Palillo Michael B, Mishkin Noah, Aydin Mert, Mourino Anthony, Ricart Arbona Rodolfo J, Lipman Neil S
Tri-Institutional Training Program in Laboratory Animal Medicine and Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and The Rockefeller University, New York, New York.
The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine; and.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2024 Aug 16;63(5):513-20. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-043.
(Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg- /SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups ( = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.
鼠柠檬酸杆菌(Cm)再次成为学术研究小鼠种群中普遍存在的细菌污染物。开展了一项研究,以评估饲养管理和笼具清洁方法在预防Cm笼间传播方面的有效性。为评估换笼期间的笼间传播情况,将一个饲养2只无Cm的瑞士韦伯斯特(SW;Tac:SW)哨兵小鼠的笼子随机放置在12个独立通风笼架中的每个架上,这些笼架位于2个动物饲养室之一,其中的饲养笼中有 shedding mice,位于2个动物饲养室之一。对研究笼子不知情的饲养人员每周使用微隔离笼技术更换动物饲养室中的所有笼子。放置后180天进行的PCR检测证实所有小鼠的Cm检测仍为阴性。为评估笼具清洁以消除Cm的有效性,我们调查了将一只无Cm的SW和NOD.Cg - /SzJ(NSG)小鼠与感染Cm的小鼠同笼饲养7天(每周重复4周)时Cm的传播情况,这些笼子被分配到3个组之一(每组 = 10对小鼠)。先前饲养2只感染Cm的BALB/c小鼠的笼子,要么在隧道清洗机中清洗(最终漂洗温度为82.2 °C [180 °F],每次运行平均16秒; = 10),清洗后有无进行高压灭菌(121 °C,20分钟; = 10),要么不进行处理(仅更换垫料; = 10)。通过PCR对每个笼子清洁前后的拭子进行Cm检测。所有预处理拭子检测呈阳性,而所有笼子(不包括仅更换垫料的笼子)的处理后拭子检测呈阴性。通过PCR检测,所有SW和NSG小鼠,无论组别如何,Cm检测均为阴性。这些发现表明,感染性Cm不会在未处理的笼子中持续存在,也不会在用或不用高压灭菌进行机械清洗后持续存在。总体而言,这些发现表明,我们的饲养方案和不足的笼具清洁方法都不太可能导致当代研究小鼠种群中观察到的Cm流行率。