Cheng Beatrice Wing-Tung, Ko Tsz Yan, Lai Yee Tak Alta
Department of Radiology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, HKG.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 18;16(7):e64791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64791. eCollection 2024 Jul.
This study aims to assess the correlation between imaging features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
This is a retrospective single-institution study of patients who underwent CEM from December 2019 to August 2023. Each patient had at least one histologically proven invasive breast cancer with a core biopsy performed. Patients with a history of breast cancer treatment and lesions not entirely included in the CEM images were excluded. The images were interpreted using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) lexicon for CEM, published in 2022. Different imaging features, including the presence of calcifications, architectural distortion, non-mass enhancement, mass morphology, internal enhancement pattern, the extent of enhancement, and lesion conspicuity, were analyzed. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous variables, including luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal-like. The association between the imaging features and molecular subtypes was analyzed with a Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was assumed when the p-value was <0.05.
A total of 31 patients with 36 malignant lesions were included in this study. Sixteen lesions (44.4%) were luminal A, four lesions (11.1%) were luminal B, 10 lesions (27.8%) were HER2, and six (16.7%) were basal-like subtypes. The presence of calcifications was associated with the HER2 subtype (p=0.024). Rim-enhancement on recombined images was associated with a basal-like subtype (p=0.001). Heterogeneous enhancement on recombined images was associated with non-basal-like breast cancer (p=0.027). No statistically significant correlation was found between other analyzed CEM imaging features and molecular subtypes.
CEM imaging features, including the presence of calcifications and certain internal enhancement patterns, were correlated with distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes and thus may further expand the role of CEM.
本研究旨在评估对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影(CEM)的影像特征与乳腺癌分子亚型之间的相关性。
这是一项对2019年12月至2023年8月期间接受CEM检查的患者进行的回顾性单机构研究。每位患者至少有1例经组织学证实的浸润性乳腺癌,并进行了粗针活检。排除有乳腺癌治疗史以及CEM图像未完全包含病变的患者。使用2022年发表的美国放射学会乳腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR BI-RADS)词典对CEM图像进行解读。分析了不同的影像特征,包括钙化的存在、结构扭曲、非肿块强化、肿块形态、内部强化模式、强化范围和病变清晰度。将分子亚型作为二分变量进行研究,包括腔面A型、腔面B型、HER2型和基底样型。采用Fisher精确检验分析影像特征与分子亚型之间的关联。当p值<0.05时认为具有统计学意义。
本研究共纳入31例患者的36个恶性病变。16个病变(44.4%)为腔面A型,4个病变(11.1%)为腔面B型,10个病变(27.8%)为HER2型,6个(16.7%)为基底样亚型。钙化的存在与HER2亚型相关(p = 0.024)。重组图像上的边缘强化与基底样亚型相关(p = 0.001)。重组图像上的不均匀强化与非基底样乳腺癌相关(p = 0.027)。在其他分析的CEM影像特征与分子亚型之间未发现统计学显著相关性。
CEM影像特征,包括钙化的存在和某些内部强化模式,与区分乳腺癌分子亚型相关,因此可能进一步扩大CEM的作用。