• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密西西比州全州范围内一项研究对异常宫颈筛查结果后的随访阴道镜检查程序进行评估。

Evaluation of follow-up colposcopy procedures after abnormal cervical screening result across a statewide study in Mississippi.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.

School of Nursing, Mississippi State University, Meridian, MS, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Nov;35(11):1487-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01905-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-024-01905-0
PMID:39152278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11561063/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cervical screening is used to detect and treat precancers to prevent invasive cancers. However, successful prevention also requires adequate follow-up and treatment of individuals with abnormal screening results. The aim was to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up status for individuals needing colposcopy after an abnormal screening result.

METHODS

The STRIDES (Studying Risk to Improve DisparitiES) cohort comprises individuals undergoing cervical cancer screening and management at a Mississippi Health Department or University of Mississippi clinic. Follow-up status, demographics, and clinical data were assessed from electronic health records and, if necessary, patient navigation on individuals identified as needing a colposcopy after an abnormal screening.

RESULTS

Of the 1,458 individuals requiring colposcopy, 43.0% had the procedure within 4 months, 16.4% had a delayed procedure, and 39.5% had no documented colposcopy follow-up, with significant predictors of follow-up identified as age and cytology diagnosis. Individuals 30 + were more likely to have follow up with a colposcopy compared to individuals < 30 years (49% and 38.7%, respectively; p < .001). Individuals with cytology diagnoses of LSIL (52.9%), ASC-H (51.4%), and HSIL (62.3%) had higher percentages of adherence to follow-up guidelines (p < .001). In total, we found that 78% of individuals had some type of follow-up, including a repeat screening visit.

CONCLUSION

Despite high cervical cancer screening rates among Mississippians, a substantial proportion did not have adequate next-step intervention. However, it is encouraging that highest risk individuals were more likely to have a colposcopy. Regardless, continuing to understand the underlying causes for incomplete follow-up is crucial for timely secondary targeted interventions to reduce cervical cancer burden, promote awareness, and improve health outcomes.

摘要

目的

宫颈筛查用于检测和治疗癌前病变,以预防浸润性癌症。然而,成功预防还需要对异常筛查结果的个体进行充分的随访和治疗。本研究旨在调查需要行阴道镜检查的个体的人口统计学、临床特征和随访情况。

方法

STRIDES(研究风险以改善差异)队列包括在密西西比州卫生部或密西西比大学诊所接受宫颈癌筛查和管理的个体。从电子健康记录中评估了随访情况、人口统计学和临床数据,如果有必要,还通过患者导航对经异常筛查后确定需要行阴道镜检查的个体进行评估。

结果

在 1458 名需要行阴道镜检查的个体中,43.0%在 4 个月内进行了该检查,16.4%延迟了该检查,39.5%没有记录阴道镜检查的随访情况,年龄和细胞学诊断是随访的显著预测因素。30 岁及以上的个体比 30 岁以下的个体更有可能接受阴道镜检查随访(分别为 49%和 38.7%;p<0.001)。细胞学诊断为 LSIL(52.9%)、ASC-H(51.4%)和 HSIL(62.3%)的个体遵循随访指南的比例更高(p<0.001)。总的来说,我们发现 78%的个体进行了某种类型的随访,包括重复筛查就诊。

