• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑人女性与异常宫颈癌筛查随访相关的差异增加。

Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.

作者信息

Boitano Teresa K L, Ketch Peter, Maier Julia G, Nguyen Christine T, Huh Warner K, Michael Straughn J, Scarinci Isabel C

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 16;42:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041
PMID:35898199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9309676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether race and ethnicity impacts patient adherence to follow-up for colposcopy after abnormal cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included women that were randomly selected from patients presenting to our colposcopy clinic from 1/2019 to 12/2019. Inclusion criteria were females age ≥21 years-old and appropriate referral for colposcopy. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) ADHERENT to follow-up if they came to their first scheduled appointment; (2) DELAYED if they presented more than three months from their original referral (usually missing 1-3 appointments); and (3) NOT ADHERENT if they did not show for their appointment after referral. Analysis was performed using SPSS v.26.

RESULTS

284 women met inclusion criteria for the study. The majority of women were Black (65.2 %) followed by non-Hispanic Whites (20.0 %) and Latinx (14.8 %). Overall, 39.1 % were ADHERENT, 18.6 % were DELAYED, and 42.3 % were NOT ADHERENT. When compared with non-Hispanic White women, there was a significant difference between race/ethnicity and timing of follow-up (p = 0.03). Blacks were more likely to be NOT ADHERENT (45.9 %; p = 0.03), and Latinx and Blacks were the most likely to be DELAYED (35.7 % and 21.1 %; p = 0.03). Private insurance patients were more likely to be ADHERENT for care compared with un-/underinsured patients (78.9 vs 27.8 %, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is inadequate follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening across all races/ethnicities; however, lack of adherence is higher in Black patients. Moreover, 25% of Hispanic and Black women present in a delayed fashion. Culturally relevant assessments and interventions are needed to understand and address these gaps.

摘要

背景

确定种族和族裔是否会影响宫颈癌筛查异常后患者接受阴道镜检查随访的依从性。

方法

这项回顾性病历审查纳入了从2019年1月至2019年12月到我们阴道镜诊所就诊的患者中随机选取的女性。纳入标准为年龄≥21岁的女性且有进行阴道镜检查的适当转诊。患者被分为三类:(1)如果她们按时前来首次预约就诊,则为依从随访;(2)如果她们在原转诊后三个月以上才前来就诊(通常错过1 - 3次预约),则为延迟就诊;(3)如果她们在转诊后未按预约就诊,则为不依从。使用SPSS v.26进行分析。

结果

284名女性符合该研究的纳入标准。大多数女性为黑人(65.2%),其次是非西班牙裔白人(20.0%)和拉丁裔(14.8%)。总体而言,39.1%为依从,18.6%为延迟,42.3%为不依从。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,种族/族裔与随访时间存在显著差异(p = 0.03)。黑人更有可能不依从(45.9%;p = 0.03),拉丁裔和黑人最有可能延迟就诊(35.7%和21.1%;p = 0.03)。与未参保/参保不足的患者相比,有私人保险的患者更有可能依从治疗(78.9%对27.8%,p = 0.0001)。

结论

所有种族/族裔在宫颈癌筛查异常后的随访均不足;然而,黑人患者的不依从率更高。此外,25%的西班牙裔和黑人女性就诊延迟。需要进行与文化相关的评估和干预,以了解并解决这些差距。

