Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Poult Sci. 2024 Nov;103(11):104163. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104163. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Objective, robust, and repeatable assessments of fear responses of poultry can lead to improvements in research techniques, the validity of test results, and ultimately bird welfare. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of 2 different holding methods on broiler fear responses during the inversion test, a standardized method of assessing fear in poultry. On D15 and D34 mixed-sex broilers (N = 80) were inverted and held either by their shanks (N = 40) or feet (N = 40) at arm's length away from the experimenter for 30 s. The frequency of wing flapping, head movement, attempts to right, and vocalizations were observed from video recordings collected during the inversion test. Vocalizations at D15 and D34 were not different when comparing holding methods. Frequency of attempts to right and wing flapping at D15 were greater (P < 0.001) for birds held by their feet (0.90 and 16.6, respectively) than when they were held by their shanks (0.20 and 0.73, respectively). Similarly, on D34 wing flapping remained greater (P < 0.001) for birds held by their feet (23.8) compared to their shanks (8.1). Conversely, head movements were greater (P = 0.05) for birds held by their shanks (9.2) compared to their feet (6.3) on D15. Within both the shank and feet holding method, vocalizations at D15 were greater (30.7 and 35.6, respectively) compared to D34 (11.93 and 15.38, respectively) (P < 0.001). There was no holding method effect on head movements within each age. These results suggest that behaviors observed during the inversion test can be influenced by the inversion holding method and that handling should be standardized while conducting behavioral tests to assess fear in poultry.
客观、稳健且可重复的禽类恐惧反应评估可改进研究技术、提高试验结果的有效性,并最终改善禽类福利。本研究旨在探讨在倒置试验中,两种不同的持鸡方法对肉鸡恐惧反应的影响,该试验是评估禽类恐惧的标准化方法。在第 15 天和第 34 天,将混合性别肉鸡(N = 80)倒置,以手臂长度将鸡的跗关节(N = 40)或脚部(N = 40)握住并悬空 30 秒。在倒置试验过程中从视频记录中观察翅膀拍打、头部运动、试图站立和发声的频率。在比较持鸡方法时,第 15 天和第 34 天的发声没有差异。第 15 天,脚部持鸡的尝试站立和翅膀拍打频率更高(P < 0.001),分别为 0.90 和 16.6,而跗关节持鸡的分别为 0.20 和 0.73。同样,第 34 天,脚部持鸡的翅膀拍打频率仍更高(P < 0.001),为 23.8,而跗关节持鸡的为 8.1。相反,第 15 天,跗关节持鸡的头部运动更大(P = 0.05),为 9.2,而脚部持鸡的为 6.3。在跗关节和脚部持鸡方法中,第 15 天的发声均高于第 34 天(分别为 30.7 和 35.6,P < 0.001),而第 34 天的分别为 11.93 和 15.38。该研究结果表明,倒置试验中观察到的行为可能受到倒置持鸡方法的影响,在进行评估禽类恐惧的行为试验时,应标准化处理方法。