• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肉鸡倒提试验握持方法的比较。

A comparison of inversion test holding methods for broilers.

机构信息

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2024 Nov;103(11):104163. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104163. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104163
PMID:39153269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471087/
Abstract

Objective, robust, and repeatable assessments of fear responses of poultry can lead to improvements in research techniques, the validity of test results, and ultimately bird welfare. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of 2 different holding methods on broiler fear responses during the inversion test, a standardized method of assessing fear in poultry. On D15 and D34 mixed-sex broilers (N = 80) were inverted and held either by their shanks (N = 40) or feet (N = 40) at arm's length away from the experimenter for 30 s. The frequency of wing flapping, head movement, attempts to right, and vocalizations were observed from video recordings collected during the inversion test. Vocalizations at D15 and D34 were not different when comparing holding methods. Frequency of attempts to right and wing flapping at D15 were greater (P < 0.001) for birds held by their feet (0.90 and 16.6, respectively) than when they were held by their shanks (0.20 and 0.73, respectively). Similarly, on D34 wing flapping remained greater (P < 0.001) for birds held by their feet (23.8) compared to their shanks (8.1). Conversely, head movements were greater (P = 0.05) for birds held by their shanks (9.2) compared to their feet (6.3) on D15. Within both the shank and feet holding method, vocalizations at D15 were greater (30.7 and 35.6, respectively) compared to D34 (11.93 and 15.38, respectively) (P < 0.001). There was no holding method effect on head movements within each age. These results suggest that behaviors observed during the inversion test can be influenced by the inversion holding method and that handling should be standardized while conducting behavioral tests to assess fear in poultry.

摘要

客观、稳健且可重复的禽类恐惧反应评估可改进研究技术、提高试验结果的有效性,并最终改善禽类福利。本研究旨在探讨在倒置试验中,两种不同的持鸡方法对肉鸡恐惧反应的影响,该试验是评估禽类恐惧的标准化方法。在第 15 天和第 34 天,将混合性别肉鸡(N = 80)倒置,以手臂长度将鸡的跗关节(N = 40)或脚部(N = 40)握住并悬空 30 秒。在倒置试验过程中从视频记录中观察翅膀拍打、头部运动、试图站立和发声的频率。在比较持鸡方法时,第 15 天和第 34 天的发声没有差异。第 15 天,脚部持鸡的尝试站立和翅膀拍打频率更高(P < 0.001),分别为 0.90 和 16.6,而跗关节持鸡的分别为 0.20 和 0.73。同样,第 34 天,脚部持鸡的翅膀拍打频率仍更高(P < 0.001),为 23.8,而跗关节持鸡的为 8.1。相反,第 15 天,跗关节持鸡的头部运动更大(P = 0.05),为 9.2,而脚部持鸡的为 6.3。在跗关节和脚部持鸡方法中,第 15 天的发声均高于第 34 天(分别为 30.7 和 35.6,P < 0.001),而第 34 天的分别为 11.93 和 15.38。该研究结果表明,倒置试验中观察到的行为可能受到倒置持鸡方法的影响,在进行评估禽类恐惧的行为试验时,应标准化处理方法。

相似文献

1
A comparison of inversion test holding methods for broilers.肉鸡倒提试验握持方法的比较。
Poult Sci. 2024 Nov;103(11):104163. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104163. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior.人工直立体位操作中不同捕捉方式对肉鸡福利和行为的影响。
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4282-4289. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez284.
3
Color temperature of light-emitting diode lighting matters for optimum growth and welfare of broiler chickens.发光二极管照明的色温对肉鸡的最佳生长和福利很重要。
Animal. 2018 May;12(5):1015-1021. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002361. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Effect of holding temperature, shackling, sex, and age on broiler breast meat quality.持温、束缚、性别和年龄对肉鸡胸脯肉品质的影响。
Poult Sci. 2012 Feb;91(2):468-77. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00952.
5
Effects of environmental enrichment on activity and lameness in commercial broiler production.环境富集对商品肉鸡生产中活动和跛行的影响。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):197-205. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1456339. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Struggling behavior in shackled male and female broiler chickens.被束缚的雄性和雌性肉鸡的挣扎行为。
Poult Sci. 2000 May;79(5):652-5. doi: 10.1093/ps/79.5.652.
7
Play behaviour, fear responses and activity levels in commercial broiler chickens provided with preferred environmental enrichments.提供偏好环境丰容的商品代肉鸡的玩耍行为、恐惧反应和活动水平。
Animal. 2019 Jan;13(1):171-179. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001118. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Human factors affecting the behaviour and productivity of commercial broiler chickens.影响商品肉鸡行为和生产性能的人为因素。
Br Poult Sci. 2000 Jul;41(3):272-9. doi: 10.1080/713654939.
9
Effects of stocking density and string provision on welfare-related measures in commercial broiler chickens in windowed houses.笼养密度和栖木设置对有窗鸡舍商品肉鸡福利相关措施的影响。
Poult Sci. 2018 May 1;97(5):1503-1510. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey026.
10
Differences in performance, body conformation, and welfare of conventional and slow-growing broiler chickens raised at 2 stocking densities.在两种饲养密度下,常规生长速度和生长缓慢型肉鸡的生产性能、体形体况和福利的差异。
Poult Sci. 2020 Sep;99(9):4398-4407. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.对用于牛、猪、羊、家禽和马的恐惧测试的批判性综述。
Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 22;92(3):340-74. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016.
2
Behavioral responses of broiler chickens to handling: effects of dietary tryptophan and two lighting regimens.肉鸡对处理的行为反应:日粮色氨酸和两种光照方案的影响。
Poult Sci. 1993 Jul;72(7):1237-44. doi: 10.3382/ps.0721237.
3
Fear and fearfulness in animals.动物中的恐惧与胆怯。
Q Rev Biol. 1995 Jun;70(2):165-91. doi: 10.1086/418981.
4
Comparison of the stressfulness of harvesting broiler chickens by machine and by hand.机器与手工屠宰肉鸡的应激程度比较。
Br Poult Sci. 1986 Mar;27(1):109-14. doi: 10.1080/00071668608416861.
5
Animal welfare: concepts and measurement.动物福利:概念与衡量
J Anim Sci. 1991 Oct;69(10):4167-75. doi: 10.2527/1991.69104167x.