相似文献

1
Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.黑人女性与异常宫颈癌筛查随访相关的差异增加。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 16;42:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Outcomes by Race Among Women Referred to an Academic Colposcopy Clinic with a Patient Navigation Program.患者导航项目下转诊至学术阴道镜检查诊所的女性的种族相关结局。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jun;30(6):902-909. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8381. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Understanding the role of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status on adherence behaviors among women with abnormal cervical cytology.了解致癌型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)状态对宫颈细胞学异常女性的依从性行为的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01168-2.
4
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
6
Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States.美国黑人和白人女性在宫颈癌筛查和随访方面的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):369-374. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in use of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of preterm birth.种族和民族差异在使用 17-α 羟孕酮己酸酯预防早产中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):374.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.054. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
10
Development of a text message-based intervention for follow-up colposcopy among predominately underserved Black and Hispanic/Latinx women.基于短信的随访阴道镜检查干预措施的开发,主要针对服务不足的黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔女性。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jun;33(6):861-873. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01573-y. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Bleeding: An Analysis of Presenting Symptoms Among Black Patients with Endometrial Cancer.出血之外:对子宫内膜癌黑人患者就诊症状的分析
Health Equity. 2025 Aug 14;9(1):375-385. doi: 10.1177/24731242251365480. eCollection 2025.
2
Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.宫颈癌人口统计学的时间趋势:一项疾病控制与预防中心WONDER数据库研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 18;15:1567305. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1567305. eCollection 2025.
3
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
4
Guideline-Concordant Surveillance After Treatment for High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia.高级别宫颈发育异常治疗后的指南一致性监测
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 1;145(5):461-468. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005877. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
5
Impact of social determinants and medical mistrust on parent-child HPV vaccination in economically disadvantaged communities: implications for cancer prevention.社会决定因素和医疗不信任对经济弱势社区亲子HPV疫苗接种的影响:对癌症预防的启示
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;14:1422839. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422839. eCollection 2024.
6
A Proposed mHealth Intervention to Address Patient Barriers to Colposcopy Attendance: Qualitative Interview Study of Clinic Staff and Patient Perspectives.一项旨在解决患者阴道镜检查就诊障碍的移动健康干预措施:针对诊所工作人员和患者观点的定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 14;9:e55043. doi: 10.2196/55043.
7
Socioeconomic Inequities in Pap Test Use Among Black Women in the United States: An Intersectional Approach.美国黑人女性巴氏试验使用中的社会经济不平等:一种交叉性方法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02148-0.
8
Evaluation of follow-up colposcopy procedures after abnormal cervical screening result across a statewide study in Mississippi.密西西比州全州范围内一项研究对异常宫颈筛查结果后的随访阴道镜检查程序进行评估。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Nov;35(11):1487-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01905-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
9
Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.推进美国宫颈癌筛查中种族公平的障碍和机遇。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7.
10
The impact of adjusting for hysterectomy prevalence on cervical cancer incidence rates and trends among women aged 30 years or older-United States, 2001-2019.调整子宫切除术患病率对 30 岁及以上女性宫颈癌发病率和趋势的影响-美国,2001-2019 年。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 5;193(8):1097-1105. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae041.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States.美国黑人和白人女性在宫颈癌筛查和随访方面的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):369-374. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Rural-Urban and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence in the United States, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年美国农村-城市和种族/民族间浸润性宫颈癌发病率的差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 6;16:E70. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180447.
3
Determinants of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up And Invasive Cervical Cancer Among Uninsured and Underinsured Women in New Jersey.新泽西州未参保和参保不足女性宫颈癌筛查异常随访及浸润性宫颈癌的决定因素
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(2):680-701. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0050.
4
Health impact of delayed implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in India: A modeling analysis.印度宫颈癌筛查项目延迟实施的健康影响:建模分析。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;144(4):687-696. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31823. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Medicaid Expansions and Cervical Cancer Screening for Low-Income Women.医疗补助计划扩大与低收入妇女的宫颈癌筛查
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2870-2891. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12732. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.服务不足的城市内城区女性巴氏涂片异常后,随访建议依从性的预测因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1353-1359. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
7
Factors involved in the delay of treatment initiation for cervical cancer patients: A nationwide population-based study.宫颈癌患者治疗起始延迟的相关因素:一项基于全国人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4568. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004568.
8
Factors Associated With Adherence to Follow-up Colposcopy.与后续阴道镜检查依从性相关的因素。
Am J Health Educ. 2013;44(6):293-298. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2013.838881.
9
Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care.患者导航研究计划中报告的乳腺和宫颈异常患者存在的障碍:对及时护理的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.010.
10
Individual, provider, and system risk factors for breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved Black, Latina, and Arab women.服务不足的黑人、拉丁裔和阿拉伯妇女的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的个体、提供者和系统风险因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Jan;23(1):57-64. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4397. Epub 2013 Nov 27.