• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑医护人员的工作健康:监测工具的范围综述。

Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments.

机构信息

Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands

Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e079861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079861.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079861
PMID:39153793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331843/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Nurses' and doctors' health at work is crucial for their overall performance and the quality of care they provide. The Jobs Demands Resources (JD-R) model offers a framework for health at work, encompassing 'job demands', 'job resources', 'personal resources', 'leadership', 'well-being' and 'outcomes'. While various instruments exist to measure health, an overview of instruments specifically designed for assessing nurses and doctors health is currently missing. This study provides a comprehensive overview of available health instruments specifically developed and validated for healthcare professionals in hospital care.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies assessing the health of nurses and/or doctors in hospitals using or evaluating instruments based on the JD-R model, published between January 2011 and January 2024, excluding student-exclusive samples.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We extracted data on study and sample characteristics, as well as details of the measurement instruments, including main and subconstructs. Instruments were categorised based on the JD-R model domains. Descriptive analysis and data visualisation were performed using Excel and Python.

RESULTS

We included 1204 studies, reporting 986 unique instruments. We identified 32 comprehensive instruments suitable for broad health screening, measuring four or more of the JD-R model domains. Additionally, we identified instruments focusing on specific domains for targeted screening needs. Furthermore, we present frequently reported instruments assumed to be extensively evaluated, user-friendly, accessible and available in multiple languages.

CONCLUSIONS

Health at work cannot be determined by a single instrument alone, underscoring the multidimensional nature of workplace health. Alternatively, organisations should select instruments based on domains most relevant and applicable to their context. This approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment of health at work.

摘要

目的

护士和医生的工作健康对他们的整体表现和提供的护理质量至关重要。工作要求-资源(JD-R)模型为工作健康提供了一个框架,包括“工作要求”、“工作资源”、“个人资源”、“领导力”、“幸福感”和“结果”。虽然有各种工具可用于衡量健康,但目前缺乏专门用于评估护士和医生健康的工具概述。本研究提供了一个专门为医院护理中的医疗保健专业人员开发和验证的可用健康工具的综合概述。

设计

范围审查。

数据来源

MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL。

入选标准

使用或评估基于 JD-R 模型的工具评估护士和/或医生在医院中的健康状况的研究,发表时间为 2011 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月,不包括仅限学生的样本。

数据提取和综合

我们提取了关于研究和样本特征以及测量工具详细信息的数据,包括主要和子结构。根据 JD-R 模型领域对工具进行分类。使用 Excel 和 Python 进行描述性分析和数据可视化。

结果

我们纳入了 1204 项研究,报告了 986 个独特的工具。我们确定了 32 种适合广泛健康筛查的综合工具,可测量 JD-R 模型的四个或更多领域。此外,我们还确定了针对特定领域的工具,用于有针对性的筛查需求。此外,我们还介绍了经常报告的被认为经过广泛评估、易于使用、可及且多种语言可用的仪器。

结论

工作健康不能仅由单个仪器来确定,这突显了工作场所健康的多维性质。相反,组织应根据与自身背景最相关和最适用的领域选择工具。这种方法可确保更全面地评估工作健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/2bcd1678d97d/bmjopen-14-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/67ea3fca36a9/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/99221ac6ae68/bmjopen-14-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/2bcd1678d97d/bmjopen-14-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/67ea3fca36a9/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/99221ac6ae68/bmjopen-14-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c823/11331843/2bcd1678d97d/bmjopen-14-8-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments.优先考虑医护人员的工作健康:监测工具的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e079861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079861.
2
Assessing the Well-Being at Work of Nurses and Doctors in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Monitoring Instruments.评估医院护士和医生的工作幸福感:监测工具范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 25;12:e43692. doi: 10.2196/43692.
3
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Presenteeism exposures and outcomes amongst hospital doctors and nurses: a systematic review.医院医生和护士的出勤主义暴露情况及结果:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):985. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3789-z.
7
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
10
Personal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review.与护士韧性相关的个人和工作相关因素:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 May;93:129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare workers' sustainable employability in relation to quality of care: an umbrella review.医护人员的可持续就业能力与医疗质量的关系:一项综合综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e095126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095126.
2
Effectiveness of the mood shifter ball intervention on stress and burnout among nurses.情绪转换球干预对护士压力和职业倦怠的有效性。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 31;14:277. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_2163_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Uncovering gaps in workforce well-being: a national look at survey practice in Dutch university medical centres - an exploratory quantitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Well-Being at Work of Nurses and Doctors in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Monitoring Instruments.评估医院护士和医生的工作幸福感:监测工具范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 25;12:e43692. doi: 10.2196/43692.
2
'The WOW factors': comparing workforce organization and well-being for doctors, nurses, midwives and paramedics in England.“哇因素”:比较英格兰的医生、护士、助产士和护理人员的劳动力组织和幸福感。
Br Med Bull. 2022 Mar 21;141(1):60-79. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldac003.
3
Obstacles to Physicians' Emotional Health - Lessons from History.
揭示劳动力福祉方面的差距:对荷兰大学医学中心调查实践的全国性审视——一项探索性定量研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):e094939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094939.
医生情绪健康的障碍——历史教训
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 6;386(1):4-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2112095. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
4
In selecting measures for a comprehensive assessment of well-being, it is essential to include indicators of psychological need satisfaction.在选择用于全面评估幸福感的指标时,纳入心理需求满足情况的指标至关重要。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 1;23:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101474. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
The Interplay of Socioecological Determinants of Work-Life Balance, Subjective Wellbeing and Employee Wellbeing.工作-生活平衡的社会生态决定因素、主观幸福感和员工幸福感的相互作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094525.
6
Wellbeing, burnout, and safe practice among healthcare professionals: predictive influences of mindfulness, values, and self-compassion.医疗保健专业人员的幸福感、职业倦怠与安全实践:正念、价值观和自我同情的预测影响
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jun;27(5):1130-1143. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1898651. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.CONSORT 报告规范:用于评估患者报告结局测量工具测量属性的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197-2218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
9
Understanding sickness absence in nurses and personal support workers: Insights from frontline staff and key informants in Northeastern Ontario.理解护士和个人支持工作者的病假问题:安大略省东北部一线工作人员和主要知情人的观点。
Work. 2020;66(4):755-766. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203222.
10
Mental well-being, job satisfaction and self-rated workability in general practitioners and hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among listed patients: a cohort study combining survey data on GPs and register data on patients.精神健康、工作满意度和一般执业医师的自我评估工作能力与列出患者的门诊医疗敏感条件住院率之间的关系:一项结合了对一般执业医师的调查数据和对患者的登记数据的队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):997-1006. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009039. Epub 2019 Aug 19.