Suppr超能文献

家庭脑电神经反馈治疗慢性疼痛:一项随机对照临床试验。

Home-based EEG Neurofeedback for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Waitemata Pain Services, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitematā, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Exsurgo Limited, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Pain. 2024 Nov;25(11):104651. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104651. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

This parallel, 2-arm, blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial examined whether, when added to usual care, active-electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG NFB) was safe and more effective than sham control-EEG NFB for chronic pain. In total, 116 participants with chronic pain were randomly assigned (1:1) to usual care plus ≥32 sessions of active-EEG NFB upregulating relative alpha power over C4 or usual care plus ≥32 sessions of sham control-EEG NFB. Per-protocol analyses revealed no significant between-group differences in the primary outcome, Brief Pain Inventory average pain (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -.04 [-.39 to .31], P = .90), or any secondary outcomes. However, 44% of participants in the active-EEG NFB group and 45% in the control-EEG NFB group reported at least a moderate (≥30%), clinically important improvement in Brief Pain Inventory average pain. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in both groups (P = .83), and none were serious. Post hoc analyses revealed similar upregulated relative alpha power in both groups during training, with concordant positive rewards delivered to the active-EEG group 100% of the time and the control-EEG group ∼25% of the time, suggesting a partially active sham intervention. When added to usual care, the active-EEG NFB intervention used in this study was not superior to the sham control-EEG NFB intervention. However, a large proportion of participants in both groups reported a clinically important reduction in pain intensity. A partially active sham intervention may have obscured between-group differences. The intervention was free of important side effects, with no safety concerns identified. PERSPECTIVE: This study is the first attempt at an appropriately blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial of alpha EEG NFB for the treatment of chronic pain. The findings may interest people living with chronic pain, clinicians involved in chronic pain management, and may inform the design of future EEG NFB trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621000667819.

摘要

这项平行、双臂、盲法、随机对照优势试验旨在探究,在常规治疗的基础上,主动脑电神经反馈(EEG NFB)是否比假控制 EEG NFB 更安全,更有效治疗慢性疼痛。共有 116 名慢性疼痛患者被随机(1:1)分配至常规治疗+≥32 次增强 C4 区相对阿尔法波功率的主动 EEG NFB 或常规治疗+≥32 次假控制 EEG NFB。意向治疗分析显示,主要结局(简明疼痛量表平均疼痛,平均差值[95%置信区间]:-.04[-.39 至.31],P=0.90)或任何次要结局均无显著组间差异。然而,主动 EEG NFB 组和假控制 EEG NFB 组分别有 44%和 45%的患者报告简明疼痛量表平均疼痛至少有中度(≥30%)、有临床意义的改善。两组的治疗中出现的不良事件数量相似(P=0.83),且均无严重不良事件。事后分析显示,两组在训练期间均有相似的相对阿尔法波功率上调,主动 EEG 组 100%的时间和假控制 EEG 组约 25%的时间获得一致的正向反馈,提示部分为主动的假干预。当添加到常规治疗中时,本研究中使用的主动 EEG NFB 干预并不优于假控制 EEG NFB 干预。然而,两组中有很大比例的患者报告疼痛强度有明显减轻。部分主动假干预可能掩盖了组间差异。该干预措施无重要副作用,未发现安全问题。观点:这是第一项针对慢性疼痛的 alpha EEG NFB 治疗的适当盲法、随机、假对照试验。研究结果可能会引起慢性疼痛患者、参与慢性疼痛管理的临床医生的兴趣,并可能为未来 EEG NFB 试验的设计提供信息。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR):ACTRN12621000667819。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验