masked to survey teams and laboratory staff. After 28 months, a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) survey was done in the female sex worker population around each clinic, which measured the primary outcome, the combined proportion of female sex workers in the surveyed population at risk of transmitting HIV (ie, were HIV positive, not virally suppressed, and not consistently using condoms) or at risk of acquiring HIV (ie, were HIV negative and not consistently using condoms or PrEP). We report prespecified analyses of the disaggregated proportions of female sex workers in the surveyed population at risk of either transmission or acquisition of HIV. Analyses were prespecified, RDS-weighted, and age-adjusted. This trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR202007818077777.
The AMETHIST intervention was started on May 15, 2019, and data were collected from June 1, 2019, until Dec 13, 2021. The RDS survey was done from Oct 18 to Dec 13, 2021, with 2137 women included in the usual care group (11 clusters) and 2131 in the AMETHIST intervention group (11 clusters) after excluding survey seeds (n=132) and women with missing key data (n=44). 1973 (46·2%) of the 4268 female sex workers surveyed were living with HIV; of these, 863 (93·5%; RDS-adjusted) of 931 women in the intervention group and 927 (88·8%) of 1042 in the usual care group were virologically suppressed. 287 (22·4%) of 1200 HIV-negative women in the intervention group and 194 (15·7%) of 1096 in the usual care group reported currently taking PrEP, of whom only two (0·4%) of 569 had protective tenofovir diphosphate concentrations in dried blood spots (>700 fmol/dried blood punch). There was no effect of the intervention on the primary endpoint of risk of both HIV transmission and acquisition (intervention group n=1156/2131, RDS-adjusted proportion 55·3%; usual care group n=1104/2137, RDS-adjusted proportion 52·7%; age-adjusted risk difference -0·9%, 95% CI -5·7% to 3·9%, p=0·70). For the secondary outcomes, the proportion of women living with HIV at risk of transmission was low and significantly reduced in the intervention group (n=63/931, RDS-adjusted proportion 5·8%) compared with the usual care group (103/1041, 10·4%), with an age-adjusted risk difference of -5·5% (95% CI -8·2% to -2·9%, p=0·0003). Risk of acquisition among HIV-negative women was similar in the intervention (n=1093/1200, RDS-adjusted proportion 92·1%) and the usual care group (1001/1096, 92·2%), with an age-adjusted risk difference of -0·6% (95% CI -4·6 to 3·4, p=0·74).
There was no overall benefit of the intervention on combined risk of transmission or acquisition. Viral load suppression in women living with HIV was high and appeared to be further improved by AMETHIST, suggesting potential for impressive uptake and adherence to ART in vulnerable and mobile populations. Sustaining treatment and reinvigorating prevention remain crucial.
The Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
For the Shona and Ndebele translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
女性性工作者仍然受到不成比例的艾滋病毒感染影响。本研究旨在确定风险差异化、以同伴为基础的支持方案对津巴布韦女性性工作者的艾滋病毒感染风险和艾滋病毒经性传播的影响。
在这项整群随机、开放标签、对照研究中,津巴布韦政府卫生设施中专门为女性性工作者设立的 22 个诊所(通过限制随机分配)被分配到常规护理或 AMETHIST 干预组(1:1)。常规护理包括艾滋病毒检测、暴露前预防(PrEP)、转介至政府抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)服务、避孕、避孕套、性传播感染的症状管理、健康教育、法律咨询和同伴支持。AMETHIST 增加了针对个体风险的同伴主导的微观规划和参与式自助小组。所有在过去 30 天内有过性交易行为且居住或工作在试验组区域内的 18 岁以上的顺性别女性均有资格参加。方案实施者对干预情况不知情,但调查小组和实验室工作人员对此不知情。28 个月后,在每个诊所周围的女性性工作者人群中进行了应答者驱动抽样(RDS)调查,该调查衡量了主要结局,即在接受调查的人群中,有传播艾滋病毒风险(即艾滋病毒阳性、未被抑制病毒载量且未持续使用避孕套)或有感染艾滋病毒风险(即艾滋病毒阴性且未持续使用避孕套或 PrEP)的女性性工作者的比例。我们报告了预先规定的对有传播或感染 HIV 风险的女性性工作者的比例的分解分析。分析是预先规定的、RDS 加权的和年龄调整的。该试验在泛非临床试验注册中心(PACTR202007818077777)注册。
AMETHIST 干预于 2019 年 5 月 15 日开始,数据于 2019 年 6 月 1 日收集至 2021 年 12 月 13 日。RDS 调查于 2021 年 10 月 18 日至 12 月 13 日进行,共有 2137 名女性被纳入常规护理组(11 个集群),2131 名女性被纳入 AMETHIST 干预组(11 个集群),剔除了调查种子(n=132)和关键数据缺失的女性(n=44)。在接受调查的 4268 名女性性工作者中,1973 名(46.2%)携带艾滋病毒;其中,干预组的 863 名(93.5%;RDS 调整)和常规护理组的 927 名(88.8%)艾滋病毒携带者病毒载量得到抑制。干预组的 287 名(22.4%)艾滋病毒阴性女性正在服用 PrEP,而常规护理组的 194 名(15.7%),其中只有两名(0.4%)服用了具有保护作用的替诺福韦二磷酸(tenofovir diphosphate)浓度(>700 fmol/dried blood punch)。干预对主要结局(即艾滋病毒传播和感染的综合风险)没有影响,干预组 n=1156/2131,RDS 调整后比例为 55.3%;常规护理组 n=1104/2137,RDS 调整后比例为 52.7%;年龄调整后的风险差异为-0.9%,95%CI-5.7%至 3.9%,p=0.70)。对于次要结局,携带艾滋病毒的女性的传播风险比例较低,且在干预组中显著降低(n=63/931,RDS 调整后比例为 5.8%),而在常规护理组中则较高(n=103/1041,10.4%),年龄调整后的风险差异为-5.5%(95%CI-8.2%至-2.9%,p=0.0003)。艾滋病毒阴性女性的感染风险在干预组(n=1093/1200,RDS 调整后比例为 92.1%)和常规护理组(n=1001/1096,92.2%)中相似,年龄调整后的风险差异为-0.6%(95%CI-4.6%至 3.4%,p=0.74)。
干预对综合传播或感染风险没有总体影响。携带艾滋病毒的女性的病毒载量抑制率很高,并且似乎通过 AMETHIST 进一步提高,这表明在脆弱和流动的人群中,抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的使用率和依从性可能会令人印象深刻。维持治疗和重新激发预防仍然至关重要。
英国惠康信托基金会和比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。