Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Gullhaugveien 1, Oslo, 0484, Norway.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0812, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Nov;51(6):988-996. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01405-y. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
This study aimed to explore the reciprocal relationships between implementation leadership and practitioner implementation citizenship behavior during the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Data were collected at two timepoints with a time lag of six months during a national implementation of evidence-based treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder in Norwegian mental health clinics. Data from 72 leaders and 346 practitioners were analyzed with a two-wave cross-lagged panel model, accounting for the nested structure and adjusting for demographic variables. Significant positive autoregressive effects for both implementation leadership and implementation citizenship behavior indicated some stability in ratings across time. Significant cross-lagged effects in both directions indicated that practitioners who experienced greater implementation leadership from their leaders demonstrated greater implementation citizenship behavior six months later, and vice versa. Findings hence supported both the social exchange hypothesis and the followership hypothesis, suggesting reciprocal associations between the constructs. The findings underscore the mutually influential relationship between leaders' behavior and practitioners' engagement in citizenship behavior during EBP implementation. The study emphasizes the importance of interventions focusing on leadership behaviors that encourage practitioner engagement and mutually beneficial behavior patterns, highlighting the reciprocal and vital roles that both leaders and practitioners play in successful EBP implementation.
本研究旨在探讨在实施循证实践(EBP)过程中,实施领导力与从业者实施公民行为之间的相互关系。这项研究是在挪威心理健康诊所实施创伤后应激障碍循证治疗的全国性项目中,通过两次时间点收集数据(时间间隔为 6 个月)进行的。使用两波交叉滞后面板模型对 72 名领导者和 346 名从业者的数据进行了分析,该模型考虑了嵌套结构,并调整了人口统计学变量。实施领导力和实施公民行为都存在显著的正自回归效应,表明在整个时间内评分具有一定的稳定性。两个方向的显著交叉滞后效应表明,六个月后,经历更多来自领导的实施领导力的从业者表现出更大的实施公民行为,反之亦然。研究结果支持了社会交换假说和追随假说,表明这些结构之间存在相互关联。研究结果强调了在 EBP 实施过程中领导者行为与从业者参与公民行为之间相互影响的关系。该研究强调了关注鼓励从业者参与和互惠行为模式的领导力干预措施的重要性,突出了领导者和从业者在成功实施 EBP 方面的相互作用和至关重要的作用。