• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者不良结局风险预测模型的建立与验证。

Development and validation of risk prediction model for adverse outcomes in trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Innovative Medical Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2391018. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2391018. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2391018
PMID:39155796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334749/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of trauma patients is highly dependent on early medical diagnosis. By constructing a nomogram model, the risk of adverse outcomes can be displayed intuitively and individually, which has important clinical implications for medical diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate models for predicting patients with adverse outcomes of trauma that can be used in different data availability settings in China.

METHODS

This was a retrospective prognostic study using data from 8 public tertiary hospitals in China from 2018. The data were randomly divided into a development set and a validation set. Simple, improved and extended models predicting adverse outcomes were developed, with adverse outcomes defined as in-hospital death or ICU transfer, and patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values as predictors. The results of the models were presented in the form of nomograms, and performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall (PR) curves (PR-AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Our final dataset consisted of 18,629 patients (40.2% female, mean age of 52.3), 1,089 (5.85%) of whom resulted in adverse outcomes. In the external validation set, three models achieved ROC-AUC of 0.872, 0.881, and 0.903, and a PR-AUC of 0.339, 0.337, and 0.403, respectively. In terms of the calibration curves and DCA, the models also performed well.

CONCLUSIONS

This prognostic study found that three prediction models and nomograms including the patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values can support clinicians in more accurately identifying patients who are at risk of adverse outcomes in different settings based on data availability.

摘要

背景

创伤患者的预后高度依赖于早期的医学诊断。通过构建列线图模型,可以直观地个体化显示不良结局的风险,这对医学诊断具有重要的临床意义。

目的

构建并验证可用于中国不同数据可用性情境下预测创伤不良结局的患者的模型。

方法

这是一项回顾性预后研究,使用了来自中国 8 家公立三级医院的 2018 年数据。数据随机分为开发集和验证集。开发集和验证集中分别构建了简单、改进和扩展的预测创伤不良结局的模型,将住院死亡或转入 ICU 定义为不良结局,将患者的临床特征、生命体征、诊断和实验室检查值作为预测因素。模型的结果以列线图的形式呈现,通过接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)、精确性-召回率(PR)曲线(PR-AUC)、Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。

结果

最终数据集包括 18629 例患者(40.2%为女性,平均年龄为 52.3 岁),其中 1089 例(5.85%)患者发生了不良结局。在外部验证集中,3 个模型的 ROC-AUC 分别为 0.872、0.881 和 0.903,PR-AUC 分别为 0.339、0.337 和 0.403。在校准曲线和 DCA 方面,模型也表现良好。

结论

本研究发现,纳入患者临床特征、生命体征、诊断和实验室检查值的 3 个预测模型和列线图,可根据数据可用性,帮助不同情境下的临床医生更准确地识别发生不良结局风险较高的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/29cda90b38c1/IANN_A_2391018_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/6e2875efc266/IANN_A_2391018_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/746d22d158e8/IANN_A_2391018_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/1a5c5d88bbf6/IANN_A_2391018_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/0be6832f2ebc/IANN_A_2391018_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/29cda90b38c1/IANN_A_2391018_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/6e2875efc266/IANN_A_2391018_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/746d22d158e8/IANN_A_2391018_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/1a5c5d88bbf6/IANN_A_2391018_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/0be6832f2ebc/IANN_A_2391018_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2754/11334749/29cda90b38c1/IANN_A_2391018_F0005_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of risk prediction model for adverse outcomes in trauma patients.创伤患者不良结局风险预测模型的建立与验证。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2391018. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2391018. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
A dynamic online nomogram predicting post-traumatic arrhythmias: A retrospective cohort study.一种预测创伤后心律失常的动态在线列线图:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;84:111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.055. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
3
A novel nomogram based on the patient's clinical data and CT signs to predict poor outcomes in AIS patients.一种基于患者临床数据和CT征象的新型列线图,用于预测急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的不良预后。
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 6;13:e18662. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18662. eCollection 2025.
4
Construction and evaluation of a mortality prediction model for patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy based on machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的行连续性肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者死亡率预测模型的构建与评估。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2388709. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2388709. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
[Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for 28-day mortality of septic shock patients based on routine laboratory data mining].基于常规实验室数据挖掘的脓毒性休克患者28天死亡率列线图预测模型的建立
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Nov;36(11):1127-1132. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240202-00108.
6
[Establishment and Validation of a Predictive Model for Gallstone Disease in the General Population: A Multicenter Study].[普通人群胆结石疾病预测模型的建立与验证:一项多中心研究]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 May 20;55(3):641-652. doi: 10.12182/20240560501.
7
Predictive nomogram for early detection of invasive fungal disease deterioration --- a 10-year retrospective cohort study.侵袭性真菌病病情恶化早期检测的预测列线图——一项10年回顾性队列研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 7;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11030-1.
8
[Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting in-hospital postoperative heart failure in elderly patients with hip fracture].[预测老年髋部骨折患者术后院内发生心力衰竭的列线图的构建与验证]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 18;56(5):874-883. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.05.019.
9
Early death incidence and prediction in stage IV large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.IV 期肺大细胞神经内分泌癌的早期死亡率和预测。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39294. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039294.
10
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of in-hospital MACE for emergence NSTE-ACS: A retrospective multicenter study based on the Chinese population.预测急诊非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内主要不良心血管事件风险的列线图的开发与验证:一项基于中国人群的回顾性多中心研究
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jul;199:105884. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105884. Epub 2025 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
A recalibrated prediction model can identify level-1 trauma patients at risk of nosocomial pneumonia.经重新校准的预测模型可识别出存在医院获得性肺炎风险的 1 级创伤患者。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4933-4941. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04766-5. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Adverse Outcomes of Geriatric Trauma Patients Based on Frailty Syndrome.基于衰弱综合征的老年创伤患者不良结局列线图的开发与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jun 7;15:5499-5512. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S365635. eCollection 2022.
3
Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores.
MGAP 评分对住院创伤患者的意义:与 TRISS、ISS 和 NISS 评分的比较。
Injury. 2022 Sep;53(9):3059-3064. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
A retrospective study on evaluating GAP, MGAP, RTS and ISS trauma scoring system for the prediction of mortality among multiple trauma patients.一项关于评估GAP、MGAP、RTS和ISS创伤评分系统对多发伤患者死亡率预测价值的回顾性研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 28;76:103536. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103536. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Predicting outcomes after trauma: Prognostic model development based on admission features through machine learning.创伤后结局预测:基于机器学习的入院特征预后模型建立。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 10;100(49):e27753. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027753.
6
Machine learning for outcome predictions of patients with trauma during emergency department care.机器学习在急诊科患者创伤预后预测中的应用。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100407.
7
Nomogram to predict the outcomes of patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.列线图预测接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的微卫星不稳定高转移性结直肠癌患者的结局。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003370.
8
A novel risk score for in-hospital perioperative mortality of five major surgeries.一种用于五种主要手术围手术期院内死亡的新风险评分。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 May 19;33(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab080.
9
Medication-related harm in older adults following hospital discharge: development and validation of a prediction tool.老年人出院后与药物相关的伤害:预测工具的开发和验证。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Feb;29(2):142-153. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009587. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
10
Machine Learning Models of Survival Prediction in Trauma Patients.创伤患者生存预测的机器学习模型
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 5;8(6):799. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060799.