Suppr超能文献

在科特迪瓦、老挝和坦桑尼亚奔巴岛感染鞭虫的学龄儿童和成年人体内联合使用伊维菌素和阿苯达唑的疗效和安全性:一项双盲、平行组、3 期、随机对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of co-administered ivermectin and albendazole in school-aged children and adults infected with Trichuris trichiura in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania: a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri, Chake Chake, Pemba, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):123-135. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00421-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventive chemotherapy with albendazole or mebendazole remains one of the cornerstones of soil-transmitted helminth control. However, these drugs are less effective against Trichuris trichiura. Combined ivermectin-albendazole is a promising treatment alternative, yet robust evidence is lacking. We aimed to demonstrate superiority of co-administered ivermectin-albendazole over albendazole monotherapy in three distinct epidemiological settings.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in community members aged 6-60 years infected with T trichiura in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania, between Sept 26, 2018, and June 29, 2020. Participants with at least 100 T trichiura eggs per g of stool at baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) using computer-generated randomisation sequences in varying blocks of four, six, and eight, stratified by baseline T trichiura infection intensity, to orally receive either a single dose of ivermectin (200 μg/kg) plus albendazole (400 mg) or albendazole (400 mg) plus placebo. Patients, field staff, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was cure rate against T trichiura, defined as the proportion of participants with no eggs in their faeces 14-21 days after treatment, assessed by Kato-Katz thick smears, and analysed in the available-case population according to intention-to-treat principles. Safety was a secondary outcome and was assessed 3 h and 24 h after drug administration. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03527732.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 13 and Dec 18, 2019, Jan 12 and April 5, 2019, and Sept 26 and Nov 5, 2018, 3737, 3694, and 1435 community members were screened for trial eligibility in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, respectively. In Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, 256, 274, and 305 participants, respectively, were randomly assigned to the albendazole group, and 255, 275, and 308, respectively, to the ivermectin-albendazole group. Primary outcome data were available for 722 participants treated with albendazole and 733 treated with ivermectin-albendazole. Ivermectin-albendazole showed significantly higher cure rates against T trichiura than albendazole in Laos (66% [140 of 213]vs 8% [16 of 194]; difference 58 percentage points, 95% CI 50 to 65, p<0·0001) and Pemba Island (49% [140 of 288]vs 6% [18 of 293], 43 percentage points, 36 to 49, p<0·0001) but had similar efficacy in Côte d'Ivoire (14% [32 of 232]vs 10% [24 of 235], 4 percentage points, -2 to 10, p=0·24). No serious adverse events were reported; observed events were mostly classified as mild (95% [266 of 279] in the albendazole group and 91% [288 of 317] in the ivermectin-albendazole group), and all were transient in nature.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with ivermectin-albendazole resulted in higher efficacy against trichuriasis than albendazole alone in Laos and Pemba Island but not in Côte d'Ivoire. We recommend implementation of this combination therapy for soil-transmitted helminth control in countries with high T trichiura prevalence and proven enhanced efficacy of this treatment, particularly where ivermectin is beneficial against other endemic helminthiases.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

摘要

背景

阿苯达唑或甲苯达唑预防性化疗仍然是控制土壤传播性蠕虫病的基石之一。然而,这些药物对鞭虫的疗效较低。伊维菌素-阿苯达唑联合治疗是一种很有前途的替代治疗方法,但缺乏有力的证据。我们旨在证明在三个不同的流行病学环境中,联合使用伊维菌素-阿苯达唑比阿苯达唑单药治疗更具优势。

方法

我们在科特迪瓦、老挝和坦桑尼亚奔巴岛的 6-60 岁感染鞭虫的社区成员中进行了一项双盲、平行组、3 期、随机对照试验。参与者在基线时至少有 100 个鞭虫卵/克粪便,使用计算机生成的随机数序列,以不同的 4、6 和 8 个块进行随机分组,按基线鞭虫感染强度分层,口服接受单次剂量的伊维菌素(200μg/kg)加阿苯达唑(400mg)或阿苯达唑(400mg)加安慰剂。患者、现场工作人员和结果评估人员对治疗分配进行了盲法。主要结局是鞭虫的治愈率,定义为治疗后 14-21 天粪便中无卵的比例,通过加藤厚涂片进行评估,并根据意向治疗原则分析可用病例人群。安全性是次要结局,在给药后 3 小时和 24 小时进行评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT03527732。

结果

2019 年 9 月 13 日至 12 月 18 日、2019 年 1 月 12 日至 4 月 5 日和 2018 年 9 月 26 日至 11 月 5 日,在科特迪瓦、老挝和奔巴岛分别筛选了 3737、3694 和 1435 名社区成员参加试验。在科特迪瓦、老挝和奔巴岛,分别有 256、274 和 305 名参与者被随机分配到阿苯达唑组,255、275 和 308 名参与者被随机分配到伊维菌素-阿苯达唑组。273 名参与者接受了阿苯达唑治疗,274 名参与者接受了伊维菌素-阿苯达唑治疗,主要结局数据可用。伊维菌素-阿苯达唑对鞭虫的治愈率明显高于阿苯达唑,在老挝(66%[140/213]与 8%[16/194];差异 58 个百分点,95%CI 50 至 65,p<0·0001)和奔巴岛(49%[140/288]与 6%[18/293];差异 43 个百分点,36 至 49,p<0·0001),但在科特迪瓦的疗效相似(14%[32/232]与 10%[24/235];差异 4 个百分点,-2 至 10,p=0·24)。没有严重的不良事件报告;观察到的事件大多被归类为轻度(阿苯达唑组 95%[266/279],伊维菌素-阿苯达唑组 91%[288/317]),所有事件均为一过性。

解释

伊维菌素-阿苯达唑治疗比阿苯达唑单药治疗对鞭虫病的疗效更高,在老挝和奔巴岛,但在科特迪瓦没有。我们建议在鞭虫病流行率高且证实这种治疗方法疗效增强的国家实施这种联合治疗方法,特别是在伊维菌素对其他地方性蠕虫病有益的情况下。

资金来源

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验