• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤知情关怀信念量表-儿童福利照顾者综合版,采用 Rasch 分析。

Trauma-informed care beliefs scale-comprehensive for child welfare carers using Rasch analysis.

机构信息

Charles Sturt University, School of Psychology, Bathurst, Australia.

Australian Catholic University, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Sep;155:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106966. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106966
PMID:39153342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature on trauma-informed care practices (TIC) indicates that this framework is beneficial for young people, carers, and staff. However, a significant gap in the literature and practice is the absence of psychometrically sound scales to measure carer adherence to TIC principles. Emerging evidence suggests that TIC practices shift carer attitudes and beliefs, which mediate positive outcomes for both carers and young people.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a theoretically comprehensive and psychometrically sound measure of carer TIC beliefs using Rasch methodology.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Active carers (N = 719, M = 43 years, SD = 10.7 years) from online support groups in Australia, Canada, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Ireland completed the questionnaire online.

METHODS

Based on previous research (e.g., limitations of the Trauma-Informed Belief Scale-Brief [TIBS-B]; Beehag, Dryer, et al., 2023a) and a scoping review of the TIC literature (Beehag, 2023), 61 candidate items were created that covered the three main characteristics of carer-related TIC theory (i.e., beliefs on TIC strategies to manage trauma symptoms, beliefs on the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACE), and beliefs on the importance of self-care/reflection). The resulting data was subjected to Rasch analyses.

RESULTS

Following analyses and minor modifications, a 35-item version of the questionnaire was confirmed, which fitted the Rasch model and demonstrated unidimensionality, reasonable targeting, and sound internal consistency reliability (Person Separation Index = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The TIBS-C is a psychometrically sound measure of child welfare carer TIC beliefs. Future studies are needed to provide further evidence of its validity (e.g., predictive validity), reliability (e.g., test-retest reliability) and clinical utility.

摘要

背景

创伤知情照护实践(TIC)的文献表明,该框架对年轻人、照顾者和工作人员都有益。然而,文献和实践中的一个重大差距是,缺乏衡量照顾者遵循 TIC 原则的心理测量学上合理的量表。新出现的证据表明,TIC 实践改变了照顾者的态度和信念,这对照顾者和年轻人都产生了积极的结果。

目的

使用 Rasch 方法制定一个理论上全面且心理测量学上合理的照顾者 TIC 信念测量工具。

参与者和设置

来自澳大利亚、加拿大、美国、英国和爱尔兰在线支持小组的活跃照顾者(N=719,M=43 岁,SD=10.7 岁)在线完成了问卷。

方法

基于先前的研究(例如,创伤知情信念量表-简短版的局限性[TIBS-B];Beehag、Dryer 等人,2023a)和 TIC 文献的范围综述(Beehag,2023),创建了 61 个候选条目,涵盖了照顾者相关 TIC 理论的三个主要特征(即,管理创伤症状的 TIC 策略的信念、对不良童年经历(ACE)的影响的信念以及自我照顾/反思的重要性的信念)。所得数据进行了 Rasch 分析。

结果

经过分析和小的修改,确认了问卷的 35 个项目版本,该版本符合 Rasch 模型,表现出一维性、合理的针对性和良好的内部一致性可靠性(个体分离指数=0.81)。

结论

TIBS-C 是一种心理测量学上合理的儿童福利照顾者 TIC 信念测量工具。需要进一步的研究来提供其有效性(例如,预测有效性)、可靠性(例如,重测信度)和临床实用性的进一步证据。

相似文献

1
Trauma-informed care beliefs scale-comprehensive for child welfare carers using Rasch analysis.创伤知情关怀信念量表-儿童福利照顾者综合版,采用 Rasch 分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Sep;155:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106966. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Validity and reliability of the 10-Item Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE-10) among adolescents in the child welfare system.儿童福利系统中青少年的 10 项不良童年经历问卷(ACE-10)的有效性和可靠性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;11:1258798. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258798. eCollection 2023.
3
Feasibility, validity and reliability of the ASCOT-Proxy and ASCOT-Carer among unpaid carers of people living with dementia in England.英国痴呆症患者非付费照顾者中 ASCOT-Proxy 和 ASCOT-Carer 的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02122-0.
4
Rasch analysis resulted in an improved Norwegian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS).拉施分析得出了改进后的挪威版疼痛态度和信念量表(PABS)。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
5
Screening for Pregnancy-Related Anxiety: Evaluation of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale-Screener Using Rasch Methodology.妊娠相关焦虑筛查:使用 Rasch 方法评估妊娠相关焦虑量表筛查器。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1407-1417. doi: 10.1177/10731911221103309. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Measuring childhood maltreatment: Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale.测量儿童期虐待:挪威版虐待和创伤暴露编年史(MACE)量表的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229661. eCollection 2020.
7
Test-retest reliability of the PDQ-Carer.PDQ-Carer 的重测信度。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;102:16-18. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
Psychometric Evaluation of the TIC Grade, a Self-Report Measure to Assess Youth Perceptions of the Quality of Trauma-Informed Care They Received.TIC 等级的心理计量学评估,一种自我报告的测量工具,用于评估年轻人对他们所接受的创伤知情照护质量的感知。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2022 Jul-Aug;28(4):319-325. doi: 10.1177/1078390320953896. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer).开发并验证了一种用于实验性癌症药物(PREM-ECM)及其护理人员的患者报告体验测量工具(PREM-ECM-Carer)。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11963-x.
10
Refinement and Validation of the Empowerment Audiology Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Evaluation.赋权听力学问卷的修订与验证:Rasch 分析与传统心理计量学评估。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(3):583-599. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001449. Epub 2023 Dec 12.