Suppr超能文献

临床治疗:肝动脉灌注化疗联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂与单纯肝动脉灌注化疗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效比较

Clinical Therapy: HAIC Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors versus HAIC Alone for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Liu Baokun, Shen Lujun, Liu Wen, Zhang Zhiyong, Lei Jieqiong, Li Zhengguo, Tan Qinquan, Huang Hengfei, Wang Xingdong, Fan Weijun

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Gansu Hospital, Lanzhou, 730050, People's Republic of China.

Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, 730050, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Aug 12;11:1557-1567. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S470345. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The majority of new diagnoses of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still pertain to unresectable cases. Currently, the combination therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has become the mainstream treatment. According to multiple clinical guidelines, it is strongly advised to consider local therapy as the primary treatment choice for uHCC. This research was conducted to examine the safety and effectiveness of combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors for the treatment of uHCC.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, 208 HCC patients received HAIC alone or HAIC in combination with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors. The overall survival(OS), and progression-free survival(PFS) and the best treatment response were compared between the two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM)was used to minimize confounding bias.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled patients, 116 patients (55.8%) received combination therapy, while 92 patients (44.2%) received HAIC alone. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. After PSM, 82 pairs of well-matched liver cancer patients were selected; the overall response rate in the combination group trended better than that in the HAIC alone group. The hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS of the combination approach compared to the HAIC-alone approach were 0.47 (95% CI, 0.322-0.687; p<0.001) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.397-0.848; p=0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSION

For uHCC patients, combination therapy can provide better OS and PFS compared to HAIC alone.

摘要

目的

大多数新诊断的肝细胞癌(HCC)仍属于不可切除病例。目前,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抑制剂的联合治疗已成为主流治疗方法。根据多项临床指南,强烈建议将局部治疗作为不可切除HCC的主要治疗选择。本研究旨在探讨肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合TKIs和PD-1抑制剂治疗不可切除HCC的安全性和有效性。

方法

2015年至2020年期间,208例HCC患者接受了单纯HAIC或HAIC联合TKIs和PD-1抑制剂治疗。比较了两个治疗组的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和最佳治疗反应。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少混杂偏倚。

结果

在入组患者中,116例患者(55.8%)接受了联合治疗,而92例患者(44.2%)接受了单纯HAIC治疗。两组的基线特征相似。PSM后,选择了82对匹配良好的肝癌患者;联合组的总缓解率趋势优于单纯HAIC组。联合治疗与单纯HAIC治疗相比,OS和PFS的风险比(HR)分别为0.47(95%CI,0.322-0.687;p<0.001)和0.58(95%CI,0.397-0.848;p=0.005)。

结论

对于不可切除HCC患者,联合治疗与单纯HAIC治疗相比可提供更好的OS和PFS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e434/11328844/26a1688bd5b3/JHC-11-1557-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验