• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术细胞块和液基细胞学检查对胰腺肿瘤的诊断效能。

Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Health Sciences İzmir Bozyaka Training and Education Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.

Department of Gastroenterology, Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Education Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 3;35(8):665-674. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23609.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2024.23609
PMID:39155569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363155/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of cell block (CB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic tumors. The study included patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic tumors between January 2015 and February 2021 and whose cytology samples were both processed for LBC and CB. Data of 390 patients (220 men, mean age: 64.2 ± 11.4 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Of the detected lesions (size: 17-120 mm; mean: 39.9 ± 13.9 mm), 220 (56.4%) were located in the head and uncinate process of the pancreas. Lesions in 339 (86.9%) patients were diagnosed as malignant using CB and/or LBC and suspicious for malignancy in 44 (11.3%) patients. In 7 patients with non-diagnostic (6 cases) or negative for malignancy (1 case) EUS-FNA results using both methods, the diagnosis of malignancy was established via ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy. Malignancy was detected in 324 (92.4%), 313 (87.9%), and 298 (87.9%) patients using CB, LBC, and both CB and LBC, respectively. Final diagnosis was obtained in 339 (98%) patients by using CB and/or LBC. The combined use of the both methods exhibited significantly superior diagnostic accuracy compared with CB and LBC alone (P < .001). Liquid-based cytology and CB exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic tumors in patients undergoing EUS-FNA. The combined use of both methods showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than LBC and CB alone.

