Suppr超能文献

伴有和不伴有心房颤动的急性心力衰竭中指南指导的药物治疗的快速滴定。

Rapid Uptitration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies in Acute Heart Failure With and Without Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Athens University Hospital Attikon, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece; Physiology Lab, University of Cyprus Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Heart Initiative, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Momentum Research Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S 942 (MASCOT), Paris, France.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Nov;12(11):1845-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) before and after discharge in hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients is feasible, is safe, and improves outcomes; whether this is also true in patients with coexistent atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) is not known.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate whether rapid GDMT uptitration before and after discharge for HF is feasible, safe and beneficial in patients with and without AF/AFL.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies) trial, GDMT uptitration and patient outcomes were analyzed by AF/AFL status and type (permanent, persistent, paroxysmal).

RESULTS

Among 1,078 patients enrolled in STRONG-HF, 496 (46%) had a history of AF, including 238 assigned to high-intensity care (HIC) and 258 to usual care (UC), and 581 did not have a history of AF/AFL, including 304 assigned to HIC and 277 to UC. By day 90, the average percent optimal dose of neurohormonal inhibitors achieved in the HIC arm was similar in patients with and without AF/AFL, reaching approximately 80% of the optimal dose (average absolute difference between AF/AFL and non-AF/AFL groups: -0.81%; 95% CI: -3.51 to 1.89). All-cause death or HF readmission by day 180 occurred less frequently in the HIC than the UC arm, both in patients with and without AF (adjusted HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.48-1.19] in AF vs adjusted HR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.31-0.79] in non-AF/AFL patients; P for interaction = 0.2107). Adverse event rates were similar in patients with and without AF/AFL. AF/AFL type did not affect either uptitration or patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of acute HF patients have AF/AFL history. Rapid GDMT uptitration before and early after discharge is feasible, is safe, and may improve outcomes regardless of AF presence or type. (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies [STRONG-HF]; NCT03412201).

摘要

背景

在住院心力衰竭(HF)患者中,在出院前后快速调整指南指导的医学治疗(GDMT)是可行的、安全的,并能改善预后;但对于同时存在心房颤动/扑动(AF/AFL)的患者是否如此尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在探讨在 HF 患者中,在出院前后快速调整 GDMT 是否可行、安全和有益,以及 AF/AFL 的存在或类型是否会影响这些结果。

方法

在 STRONG-HF(通过 NT-proBNP 测试帮助下快速优化心力衰竭治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效)试验的二次分析中,根据 AF/AFL 的状态和类型(永久性、持续性、阵发性)分析 GDMT 的滴定和患者的结局。

结果

在 STRONG-HF 中纳入的 1078 例患者中,496 例(46%)有 AF 病史,其中 238 例被分配到高强度治疗(HIC)组,258 例被分配到常规治疗(UC)组,581 例没有 AF/AFL 病史,其中 304 例被分配到 HIC 组,277 例被分配到 UC 组。在第 90 天,HIC 组中神经激素抑制剂的平均最佳剂量百分比在有和没有 AF/AFL 的患者中相似,达到最佳剂量的 80%左右(AF/AFL 和非-AF/AFL 组之间的平均绝对差异:-0.81%;95%CI:-3.51 至 1.89)。在第 180 天,HIC 组的全因死亡或 HF 再入院的发生率低于 UC 组,在有和没有 AF 的患者中均如此(调整后的 HR:0.75 [95%CI:0.48-1.19]在 AF 中 vs 调整后的 HR:0.50 [95%CI:0.31-0.79]在非-AF/AFL 患者中;P 交互=0.2107)。有和没有 AF/AFL 的患者的不良事件发生率相似。AF/AFL 的类型并不影响滴定或患者的结局。

结论

近一半的急性 HF 患者有 AF/AFL 病史。在出院前后快速调整 GDMT 是可行的、安全的,并且可能改善预后,无论 AF 的存在与否或类型如何。(STRONG-HF:通过 NT-proBNP 测试帮助下快速优化心力衰竭治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效;NCT03412201)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验