Entler Kalie, Kruseman J Kaylin, Kennedy Sean M, Conway John E, Reyes Griffin J, Garrison J Craig, Bailey Lane B, Myers Natalie L
Rockets Sports Medicine Institute, Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 14;12(8):23259671241260084. doi: 10.1177/23259671241260084. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Differences in rotational range of motion (ROM) compared to humeral retrotorsion (HRT)-corrected rotational ROM exist in healthy baseball athletes, but it is unclear whether these differences exist in a pathological population.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine if there are disparities between objectively measured differences in ROM and HRT-corrected deficits in injured baseball players. It was hypothesized that disparities would exist between (1) the side-to-side difference in glenohumeral external rotation (GER) and the HRT-corrected glenohumeral external rotation deficit (GERD) and (2) the side-to-side difference in glenohumeral internal rotation (GIR) and the HRT-corrected glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD).
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Data from 172 baseball players with shoulder or elbow injuries (45 shoulder, 127 elbow) were reviewed in July 2023. GER and GIR were measured on the injured and noninjured sides of all players, and diagnostic ultrasound was used to measure HRT. Dependent tests were run to compare the side-to side differences in GER and GIR with the HRT-corrected GERD and GIRD, respectively.
In the players with a shoulder injury, there was a significant disparity between the side-to-side difference in GER and the HRT-corrected GERD (2°± 14° vs -13°± 15°, respectively) and between the side-to-side difference in GIR and the HRT-corrected GIRD (-14°± 8° vs 2°± 9°, respectively) ( < .001 for both). Similarly, players with an elbow injury had significant disparities between the side-to-side difference in GER and the HRT-corrected GERD (6°± 9° vs -10°± 9°, respectively) and between the side-to-side difference in GIR and the HRT-corrected GIRD (-12°± 8° vs 4°± 10°, respectively) ( < .001 for both).
The results supported our hypothesis that there were disparities between objectively measured differences in GER and GIR compared with the HRT-corrected GERD and GIRD in injured baseball players. Consideration must be given to osseous adaptations that occur at the glenohumeral joint when evaluating and treating this population.
健康的棒球运动员与肱骨后旋(HRT)校正后的旋转活动范围(ROM)相比,其旋转活动范围存在差异,但尚不清楚这些差异在病理人群中是否存在。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是确定受伤棒球运动员客观测量的ROM差异与HRT校正后的缺陷之间是否存在差异。假设在以下两者之间存在差异:(1)盂肱关节外旋(GER)的左右差异与HRT校正后的盂肱关节外旋缺陷(GERD);(2)盂肱关节内旋(GIR)的左右差异与HRT校正后的盂肱关节内旋缺陷(GIRD)。
横断面研究;证据等级,3级。
2023年7月回顾了172名肩部或肘部受伤的棒球运动员(45例肩部受伤,127例肘部受伤)的数据。测量了所有运动员受伤侧和未受伤侧的GER和GIR,并使用诊断超声测量HRT。分别进行相关检验,以比较GER和GIR的左右差异与HRT校正后的GERD和GIRD。
在肩部受伤的运动员中,GER的左右差异与HRT校正后的GERD之间存在显著差异(分别为2°±14°和-13°±15°),GIR的左右差异与HRT校正后的GIRD之间也存在显著差异(分别为-14°±8°和2°±9°)(两者均P<0.001)。同样,肘部受伤的运动员在GER的左右差异与HRT校正后的GERD之间存在显著差异(分别为6°±9°和-10°±9°),GIR的左右差异与HRT校正后的GIRD之间也存在显著差异(分别为-12°±8°和4°±10°)(两者均P<0.001)。
结果支持了我们的假设,即受伤棒球运动员客观测量的GER和GIR差异与HRT校正后的GERD和GIRD之间存在差异。在评估和治疗该人群时,必须考虑盂肱关节处发生的骨质适应情况。