摘要

本研究旨在评估细胞块(CB)和液基细胞学(LBC)在超声内镜引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)诊断胰腺肿瘤中的诊断效能。研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 2 月期间因胰腺肿瘤接受 EUS-FNA 检查且细胞学样本同时进行 LBC 和 CB 处理的患者。回顾性分析了 390 例患者(220 例男性,平均年龄:64.2±11.4 岁)的数据。检测到的病变(大小:17-120mm;平均:39.9±13.9mm)中,220 例(56.4%)位于胰头和钩突。339 例(86.9%)患者的 CB 和/或 LBC 诊断为恶性,44 例(11.3%)患者可疑恶性。在 7 例两种方法均未诊断(6 例)或未诊断为恶性(1 例)的 EUS-FNA 结果中,通过超声引导经皮活检确定为恶性。使用 CB、LBC 和 CB 和 LBC 联合检测,分别在 324 例(92.4%)、313 例(87.9%)和 298 例(87.9%)患者中检测到恶性肿瘤。339 例(98%)患者通过使用 CB 和/或 LBC 获得最终诊断。与单独使用 CB 和 LBC 相比,两种方法联合使用的诊断准确性显著更高(P<0.001)。液基细胞学和 CB 对 EUS-FNA 检查的胰腺肿瘤患者具有较高的诊断准确性。两种方法联合使用的诊断准确性显著高于单独使用 LBC 和 CB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/7299cdf34d6a/tjg-35-8-665_f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/7ef08a2e47fa/tjg-35-8-665_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/3ef8ac736114/tjg-35-8-665_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/00d00e855458/tjg-35-8-665_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/7299cdf34d6a/tjg-35-8-665_f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/7ef08a2e47fa/tjg-35-8-665_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/3ef8ac736114/tjg-35-8-665_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/00d00e855458/tjg-35-8-665_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/11363155/7299cdf34d6a/tjg-35-8-665_f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术细胞块和液基细胞学检查对胰腺肿瘤的诊断效能。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 3;35(8):665-674. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23609.
2
Diagnostic efficacy of cell block immunohistochemistry, smear cytology, and liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: a single-institution experience.细胞块免疫组织化学、涂片细胞学及液基细胞学检查在超声内镜引导下胰腺病变细针穿刺中的诊断效能:单机构经验
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108762. eCollection 2014.
3
Diagnostic efficacy of liquid-based cytology for solid pancreatic lesion samples obtained with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Propensity score-matched analysis.基于液基细胞学的内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术获取的胰腺实性病变样本的诊断效能:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jul;29(5):608-616. doi: 10.1111/den.12827. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Diagnostic Efficacy of Liquid-Based Cytology in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Mass Lesions During the Learning Curve: A Retrospective Study.液体基细胞学在经内镜超声引导下细针抽吸胰腺肿块病变学习曲线期间的诊断效能:一项回顾性研究。
Pancreas. 2019 May/Jun;48(5):686-689. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001304.
5
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查(EUS-FNA)与内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断价值比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2151-2158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2151.
6
Comparison of smear cytology and liquid-based cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic lesions: experience from a large tertiary center.超声内镜引导下细针抽吸活检中涂片细胞学与液基细胞学的比较:来自一个大型三级中心的经验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):932-942. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.10.033. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
7
K-ras mutation analysis of residual liquid-based cytology specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves cell block diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.经内镜超声引导细针抽吸后剩余液基细胞学标本的 K-ras 突变分析提高了胰腺导管腺癌的细胞块诊断。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193692. eCollection 2018.
8
Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检时进行触摸印片细胞学检查,在评估胰腺实性病变方面,其样本质量和诊断率与标准内镜超声引导下细针抽吸标本相当。
Cytopathology. 2019 Mar;30(2):179-186. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12662. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.实性胰腺病变的诊断评估:内镜超声引导下细针抽吸活检与经皮超声引导下核心针活检。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Nov;46(11):1596-1602. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03494-y. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
10
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) in insulinomas: Indications and clinical relevance in a single investigator cohort of 47 patients.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)在胰岛素瘤中的应用:47例单中心研究队列的适应证及临床意义
Endocrine. 2017 Apr;56(1):158-163. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1179-z. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查(EUS-FNA)与内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断价值比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2151-2158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2151.
2
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.内镜超声引导下组织采集(EUS-FNA)与 EUS-FNB 对无 ROSE 的胰腺实性肿块的诊断性能:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 24;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02682-3.
3
Utility of cell block as an adjunct to liquid-based cytology for diagnosing papillary thyroid carcinoma.细胞块在液基细胞学检查中诊断甲状腺乳头状癌的辅助作用。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2020 Oct-Dec;63(4):581-586. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_999_19.
4
Use of Liquid-based Cytology and Cell Block Combined Technique for an Accurate Diagnosis of Oral Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report.运用液基细胞学和细胞块联合技术准确诊断口腔弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:一例报告
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):823. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100823.
5
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.对比内镜超声引导下细针活检与细针抽吸在胰腺癌基因谱分析和 DNA 产量方面的效果:一项随机交叉试验。
Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):376-382. doi: 10.1055/a-1223-2171. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Fork-tip needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.内镜超声引导下实性胰腺肿块采样中叉尖针活检与细针穿刺抽吸的比较:一项随机交叉研究
Endoscopy. 2020 Jun;52(6):454-461. doi: 10.1055/a-1114-5903. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional smear cytology for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective randomized noninferiority study.超声内镜引导下穿刺活检术对胰腺实体肿块的液基细胞学与传统涂片细胞学检查的比较:一项前瞻性随机非劣效性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):837-846.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Diagnostic Efficacy of Liquid-Based Cytology in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Mass Lesions During the Learning Curve: A Retrospective Study.液体基细胞学在经内镜超声引导下细针抽吸胰腺肿块病变学习曲线期间的诊断效能:一项回顾性研究。
Pancreas. 2019 May/Jun;48(5):686-689. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001304.
9
Comparison of Conventional Cytology, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Cell Block in the Evaluation of Peritoneal Fluid in Gynecology Malignancies.传统细胞学、液基细胞学及细胞块在妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔液评估中的比较
Acta Cytol. 2019;63(1):63-72. doi: 10.1159/000495571. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
10
Effect of Pancreatic Mass Size on Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.胰腺肿块大小对超声内镜引导下细针抽吸术临床结局的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jul;64(7):2006-2013. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5435-3. Epub 2019 Jan 2.