Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Dyslexia. 2024 Nov;30(4):e1783. doi: 10.1002/dys.1783.
Many studies have attempted to identify the root cause of dyslexia. Different theories of dyslexia have proposed either a phonological, attentional, or visual deficit. While research has used eye-tracking to study dyslexia, only two previous studies have used the moving-window paradigm to explore the perceptual span in dyslexic reading, and none have done so in visual search. The present study analysed the perceptual span using both reading and visual search tasks to identify language-independent attentional impairments in dyslexics. We found equivocal evidence that the perceptual span was impaired in dyslexic reading and no evidence of impairment in visual search. However, dyslexic participants did show deficits in the visual search task, with lower search accuracy and shorter saccades compared with controls. These results lend support for a visual, rather than attentional or phonological, account of dyslexia.
许多研究都试图找出阅读障碍的根本原因。不同的阅读障碍理论提出了语音、注意力或视觉缺陷。虽然研究已经使用眼动追踪来研究阅读障碍,但只有两项先前的研究使用移动窗口范式来探索阅读障碍者的感知广度,而且没有一项研究在视觉搜索中这样做。本研究使用阅读和视觉搜索任务来分析感知广度,以确定阅读障碍者是否存在与语言无关的注意力损伤。我们发现,阅读障碍者在阅读中感知广度受损的证据并不明确,而在视觉搜索中则没有受损的证据。然而,阅读障碍者在视觉搜索任务中确实表现出缺陷,与对照组相比,搜索准确性较低,眼跳较短。这些结果支持阅读障碍的视觉而非注意力或语音解释。