Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:20. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.20. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
This study aimed to explore how the grading system affected medical students’ academic performance based on their perceptions of the learning environment and intrinsic motivation in the context of changing from norm-referenced A–F grading to criterion-referenced honors/pass/fail grading.
The study involved 238 second-year medical students from 2014 (n=127, A–F grading) and 2015 (n=111, honors/pass/fail grading) at Yonsei University College of Medicine in Korea. Scores on the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure, the Academic Motivation Scale, and the Basic Medical Science Examination were used to measure overall learning environment perceptions, intrinsic motivation, and academic performance, respectively. Serial mediation analysis was conducted to examine the pathways between the grading system and academic performance, focusing on the mediating roles of student perceptions and intrinsic motivation.
The honors/pass/fail grading class students reported more positive perceptions of the learning environment, higher intrinsic motivation, and better academic performance than the A–F grading class students. Mediation analysis demonstrated a serial mediation effect between the grading system and academic performance through learning environment perceptions and intrinsic motivation. Student perceptions and intrinsic motivation did not independently mediate the relationship between the grading system and performance.
Reducing the number of grades and eliminating rank-based grading might have created an affirming learning environment that fulfills basic psychological needs and reinforces the intrinsic motivation linked to academic performance. The cumulative effect of these 2 mediators suggests that a comprehensive approach should be used to understand student performance.
本研究旨在探讨在从基于常模参照的 A-F 评分转变为基于标准参照的优秀/及格/不及格评分的背景下,分级系统如何通过学生对学习环境和内在动机的感知来影响医学生的学业成绩。
本研究涉及韩国延世大学医学院 2014 年(n=127,A-F 评分)和 2015 年(n=111,优秀/及格/不及格评分)的 238 名二年级医学生。使用邓迪准备教育环境量表、学术动机量表和基础医学科学考试成绩来衡量整体学习环境感知、内在动机和学业成绩。连续中介分析用于检验分级系统与学业成绩之间的关系,重点关注学生感知和内在动机的中介作用。
优秀/及格/不及格评分班级的学生比 A-F 评分班级的学生对学习环境的感知更积极,内在动机更高,学业成绩更好。中介分析表明,分级系统与学业成绩之间存在通过学习环境感知和内在动机的连续中介效应。学生感知和内在动机并没有独立中介分级系统与成绩之间的关系。
减少评分等级数量和消除基于等级的评分可能创造了一个肯定的学习环境,满足了基本的心理需求,并增强了与学业成绩相关的内在动机。这两个中介因素的累积效应表明,应该采用综合方法来理解学生的表现。