Suppr超能文献

为什么女性性工作者会不再参与针对性的生殖健康和性健康服务?来自津巴布韦“发声姐妹”项目的经验。

Why do female sex workers disengage from targeted reproductive and sexual health services? Experiences from the Sisters with a Voice programme in Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Machingura Fortunate, Hartney Thomas, Maringwa Galven, Maguma Jasper, Mkwananzi Sikhululiwe, Chipwere Rumbidzai, Chinozvina Tariro, Matambanadzo Primrose, Madimutsa Gracious, Makamba Memory, Dirawo Jeffrey, Ali M Sanni, Bourdin Sarah, Pliakas Triantafyllos, Mpofu Amon, Mugurungi Owen, Rice Brian, Phillips Andrew, Hargreaves James R, Cowan Frances M

机构信息

Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research Zimbabwe (CeSHHAR Zimbabwe), Harare, Zimbabwe.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12870-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Sisters programme provides HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for female sex workers (FSW) in Zimbabwe. Many engage with these services only once, while others disengage after repeated visits. Little is known about reasons for disengagement and the extent of service needs after disengaging.

METHODS

Programme staff used site- and age-stratified random sampling to identify 1,200 programme records of FSWs who attended one of four Sisters clinics at least once between January 2018 and June 2019, and had no evidence of a further visit before September 2020. Outreach workers attempted to contact these FSWs via home visits, phone tracing and contacting peer educators. We calculated the proportion of FSWs successfully contacted, the level of ongoing engagement in sex work, expressed unmet need for Sisters services and the proportion of FSWs who subsequently made a return visit to the programme. We explored sociodemographic factors associated with these outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1169 FSWs for whom contact was attempted, peer educators or others provided evidence in relation to 16 FSWs thought to have died. Of the 45% (504/1169) of FSWs who were successfully contacted, 37% (188/504) were no longer engaged in sex work, although 83% (156/188) reported that they were still in need of services. Reasons given for disengaging included having migrated (40%; 200/504); work commitments (16%; 79/504) and accessing services elsewhere (10%; 51/504). 62% of FSWs (313/504) said they were still active in sex work, among whom 23% (73/313) revisited the programme within 3 months of contact. FSWs living with HIV were less likely to re-engage with the programme (adjusted odds ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.83). Age and site were associated with no longer being in sex work, while other factors showed no strong association.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for robust outreach and re-engagement strategies that accommodate the mobility and evolving circumstances of FSWs. In particular, programmes that promote peer-led, community-based microplanning—supported by integrated data management systems—can help address stigma, frequent relocation, and financial constraints that hinder continuous care. By tailoring services to both active and former FSWs, health systems can ensure that essential sexual and reproductive health services remain accessible, even when FSWs exit sex work. Such differentiated approaches ultimately strengthen continuity of care, reduce service gaps, and support broader public health goals by improving health equity and outcomes for this high-risk population.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-12870-y.

摘要

背景

“姐妹”项目为津巴布韦的女性性工作者提供艾滋病毒以及性与生殖健康服务。许多女性性工作者只使用过一次这些服务,而其他人在多次就诊后不再参与。对于不再参与的原因以及不再参与后服务需求的程度,我们知之甚少。

方法

项目工作人员采用按地点和年龄分层的随机抽样方法,从2018年1月至2019年6月期间至少在四家“姐妹”诊所中的一家就诊过一次,且在2020年9月之前没有再次就诊记录的女性性工作者的1200份项目记录中进行筛选。外展工作者试图通过家访、电话追踪和联系同伴教育者来联系这些女性性工作者。我们计算了成功联系到的女性性工作者的比例、继续从事性工作的程度、表示对“姐妹”项目服务有未满足需求的比例以及随后再次回到该项目就诊的女性性工作者的比例。我们探讨了与这些结果相关的社会人口学因素。

结果

在尝试联系的1169名女性性工作者中,同伴教育者或其他人提供了与16名被认为已死亡的女性性工作者有关的证据。在成功联系到的45%(504/1169)的女性性工作者中,37%(188/504)不再从事性工作,尽管83%(156/188)报告称她们仍需要服务。给出的不再参与的原因包括迁移(40%;200/504)、工作任务(16%;79/504)以及在其他地方获得服务(10%;51/504)。62%的女性性工作者(313/504)表示她们仍活跃在性工作中,其中23%(73/313)在被联系后的3个月内再次回到该项目。感染艾滋病毒的女性性工作者重新参与该项目的可能性较小(调整后的优势比为0.41,95%置信区间为0.20 - 0.83)。年龄和地点与不再从事性工作有关,而其他因素没有显示出强烈的关联。

结论

这些发现凸显了需要强有力的外展和重新参与策略,以适应女性性工作者的流动性和不断变化的情况。特别是,由综合数据管理系统支持的、促进同伴主导的基于社区的微观规划的项目,有助于解决阻碍持续护理的耻辱感、频繁搬迁和经济限制问题。通过为在职和离职的女性性工作者量身定制服务,卫生系统可以确保即使女性性工作者退出性工作,基本的性与生殖健康服务仍然可及。这种差异化方法最终加强了护理的连续性,减少了服务差距,并通过改善这一高危人群的健康公平性和健康结果来支持更广泛的公共卫生目标。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12913 - 025 - 12870 - y获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a87f/12225132/0e849c9e36ab/12913_2025_12870_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验