Suppr超能文献

在牧场饲养生猪对猪肉成分的影响极小。

Rearing hogs on pasture minimally impacts pork composition.

作者信息

Becker Chelsea, Campbell Jonathan, Soder Kathy, Hines Elizabeth A

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Jul 25;8:txae114. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae114. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Managing swine on pasture is increasing in popularity for both the consumer and producer. This interest appears to be driven by an effort to create an improved perception of environmentally sustainable practices and increased animal welfare, while keeping start-up costs low. However, evidence-based guidance on pasture management practices that support quality pork production and environmentally sustainable procedures is lacking. The objective of this work was to quantify the impact of pasture rearing on pig growth efficiency and pork quality. In this pilot study, 20 pigs similar in genetics, age, weight, and sex ratio were divided across indoor ( = 10) and Outdoor ( = 10) housing environments. Pigs were weighed every 14 d and harvested upon reaching an average weight of 113 kg. Average starting body weights were similar between both groups ( = 0.98). Carcass quality was evaluated by measuring pH, loin eye area (LEA), back fat (BF) thickness, subjective color and marbling scores, and colorimetry (CIE color space [*, *, *]) at the 10th rib. Final body weights at slaughter also showed no significant variation between housing groups ( = 0.98). No differences were observed in pork quality: pH 0 h ( = 0.53), 6 h ( = 0.29), 12 h ( = 0.80), and 24 h ( = 0.07) postmortem, LEA ( = 0.44), color ( = 0.73), and marbling ( = 0.40). However, hogs raised indoors had an increase in BF thickness ( = 0.04). Based on this pilot study, outdoor rearing conditions did not have significant impacts on pork quality. Further research will help to determine the impact that rearing scheme has on pH and BF.

摘要

对消费者和生产者来说,在牧场饲养猪的做法越来越受欢迎。这种兴趣似乎源于人们努力改善对环境可持续做法的认知并提高动物福利,同时保持较低的启动成本。然而,缺乏关于支持优质猪肉生产和环境可持续程序的牧场管理实践的循证指南。这项工作的目的是量化牧场饲养对猪生长效率和猪肉品质的影响。在这项初步研究中,将20头在遗传、年龄、体重和性别比例方面相似的猪分置于室内(n = 10)和室外(n = 10)饲养环境中。每14天对猪进行称重,当平均体重达到113千克时进行屠宰。两组的平均初始体重相似(P = 0.98)。通过测量第10肋处的pH值、眼肌面积(LEA)、背膘(BF)厚度、主观颜色和大理石纹评分以及比色法(CIE颜色空间[*, *, *])来评估胴体品质。屠宰时的最终体重在不同饲养组之间也没有显著差异(P = 0.98)。猪肉品质方面未观察到差异:宰后0小时(P = 0.53)、6小时(P = 0.29)、12小时(P = 0.80)和24小时(P = 0.07)的pH值,LEA(P = 0.44),颜色(P = 0.73)和大理石纹(P = 0.40)。然而,室内饲养的猪的BF厚度有所增加(P = 0.04)。基于这项初步研究,室外饲养条件对猪肉品质没有显著影响。进一步的研究将有助于确定饲养方案对pH值和BF的影响。

相似文献

1
Rearing hogs on pasture minimally impacts pork composition.在牧场饲养生猪对猪肉成分的影响极小。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Jul 25;8:txae114. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae114. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Pork Quality Traits According to Postmortem pH and Temperature in Berkshire.根据伯克夏猪宰后pH值和温度的猪肉品质性状
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2016;36(1):29-36. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.1.29. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验