Suppr超能文献

裁判员如何进行视觉探索?对足球裁判员参照性头部和眼动的现场考察。

How do referees visually explore? An in-situ examination of the referential head and eye movements of football referees.

机构信息

Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Royal Dutch Football Association (KNVB), Zeist, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2024 Jul;42(13):1243-1258. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2387972. Epub 2024 Aug 18.

Abstract

The majority of a football referee's time is spent assessing open-play situations, yet little is known about how referees search for information during this uninterrupted play. The aim of the current study was to examine the exploratory gaze behaviour of elite and sub-elite football referees in open-play game situations. Four elite (i.e. national) and eight sub-elite (i.e. regional) referees officiated an in-situ football match while wearing a mobile eye-tracker to assess their gaze behaviour. Both referential head and eye movements (i.e. moving gaze away from and then back to the ball) were measured. Results showed gaze behaviour was characterised overall by more referential head than eye movements (75 vs 25%), which were of longer duration (950 vs 460 ms). Moreover, elite referees employed faster referential movements (~640 vs 730 ms), spending less time with their gaze away from the ball (carrier) than the sub-elite referees. Crucially, both the referential head and eye movements were coordinated relative to key events in the match, in this case passes, showing that referees anticipate the passes to ensure that the referential movements did not occur during passes, rather before or after. The results further our understanding of the coordinative gaze behaviours that underpin expertise in officiating.

摘要

大多数足球裁判的大部分时间都用于评估比赛中的常规情况,但对于裁判在这种不间断的比赛中如何搜索信息,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是观察精英和次级精英足球裁判在常规比赛情况下的探索性注视行为。四名精英(即国家级)和八名次级精英(即地区级)裁判在现场执法一场足球比赛的同时,佩戴了一个移动眼动追踪器来评估他们的注视行为。参考性的头部和眼部运动(即从球上移开视线然后再回到球上)都被测量到了。结果表明,整体上,裁判的注视行为更多地表现为参考性头部运动,而不是眼部运动(75%比 25%),且头部运动的持续时间更长(950 毫秒比 460 毫秒)。此外,精英裁判的参考性运动速度更快(~640 毫秒比 730 毫秒),将视线从球(携带者)上移开的时间比次级精英裁判少。至关重要的是,无论是参考性的头部运动还是眼部运动,都与比赛中的关键事件(在这种情况下是传球)相协调,这表明裁判会预测传球,以确保参考性运动不会在传球过程中发生,而是在传球之前或之后发生。研究结果进一步了解了支持裁判专业技能的协调注视行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验