结论

尽管密西西比州的宫颈癌筛查率很高,但仍有相当一部分患者未进行充分的下一步干预。然而,令人鼓舞的是,高危个体更有可能进行阴道镜检查。无论如何,继续了解不完整随访的根本原因对于及时进行二级靶向干预以降低宫颈癌负担、提高认识和改善健康结果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/75cb8f5865c1/10552_2024_1905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/ed33637b9a3d/10552_2024_1905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/4ec8da514f15/10552_2024_1905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/75cb8f5865c1/10552_2024_1905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/ed33637b9a3d/10552_2024_1905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/4ec8da514f15/10552_2024_1905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/11561063/75cb8f5865c1/10552_2024_1905_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of follow-up colposcopy procedures after abnormal cervical screening result across a statewide study in Mississippi.密西西比州全州范围内一项研究对异常宫颈筛查结果后的随访阴道镜检查程序进行评估。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Nov;35(11):1487-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01905-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Evaluation of Follow-up Colposcopy Procedures After Abnormal Cervical Screening Result Across a Statewide Study in Mississippi.密西西比州一项全州范围研究中宫颈筛查结果异常后的后续阴道镜检查程序评估
Res Sq. 2024 Feb 13:rs.3.rs-3943646. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3943646/v1.
3
Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review.宫颈癌筛查:综述。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 8;330(6):547-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13174.
4
[Results and cost evaluation of triage with high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening. A pilot study in Piedmont (North-West Italy)].[宫颈癌筛查中高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测分诊的结果与成本评估:皮埃蒙特(意大利西北部)的一项试点研究]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Mar-Apr;36(2):88-94.
5
Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.通过宫颈管刮术对宫颈细胞学异常女性进行阴道镜检查时诊断宫颈癌前病变
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002330.
6
Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.宫颈癌筛查中初级人乳头瘤病毒检测的最佳管理策略:澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划的成本效益评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0163509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163509. eCollection 2017.
7
Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.阴道镜检查后的随访检测:阴道镜检查诊断为 CIN1 及以下病变后 5 年的 CIN2+风险。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Apr;17(5 Suppl 1):S69-77. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31828543b1.
8
STRIDES - STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES in Cervical Cancer in Mississippi - Design and baseline results of a Statewide Cohort Study.STRIDES - 研究风险以改善密西西比州宫颈癌的差异 - 一项全州队列研究的设计和基线结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106740. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106740. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Offering Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Self-Sampling among African-American Women in the Mississippi Delta.密西西比三角洲地区非裔美国女性 HPV 自我采样宫颈癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jun;30(6):1114-1121. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1673. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Effectiveness of two strategies to follow-up ASC-US and LSIL screening results in The Netherlands using repeat cytology with or without additional hrHPV testing: a retrospective cohort study.荷兰采用重复细胞学检查(无论是否附加高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测)对非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASC-US)和低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)筛查结果进行随访的两种策略的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2014 Sep;25(9):1141-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0414-2. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Failure to follow up abnormal test results associated with cervical cancer in primary and ambulatory care: a systematic review.未能跟进初级保健和门诊护理中与宫颈癌相关的异常检查结果:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11082-z.
2
A randomised controlled trial of volitional and motivational interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake.一项旨在提高宫颈癌筛查参与率的意志和动机干预随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Apr;322:115800. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115800. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
3
Medium- to long-term outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse.
经阴道辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗 III-IV 期盆腔器官脱垂的中远期疗效。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02105-1.
4
Impact of health education intervention on demand of women for cervical cancer screening: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.健康教育干预对妇女宫颈癌筛查需求的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Oct 1;23(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06765-0.
5
Effect of a female community health volunteer-delivered intervention to increase cervical cancer screening uptake in Nepal: a cluster randomized controlled trial.女性社区卫生志愿者实施的干预措施对提高尼泊尔宫颈癌筛查率的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Aug 12;29:101948. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101948. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Understanding Perceived Barriers to Colposcopy Follow-Up Among Underserved Women at an Urban Teaching Hospital: A Qualitative Study.在城市教学医院中,理解服务不足的女性对阴道镜检查随访的认知障碍:一项定性研究。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2023 Jan 1;27(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000700. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
The effectiveness of health education interventions on cervical cancer prevention in Africa: A systematic review.健康教育干预措施在非洲预防宫颈癌中的有效性:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107219. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107219. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
8
Role of colposcopy in the management of women with abnormal cytology.阴道镜检查在异常细胞学女性管理中的作用。
Cytojournal. 2022 Jun 14;19:40. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_03_15_2021. eCollection 2022.
9
Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.黑人女性与异常宫颈癌筛查随访相关的差异增加。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 16;42:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.宫颈癌筛查异常后阴道镜检查未到场:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01851-6.