Suppr超能文献

医学院分层分级的问题性持续存在。

The Problematic Persistence of Tiered Grading in Medical School.

作者信息

Smith James F, Piemonte Nicole M

机构信息

Departments of Medical Education and Medical Humanities, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Departments of Medical Humanities and Student Affairs, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2023 Aug-Sep;35(4):467-476. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2074423. Epub 2022 May 26.

Abstract

: The evaluation of medical students is a critical, complex, and controversial process. It is tightly woven into the medical school curriculum, beginning at the inception of the medical student's professional journey. In this respect, medical student evaluation is among the first in a series of ongoing, lifelong assessments that influence the interpersonal, ethical, and socioeconomic dimensions necessary for an effective physician workforce. Yet, tiered grading has a questionable historic pedagogic basis in American medical education, and evidence suggests that tiered grading itself is a source of student burnout, anxiety, depression, increased competitiveness, reduced group cohesion, and racial biases. : In its most basic form, medical student evaluation is an assessment of the initial cognitive and technical competencies ultimately needed for the safe and effective practice of contemporary medicine. At many American medical schools, such evaluation relies largely on norm-based comparisons, such as tiered grading. Yet, tiered grading can cause student distress, is considered unfair by most students, is associated with biases against under-represented minorities, and demonstrates inconsistent correlation with residency performance. While arguments that tiered grading motivates student performance have enjoyed historic precedence in academia, such arguments are not supported by robust data or theories of motivation. : Given the evolving recognition of the deleterious effects on medical student mental health, cohesiveness, and diversity, the use of tiered grading in medical schools to measure or stimulate academic performance, or by residency program directors to distinguish residency applicants, remains questionable. Examination of tiered grading in its historical, psychometric, psychosocial, and moral dimensions and the various arguments used to maintain it reveals a need for investigation of, if not transition to, alternative and non-tiered assessments of our medical students.

摘要

医学生评估是一个关键、复杂且具有争议性的过程。它紧密融入医学院课程,从医学生职业旅程开始就存在。在这方面,医学生评估是一系列持续的终身评估中的首批评估之一,这些评估会影响有效医生队伍所需的人际、伦理和社会经济层面。然而,分级评分在美国医学教育中有着值得质疑的历史教学基础,而且有证据表明分级评分本身就是学生倦怠、焦虑、抑郁、竞争加剧、团队凝聚力下降和种族偏见的一个根源。

在最基本的形式中,医学生评估是对当代医学安全有效实践最终所需的初始认知和技术能力的评估。在许多美国医学院,这种评估很大程度上依赖基于常模的比较,比如分级评分。然而,分级评分会导致学生苦恼,大多数学生认为这不公平,与对少数族裔代表性不足群体的偏见有关,并且与住院医师培训表现的相关性不一致。虽然分级评分能激励学生表现的观点在学术界有历史先例,但此类观点并未得到有力数据或动机理论的支持。

鉴于对分级评分对医学生心理健康、凝聚力和多样性的有害影响的认识不断演变,医学院使用分级评分来衡量或激励学业表现,或者住院医师培训项目主任用其来区分住院医师申请人,这仍然值得怀疑。从历史、心理测量、心理社会和道德层面审视分级评分以及用于维持它的各种论点,表明有必要对医学生进行替代的、非分级的评估进行调查,即便不是转向这种评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验