Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;23(3):331-340. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00589-8. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Control efforts against soil-transmitted helminths focus on preventive chemotherapy with albendazole and mebendazole, however these drugs yield unsatisfactory results against Trichuris trichiura infections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of moxidectin and albendazole compared with ivermectin and albendazole against T trichiura in adolescents living on Pemba Island, Tanzania.
This open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial was done in four secondary schools (Kilindi, Kwale, Ndagoni [Chake Chake District], and Kiuyu [Wete District]) on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Adolescents aged 12-19 years who tested positive for T trichiura in at least two of four Kato-Katz slides with a mean infection intensity of 48 eggs per gram (EPG) of stool or higher were considered for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned (21:21:2:2:8) to five treatment groups (8 mg moxidectin and 400 mg albendazole [group 1], 200 μg/kg ivermectin and 400 mg albendazole [group 2], 400 mg albendazole [group 3], 200 μg/kg ivermectin [group 4], or 8 mg moxidectin [group 5]) using a computer-generated randomisation code, stratified by baseline T trichiura infection intensity. Study site investigators and participants were not masked to study treatment; however, allocation was concealed to participants. The primary outcome was egg reduction rate (ERR) of T trichiura 14-21 days after treatment in the available case population. Moxidectin and albendazole was considered non-inferior to ivermectin and albendazole (control group) when the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the difference was higher than the non-inferiority margin of -2 percentage points. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04700423.
Between March 1 and April 30, 2021, 771 participants were assessed for eligibility. 221 (29%) of 771 participants were ineligible and a further 14 (2%) were excluded. 207 (39%) of 536 participants were randomly assigned to moxidectin and albendazole, 211 (39%) to ivermectin and albendazole, 19 (4%) to albendazole, 19 (4%) to ivermectin, and 80 (15%) to moxidectin. Primary outcome data were available for all 536 participants. The geometric mean ERR of T trichiura after 14-21 days was 96·8% (95% CI 95·8 to 97·6) with moxidectin and albendazole and 99·0% (98·7 to 99·3) with ivermectin and albendazole (difference of -2·2 percentage points [-4·2 to -1·4]). No serious adverse events were reported during the study. The most reported adverse events were headache (160 [34%] of 465), abdominal pain (78 [17%]), itching (44 [9%]), and dizziness (26 [6%]).
Our findings show inferiority of moxidectin and albendazole to ivermectin and albendazole against T trichiura. However, given the high efficacy, moxidectin coadministration might complement treatment progammes, particularly in areas in which ivermectin is not available FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, reference number OPP1153928.
针对土壤传播性蠕虫的控制工作侧重于使用阿苯达唑和甲苯达唑进行预防性化疗,但这些药物对鞭虫感染的疗效并不令人满意。我们旨在评估莫昔克丁和阿苯达唑与伊维菌素和阿苯达唑相比,在坦桑尼亚奔巴岛的青少年中对鞭虫的疗效和安全性。
这是一项在坦桑尼亚奔巴岛基林迪、夸莱、恩达戈尼(查克查克区)和基尤(威特区)的四所中学进行的开放性、非劣效性、随机、对照、2/3 期试验。在至少两份 Kato-Katz 载玻片上检测到鞭虫卵阳性,平均感染强度为每克粪便 48 个虫卵(EPG)或更高,且感染强度在 48 个虫卵/克粪便及以上的 12-19 岁青少年被认为符合纳入标准。参与者被随机分配(21:21:2:2:8)到五个治疗组(8mg 莫昔克丁和 400mg 阿苯达唑[组 1]、200μg/kg 伊维菌素和 400mg 阿苯达唑[组 2]、400mg 阿苯达唑[组 3]、200μg/kg 伊维菌素[组 4]或 8mg 莫昔克丁[组 5]),使用计算机生成的随机分组代码,按基线鞭虫感染强度分层。研究现场调查人员和参与者对研究治疗方案不知情;然而,参与者的分组是保密的。主要结局是治疗后 14-21 天鞭虫的虫卵减少率(ERR),可评估人群。莫昔克丁和阿苯达唑被认为不如伊维菌素和阿苯达唑(对照组),因为双侧 95%置信区间(CI)下限低于-2 个百分点的非劣效性边界。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT04700423。
在 2021 年 3 月 1 日至 4 月 30 日期间,对 771 名参与者进行了资格评估。221 名(29%)771 名参与者不符合纳入标准,另有 14 名(2%)被排除。536 名参与者中 207 名(39%)被随机分配到莫昔克丁和阿苯达唑组,211 名(39%)分到伊维菌素和阿苯达唑组,19 名(4%)分到阿苯达唑组,19 名(4%)分到伊维菌素组,80 名(15%)分到莫昔克丁组。所有 536 名参与者均有主要结局数据。治疗后 14-21 天鞭虫的几何平均 ERR 为 96.8%(95%CI 95.8-97.6),莫昔克丁和阿苯达唑组为 99.0%(98.7-99.3),伊维菌素和阿苯达唑组为 2.2%(-4.2 至-1.4)。研究期间未报告严重不良事件。最常见的不良事件是头痛(465 名中的 160 名[34%])、腹痛(78 名[17%])、瘙痒(44 名[9%])和头晕(26 名[6%])。
我们的研究结果表明,莫昔克丁和阿苯达唑对鞭虫的疗效不如伊维菌素和阿苯达唑。然而,鉴于其高疗效,莫昔克丁联合治疗可能补充治疗方案,特别是在伊维菌素不可用的地区。
比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会,参考号 OPP1153928。