Noonan Thomas J, Shanley Ellen, Bailey Lane B, Wyland Douglas J, Kissenberth Michael J, Hawkins Richard J, Thigpen Charles A
Steadman Hawkins Clinic Denver, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA.
Proaxis Therapy, Greenville, South Carolina, USA South Carolina Center for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Science, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1448-54. doi: 10.1177/0363546515575020. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
Dominant shoulder glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) has been associated with pitching arm injuries. The relationship of humeral torsion on development of GIRD is not clear.
Pitchers displaying GIRD will display greater humeral retrotorsion when compared with those without GIRD.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Humeral torsion and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were measured in 222 professional pitchers before spring training from 2009 to 2012. Shoulder external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) ROM were assessed in 90° of abduction with the scapula stabilized. Humeral torsion was measured via ultrasound using previously described and validated methods. Side-to-side differences in total arc of motion (ER + IR), ER, and IR ROM and humeral torsion were calculated as nondominant minus dominant arm measures for analysis. Pitchers were classified as having GIRD if their dominant arm displayed an IR deficit ≥15° concomitant with a total arc of motion deficit ≥10° compared with their nondominant arm. A mixed-model analysis of variance (side × GIRD) was used to compare dominant and nondominant humeral torsion between pitchers with GIRD (n = 60) and those without GIRD (n = 162). Independent t tests were used to compare the side-to-side difference in humeral torsion between pitchers with GIRD and those without GIRD (α = 0.05).
Pitchers with GIRD displayed significantly less humeral torsion (ie, greater retrotorsion) in their dominant arm as compared with those without GIRD (GIRD = 4.5° ± 11.8°, no GIRD = 10.4° ± 11.7°; P = .002). Pitchers with GIRD also displayed a greater side-to-side difference in humeral torsion (GIRD = 19.5° ± 11.9°, no GIRD = 12.3° ± 12.4°; P = .001). However, pitchers with GIRD did not display an increase in dominant ER ROM (dominant ER = 131.8° ± 14.3°, nondominant ER 126.6° ± 13.1°) when compared with those without GIRD (dominant ER = 132.0° ± 14.2°, nondominant ER 122.6° ± 13.1°; P = .03). Pitchers with GIRD displayed expected alterations in ROM (IR = 28.8° ± 9.6°, total arc = 160.6° ± 15.4°; P < .01 for both) when compared with those without GIRD (IR = 39.9° ± 9.9°, total arc = 171.2° ± 15.5°).
Pitchers with GIRD displayed greater side-to-side differences and dominant humeral retrotorsion as compared with those without GIRD. The greater humeral retrotorsion may place greater stress on the posterior shoulder resulting in ROM deficits. Pitchers with greater humeral retrotorsion appear to be more susceptible to developing ROM deficits associated with injury and may need increased monitoring and customized treatment programs to mitigate their increased injury risk.
优势肩盂肱关节内旋不足(GIRD)与投球手臂损伤有关。肱骨扭转在GIRD发展过程中的关系尚不清楚。
与无GIRD的投手相比,有GIRD的投手将表现出更大的肱骨后旋。
横断面研究;证据等级,3级。
在2009年至2012年春季训练前,对222名职业投手进行肱骨扭转和肩关节活动范围(ROM)测量。在肩胛骨稳定的情况下,于90°外展时评估肩关节外旋(ER)和内旋(IR)的ROM。使用先前描述并经验证的方法通过超声测量肱骨扭转。计算总活动弧(ER + IR)、ER和IR的ROM以及肱骨扭转的双侧差异,以非优势臂减去优势臂的测量值进行分析。如果优势臂的IR不足≥15°,且与非优势臂相比总活动弧不足≥10°,则将投手分类为患有GIRD。采用方差混合模型分析(侧别×GIRD)比较有GIRD的投手(n = 60)和无GIRD的投手(n = 162)之间优势侧和非优势侧的肱骨扭转情况。使用独立t检验比较有GIRD和无GIRD的投手之间肱骨扭转的双侧差异(α = 0.05)。
与无GIRD的投手相比,有GIRD的投手优势臂的肱骨扭转明显更少(即后旋更大)(GIRD = 4.5°±11.8°,无GIRD = 10.4°±11.7°;P = 0.002)。有GIRD的投手在肱骨扭转方面的双侧差异也更大(GIRD = 19.5°±11.9°,无GIRD = 12.3°±12.4°;P = 0.001)。然而,与无GIRD的投手相比(优势侧ER = 132.0°±14.2°,非优势侧ER 122.6°±13.1°;P = 0.03),有GIRD的投手优势侧ER的ROM并未增加(优势侧ER = 131.8°±14.3°,非优势侧ER 126.6°±13.1°)。与无GIRD的投手相比(IR = 39.9°±9.9°,总活动弧 = 171.2°±15.5°),有GIRD的投手表现出预期的ROM改变(IR = 28.8°±9.6°,总活动弧 = 160.6°±15.4°;两者P < 0.01)。
与无GIRD的投手相比,有GIRD的投手表现出更大的双侧差异和优势侧肱骨后旋。更大的肱骨后旋可能会给肩关节后方带来更大压力,导致ROM不足。肱骨后旋较大的投手似乎更容易出现与损伤相关的ROM不足,可能需要加强监测并制定个性化治疗方案,以降低其增加的受伤风险。