• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适宜性评估:无症状性颈动脉狭窄,包括颈动脉血运重建术。

Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.

机构信息

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, 3V, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03766; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, 3V, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03766; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.

出版信息

Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):179-187. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002
PMID:39151997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330557/
Abstract

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality randomized controlled trials and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for carotid artery revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including carotid endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

摘要

颈动脉狭窄是美国血管专家最常治疗的诊断之一。然而,颈动脉狭窄的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议,在诊断成像方式、纵向监测、药物治疗和手术干预方面存在显著差异。高质量随机对照试验和观察性研究的数据为当前的管理模式和社会指南提供了基础,这些指南为临床实践提供信息。目前,颈动脉疾病的诊断通常通过双功能超声和计算机断层扫描或磁共振血管造影等补充的横断面成像来建立,必要时提供额外的解剖信息。所有有记录的闭塞性疾病患者都应接受目标导向的药物治疗,包括抗血小板药物和降脂策略,最常见的是使用他汀类药物。那些有严重颈动脉狭窄和可接受预期寿命的患者可能会考虑进行颈动脉血运重建。介入医生应优化考虑共同决策方法,仔细权衡血管重建的利弊,并与患者共同优化知情治疗决策。在当前的实践中,有三种不同的手术选择来治疗颈动脉狭窄,包括颈动脉内膜切除术、经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和经颈动脉血运重建术。需要注意的是,虽然这些手术在大多数临床环境中经常互换使用,但它们具有技术细节和结果差异。在这篇综述中,探讨了这些话题,并围绕无症状颈动脉狭窄患者的治疗方法的适当使用概述了各种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/1c1b49738793/nihms-1983714-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/a2e02028f698/nihms-1983714-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/86a4d51f2eb7/nihms-1983714-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/1c1b49738793/nihms-1983714-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/a2e02028f698/nihms-1983714-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/86a4d51f2eb7/nihms-1983714-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e1/11330557/1c1b49738793/nihms-1983714-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.适宜性评估:无症状性颈动脉狭窄,包括颈动脉血运重建术。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):179-187. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建时代的患者决策。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):125-135.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
3
An analysis of the recommendations of the 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对 2022 年血管外科学会无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者临床实践指南建议的分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 May;79(5):1235-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.041. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Recent advances and controversial issues in the optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳管理的最新进展及争议问题
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血运重建术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的解剖适应证。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1452-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.051. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
6
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Textbook outcomes as a novel patient-centric metric to inform carotid revascularization.教科书式结局作为一种以患者为中心的新型指标,为颈动脉血运重建提供依据。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1370-1379.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.220. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
8
An International, Expert-Based Delphi Consensus Document on Controversial Issues about TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR).一份关于经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)争议问题的基于专家的国际德尔菲共识文件。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt B):42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.048. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
9
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Racial Differences in Adoption and Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization among High-Risk Adults with Carotid Artery Stenosis.高危颈动脉狭窄成人经颈动脉血管重建术的采用情况及预后的种族差异。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:370-381. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.036. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Omics Science and Social Aspects in Detecting Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes of Carotid Stenosis.检测颈动脉狭窄诊断、风险预测和结果的生物标志物的组学科学与社会方面。
Biomolecules. 2024 Aug 8;14(8):972. doi: 10.3390/biom14080972.

本文引用的文献

1
What Is the Role of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis?经颈动脉血运重建术在颈动脉狭窄治疗中的作用是什么?
NEJM Evid. 2023 Feb;2(2):EVIDtt2200178. doi: 10.1056/EVIDtt2200178. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
Decision aids for patients with carotid stenosis.颈动脉狭窄患者的决策辅助工具。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.050. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Adoption and Diffusion of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Contemporary Practice.经颈动脉血运重建术在当代实践中的采用与推广。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e012805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012805. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Temporal Trends and Determinants of Stroke Risk in Patients With Medically Treated Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄患者经治疗后发生卒中的风险的时间趋势和决定因素。
Stroke. 2023 Jul;54(7):1735-1749. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041921. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
Procedural Safety Comparison Between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Carotid Stenting: Perioperative and 1-Year Rates of Stroke or Death.经颈动脉血运重建术、颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的围手术期和 1 年卒中或死亡率的操作安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e024964. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024964. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Carotid endarterectomy or stenting or best medical treatment alone for moderate-to-severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: 5-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术或最佳药物治疗单独用于中重度无症状颈动脉狭窄:一项多中心、随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):877-888. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00290-3.
7
Updated research priorities of the Society for Vascular Surgery.血管外科学会更新的研究重点。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1432-1439.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.176. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
8
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
9
The Society for Vascular Surgery implementation document for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.血管外科学会关于颅外脑血管疾病管理的实施文件。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):26S-98S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.074. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
10
Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: A report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee.经颅多普勒速度标准优化诊断颈内动脉狭窄:报告国际社会认可委员会(IAC)血管检测司颈动脉诊断标准委员会。
Vasc Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):515-525. doi: 10.1177/1358863X211011253. Epub 2021 May 19.