Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 0 Marine Lab Road, St. John's NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
Huntsman Marine Science Centre, 1 Lower Campus Rd, St. Andrews, New Brunswick E5B 2L7, Canada.
Aquat Toxicol. 2024 Sep;274:107047. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107047. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
Accidental oil spills into the ocean can lead to downward transport and settling of oil onto the seafloor as part of marine snow, as seen during the Deepwater Horizon incident in 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico. The arctic and subarctic regions may favor conditions leading to this benthic oil deposition, prompting questions about the potential impacts on benthic communities. This study investigated the effects of oil-contaminated marine snow uptake on the blue mussel (Mytilus sp.). We exposed mussels for four days to 1) oil-contaminated marine snow (MOS treatment), or to 2) chemically-enhanced water-accommodated fraction (CEWAF) of oil plus unaggregated food particles (CEWAF treatment). Both oil treatments received the same nominal concentration of oil and food. Two controls were included: 1) Clean seawater plus unaggregated food (agg-free control) and 2) clean seawater plus marine snow (marine snow control). After the exposure, mussels were allowed to recover for ten days under clean, running seawater. Samples were taken right before and after the exposure period, and after the recovery phase for the following endpoints: distribution (partitioning) of oil compounds between seawater and MOS, and between seawater and mussel tissue; DNA damage (assessed via the comet assay); clearance rate; and condition index [tissue dry weight (g) divided by shell length (mm)]. Some discernable patterns were found in the partitioning of oil compounds between seawater and MOS. However, these patterns did not translate to any significant differences in the partitioning of oil compounds into mussel tissue between the two oil treatments. DNA damage did not exceed background levels (10% tail DNA or less; to be expected in healthy, viable cells) at any sampling time point, but significantly higher DNA damage was observed in CEWAF-T compared to MOS-T mussels after the recovery phase. After the exposure, a significant difference emerged in the clearance rate between the CEWAF treatment and the agg-free control, but not between the MOS treatment and the marine snow control. All mussels except those from the CEWAF treatment exhibited an increased condition index after the exposure time. Together, these results suggest that aggregates could moderate the effects of oil exposure on blue mussels, possibly by providing better, more concentrated nutrition than unaggregated food particles.
意外的石油泄漏到海洋中会导致石油作为海洋雪的一部分向下运输并沉降到海底,这在 2010 年墨西哥湾的深水地平线事件中可见一斑。北极和亚北极地区可能有利于导致这种海底石油沉积的条件,这引发了对海底群落潜在影响的问题。本研究调查了受污染的海洋雪摄取对贻贝(Mytilus sp.)的影响。我们将贻贝暴露于受污染的海洋雪(MOS 处理)或化学增强的水容纳油分(CEWAF)加未聚集的食物颗粒(CEWAF 处理)中四天。两种油处理均接受相同的油和食物名义浓度。包括两个对照:1)无聚集食物的清洁海水(agg-free 对照)和 2)清洁海水加海洋雪(marine snow 对照)。暴露后,贻贝在清洁的流水海水下恢复十天。在暴露期之前和之后以及恢复阶段后采集样品,用于以下终点:1)海水和 MOS 之间以及海水和贻贝组织之间油化合物的分布(分配);2)DNA 损伤(通过彗星试验评估);3)清除率;和 4)条件指数[组织干重(g)除以壳长(mm)]。在海水和 MOS 之间油化合物的分配中发现了一些明显的模式。然而,这些模式并没有转化为两种油处理之间油化合物进入贻贝组织的分配中的任何显著差异。在任何采样时间点,DNA 损伤都未超过背景水平(<10%的尾部 DNA,在健康、有活力的细胞中预期),但在恢复阶段后,CEWAF-T 贻贝的 DNA 损伤明显高于 MOS-T 贻贝。暴露后,CEWAF 处理与 agg-free 对照之间的清除率出现显著差异,但 MOS 处理与 marine snow 对照之间没有差异。暴露后,所有贻贝(CEWAF 处理除外)的状况指数均增加。总的来说,这些结果表明,与未聚集的食物颗粒相比,聚集物可能会减轻石油暴露对贻贝的影响,可能是通过提供更好、更集中的营养。