Suppr超能文献

比较在镇静程序下进行胃肠内镜检查期间预防低氧血症的氧疗方法:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparing oxygen therapies for hypoxemia prevention during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2024 Nov;98:111586. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111586. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Hypoxemia is the most frequent adverse event observed during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation. An optimum oxygen therapy has still not been conclusively determined.

DESIGN

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

SETTING

Digestive Endoscopy Center.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years old and of both sexes) during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation.

INTERVENTIONS

Pubmed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. were searched until June 30, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing any oxygen therapy with another oxygen therapy or with placebo (nasal cannula, NC) were included.

MEASUREMENT

The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO). Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed. Data are reported as odds ratios (OR), prediction intervals (PrI) and 95% CI. Bias risk was evaluated following the guidelines outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 RCTs with a total of 7552 patients. Compared to the use of NC, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) demonstrated superior efficacy in mitigating hypoxemia (NIPPV vs. NC, OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08-0.31, 95% PrI: 0.06-0.41), followed by Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) (WNJT vs. NC, OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.30, 95% PrI: 0.07-0.42). The efficacy for preventing hypoxemia was ranked as follows: NIPPV > WNJT > oropharynx/nasopharyngeal catheter > high-flow nasal oxygenation > nasal mask > NC.

CONCLUSIONS

During gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation, all other advanced oxygen therapies were found to be more efficacious than nasal cannula. NIPPV and WNJT appear to be the most efficacious oxygen therapy for preventing hypoxemia. Additionally, clinicians should make a choice regarding the most suitable oxygen therapy based on the risk population, type of endoscopy and adverse events.

摘要

研究目的

在程序镇静下进行胃肠内镜检查时,最常见的不良反应是低氧血症。目前仍未确定最佳的氧疗方法。

设计

系统评价和网络荟萃分析的随机临床试验。

设置

消化内镜中心。

患者

在程序镇静下进行胃肠内镜检查的成年人(≥18 岁,男女不限)。

干预措施

检索 PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase 和 Clinicaltrials.gov,检索时间截至 2023 年 6 月 30 日。纳入比较任何氧疗与另一种氧疗或安慰剂(鼻导管,NC)的随机临床试验(RCT)。

测量

主要结局是低氧血症的发生率,定义为脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)。采用随机效应网络荟萃分析。数据以比值比(OR)、预测区间(PrI)和 95%CI 表示。根据 Cochrane 协作组提出的指南评估偏倚风险。通过 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE)框架评估证据质量。

主要结果

我们纳入了 27 项 RCT,共 7552 名患者。与使用 NC 相比,无创正压通气(NIPPV)在减轻低氧血症方面更有效(NIPPV 与 NC 相比,OR=0.16,95%CI:0.08-0.31,95%PrI:0.06-0.41),其次是魏氏鼻咽管(WNJT)(WNJT 与 NC 相比,OR=0.17,95%CI:0.10-0.30,95%PrI:0.07-0.42)。预防低氧血症的疗效排名如下:NIPPV>WNJT>口咽/鼻咽导管>高流量鼻氧疗>鼻罩>NC。

结论

在程序镇静下进行胃肠内镜检查时,所有其他高级氧疗方法均比鼻导管更有效。NIPPV 和 WNJT 似乎是预防低氧血症最有效的氧疗方法。此外,临床医生应根据风险人群、内镜类型和不良反应选择最合适的氧疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验