Suppr超能文献

伊娃·奈克瑟斯-超声乳化性能研究。

EVA NEXUS-Phaco performance study.

作者信息

Feldhaus Lukas, Ohlmann Andreas, Kassumeh Stefan, Priglinger Siegfried, Mayer Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80336, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 18;17(8):1447-1452. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.08.09. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate a novel phacoemulsification system "EVA NEXUS" (D.O.R.C., Dutch Opthalmic Research Center) in comparison to the existing system "EVA" in clinical use. And to compare both phacoemulsification systems in terms of efficiency, safety and postoperative inflammatory activity.

METHODS

In this study standardized cataract surgery was performed on both eyes of the study participant, using the "EVA system" (control group, =20) on one eye and the "EVA NEXUS system" (intervention group, =20) on the other eye. Only patients with cataract LOCS Grading 1-3 and no accompanying eye diseases were included in this study. A total of 20 patients were included in this study, with each treatment arm including 20 eyes. During surgery a 0.1 mL aqueous humor sample was collected 1min after phacoemulsification to measure the total prostaglanin E2 concentrations using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The endothelial cell count, visual and refractive outcomes, and anterior chamber flare were evaluated preoperatively, and 1d, 1wk, and 3mo postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding intraoperative safety parameters including effective phacoemulsification time (=0.904), balanced saline solution flow (=0.701) and total surgery time (=0.565). Postoperative prostaglandin E2 levels, anterior chamber flare as well as endothelial cell loss tended to be lower in the NEXUS-Group, however not being statistically significant (=0.718; 0.164; 0.486). Both systems provided similar clinical outcomes, regarding best corrected visual acuity and refractive parameters, showing no statistically significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both systems show a high level of safety and efficency with similar results in terms of safety parameters including postoperative inflammatory activity and endothelial cell loss as well as visual and refractive outcomes. Although statistically not significant, the EVA NEXUS system tends to cause less postoperative inflammation with lower prostaglandin E2 levels and lower anterior chamber flare values.

摘要

目的

研究一种新型超声乳化系统“EVA NEXUS”(荷兰眼科研究中心D.O.R.C.),并与临床使用的现有系统“EVA”进行比较。同时比较两种超声乳化系统在效率、安全性和术后炎症活动方面的差异。

方法

在本研究中,对研究参与者的双眼进行标准化白内障手术,一只眼使用“EVA系统”(对照组,n = 20),另一只眼使用“EVA NEXUS系统”(干预组,n = 20)。本研究仅纳入白内障LOCS分级为1 - 3级且无伴发眼病的患者。本研究共纳入20例患者,每个治疗组包括20只眼。手术过程中,在超声乳化术后1分钟收集0.1 mL房水样本,采用酶联免疫吸附测定法测量前列腺素E2的总浓度。术前、术后1天、1周和3个月评估内皮细胞计数、视力和屈光结果以及前房闪光。

结果

两组在术中安全参数方面无统计学显著差异,包括有效超声乳化时间(P = 0.904)、平衡盐溶液流量(P = 0.701)和总手术时间(P = 0.

相似文献

1
EVA NEXUS-Phaco performance study.伊娃·奈克瑟斯-超声乳化性能研究。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 18;17(8):1447-1452. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.08.09. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraocular Pressure Control in Vitreoretinal Surgical Systems.玻璃体视网膜手术系统中的眼压控制
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 29;19:2047-2056. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S525285. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验