Kaneda Kotaro, Inoue Tomoaki, Koga Yasutaka, Yagi Takeshi, Todani Masaki, Nakahara Takashi, Fujita Motoki, Tsuruta Ryosuke
Advanced Medical Emergency and Critical Care Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 18;16(7):e64877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64877. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Evidence on the efficacy of mamushi antivenom serum is limited.
To investigate the effectiveness of mamushi () antivenom serum.
The Observational Research Of the Clinical course after mamusHI bite (OROCHI) study was a prospective multicenter study conducted at 24 hospitals in Japan. Patients hospitalized due to mamushi bite were registered. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were adverse effects, pain (numerical rating scale), and grade of swelling. We performed a cohort analysis to compare outcomes between patients treated with mamushi antivenom serum (antivenom group) and those who were not treated with the serum (no-antivenom group).
Overall, 106 patients were registered across 18 hospitals between April 22, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Of these, 92 were eligible for the analyses, with 53 and 39 in the antivenom and no-antivenom groups. The median (interquartile) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the antivenom and no-antivenom groups (5 (3-6) days vs. 3 (1-8) days, = 0.369). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for a hospital stay of >4 days was 1.331 in patients treated with mamushi antivenom serum (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.744‒2.015, = 0.574) and 6.154 in patients treated with cepharanthine (95% CI = 1.442-26.258, = 0.014). Pain and the grade of swelling were worse in the antivenom group than in the no-antivenom group up to 24 h after arrival, but there were no differences in these outcomes after 48 h.
Although the effectiveness of mamushi antivenom serum in reducing the length of hospitalization was not demonstrated, beneficial effects on pain and swelling were observed.
关于蝮蛇抗毒血清疗效的证据有限。
研究蝮蛇抗毒血清的有效性。
蝮蛇咬伤后临床病程的观察性研究(OROCHI)是一项在日本24家医院进行的前瞻性多中心研究。登记因蝮蛇咬伤住院的患者。主要终点是住院时间。次要终点是不良反应、疼痛(数字评分量表)和肿胀程度。我们进行了队列分析,以比较接受蝮蛇抗毒血清治疗的患者(抗毒血清组)和未接受血清治疗的患者(非抗毒血清组)的结局。
总体而言,在2020年4月22日至2022年10月31日期间,18家医院共登记了106例患者。其中,92例符合分析条件,抗毒血清组和非抗毒血清组分别有53例和39例。抗毒血清组和非抗毒血清组的中位(四分位间距)住院时间无显著差异(5(3 - 6)天 vs. 3(1 - 8)天,P = 0.369)。在多变量分析中,接受蝮蛇抗毒血清治疗的患者住院时间>4天的调整优势比为1.331(95%置信区间(CI)= 0.744 - 2.015,P = 0.574),接受千金藤素治疗的患者为6.154(95% CI = 1.442 - 26.258,P = 0.014)。到达后24小时内,抗毒血清组的疼痛和肿胀程度比非抗毒血清组更严重,但48小时后这些结局无差异。
虽然未证明蝮蛇抗毒血清在缩短住院时间方面的有效性,但观察到其对疼痛和肿胀有有益作用。