Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Public Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri, Chake Chake, Pemba Island, Tanzania.
Lancet. 2024 Aug 17;404(10453):683-691. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01403-X.
Human hookworm is a cause of enormous global morbidity. Current treatments have insufficient efficacy and their extensive and indiscriminate distribution could also result in drug resistance. Therefore, we tested the efficacy and safety of emodepside, a strong anthelmintic candidate that is currently undergoing clinical development for onchocerciasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections.
We conducted a double-blind, superiority, phase 2b, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing emodepside and albendazole. Participants in the emodepside group received six 5 mg tablets of emodepside (totalling 30 mg) and one placebo; participants in the albendazole group received one 400 mg tablet of albendazole and six placebos. Participants were recruited from four endemic villages and three secondary schools in Pemba Island, Tanzania. Participants aged 12-60 years were eligible for treatment if they were positive for hookworm infection, and they had 48 or more eggs per gram from four Kato-Katz thick smears and at least two slides had more than one hookworm egg present. Participants' treatment allocation was stratified by infection intensity and efficacy was measured by cure rate: participants who were hookworm positive and became hookworm negative after treatment. Adverse events were reported at 3 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 14-21 days post-treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05538767.
From Sept 15 to Nov 8, 2022, and from Feb 15 to March 15, 2023, 1609 individuals were screened for hookworm. Of these, 293 individuals were treated: 147 with albendazole and 146 with emodepside. Emodepside demonstrated superiority, with an observed cure rate against hookworm of 96·6%, which was significantly higher compared with albendazole (cure rate 81·2%, odds ratio 0·14, 95% CI 0·04-0·35; p=0·0001). The most common adverse event in the emodepside treatment group was vision blur at 3 h after treatment (57 [39%] of 146). Other common adverse events were vision blur at 24 h after treatment (55 [38%]), and headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (55 [38%] for headache and 43 [30%] for dizziness). In the emodepside treatment group, 298 (93%) of the 319 adverse events were mild. The most commonly reported adverse events in the albendazole treatment group were headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (27 [18%] of 147 for headache and 14 [10%] for dizziness). No serious adverse events were reported.
This phase 2b clinical trial confirms the high efficacy of emodepside against hookworm infections, solidifying emodepside as a promising anthelmintic candidate. However, although the observed safety events were generally mild in severity, considerations must be made to balance the strong efficacy outcomes with the increased frequency of adverse events compared with albendazole.
European Research Council.
人体钩虫是全球发病率极高的一个原因。目前的治疗方法疗效不足,而且广泛且不加区分地使用可能会导致耐药性。因此,我们测试了依美硝唑的疗效和安全性,依美硝唑是一种正在进行临床试验的强力驱虫候选药物,用于治疗盘尾丝虫病和土壤传播性蠕虫感染。
我们进行了一项双盲、优效性、2b 期、随机对照临床试验,比较了依美硝唑和阿苯达唑。依美硝唑组的参与者接受了六片 5 毫克的依美硝唑(共计 30 毫克)和一片安慰剂;阿苯达唑组的参与者接受了一片 400 毫克的阿苯达唑和六片安慰剂。参与者是从坦桑尼亚奔巴岛的四个流行村庄和三所中学招募的。年龄在 12-60 岁之间,钩虫感染阳性,且在四张加藤厚涂片上每克有 48 个或更多虫卵,至少有两张涂片有超过一个钩虫卵的参与者有资格接受治疗。参与者的治疗分配按感染强度分层,疗效通过治愈率来衡量:即治疗后由钩虫阳性变为钩虫阴性的参与者。不良反应在治疗后 3 小时、24 小时、48 小时和 14-21 天进行报告。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT05538767。
2022 年 9 月 15 日至 11 月 8 日和 2023 年 2 月 15 日至 3 月 15 日,有 1609 人接受了钩虫筛查。其中,293 人接受了治疗:147 人接受阿苯达唑治疗,146 人接受依美硝唑治疗。依美硝唑表现出优越性,对钩虫的治愈率为 96.6%,明显高于阿苯达唑(治愈率 81.2%,优势比 0.14,95%置信区间 0.04-0.35;p=0.0001)。依美硝唑治疗组最常见的不良反应是治疗后 3 小时出现视力模糊(146 人中有 57 人[39%])。其他常见的不良反应是治疗后 24 小时出现视力模糊(55[38%]),以及治疗后 3 小时出现头痛和头晕(55[38%]为头痛,43[30%]为头晕)。在依美硝唑治疗组中,319 例不良反应中有 298 例(93%)为轻度。阿苯达唑治疗组最常见的不良反应是治疗后 3 小时出现头痛和头晕(147 例中有 27 例[18%]为头痛,14 例[10%]为头晕)。没有报告严重的不良反应。
这项 2b 期临床试验证实了依美硝唑对钩虫感染的高度疗效,使依美硝唑成为一种很有前途的驱虫候选药物。然而,尽管观察到的安全性事件通常为轻度,但必须考虑到,与阿苯达唑相比,依美硝唑的疗效更强,但不良反应的频率更高。
欧洲研究理事会。