Suppr超能文献

使用CTL免疫斑点S6通用分析仪对聚焦减少中和试验(FRNT)进行验证,以快速滴定人类SARS-CoV-2中和抗体。

Validation of a focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) to rapidly titrate human SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies by using the CTL Immunospot S6 universal analyzer.

作者信息

Puglia Ilaria, Caporale Marialuigia, Casaccia Claudia, Valleriani Fabrizia, Salini Romolo, Berjaoui Shadia, Marfoglia Cristina, Ricci Lucilla, Lorusso Alessio

机构信息

PhD National Programme in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell' Abruzzo e Molise, Teramo, Italy.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 20;10(15):e34925. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34925. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

Abstract

In this paper we describe the validation of a focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) to quantitate human SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies by using the CTL Immunospot S6 Universal Analyzer. We employed a previously published protocol and compared its performances to a well-established and traditional serum-neutralization assay (SN). To assess diagnostic sensitivity, a total number of 201 human sera positive by SN for SARS-CoV-2 NAbs were processed: 196/201 tested positive by FRNT50 (97.51 %). A diagnostic specificity of 100 % was obtained by evaluating 206 negative serum samples. Repeatability of the test was evaluated by determining the intra and inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV). A standard deviation of 0.83 and a CV of 13 % were evidenced demonstrating an acceptable reproducibility of the assay. Moreover, a Cohen's Kappa of 0.975 was obtained proving an extremely high level of agreement between the FRNT protocol and the SN. Despite an acceptable correlation between methods (p < 0.05), FRNT demonstrated a statistically significant increase in NAbs titres compared to SN as well as higher data variability and asymmetry. These discrepancies could be attributed to FRNT sensitivity or most probably to the subjective interpretation of SN, although this aspect needs to be further investigated with a more representative number of samples. Basing on our results, it is reasonable to replace the SN with the FRNT assay as, with this, fast processing time (less than 2 days) and operator bias-free results registrations are guaranteed.

摘要

在本文中,我们描述了一种焦点减少中和试验(FRNT)的验证过程,该试验使用CTL免疫斑点S6通用分析仪对人抗SARS-CoV-2中和抗体进行定量。我们采用了先前发表的方案,并将其性能与一种成熟的传统血清中和试验(SN)进行了比较。为了评估诊断敏感性,对总共201份经SN检测为SARS-CoV-2中和抗体阳性的人血清进行了处理:其中196/201份经FRNT50检测呈阳性(97.51%)。通过评估206份阴性血清样本,获得了100%的诊断特异性。通过测定批内和批间变异系数(CV)来评估试验的重复性。结果显示标准差为0.83,CV为13%,表明该试验具有可接受的重复性。此外,Cohen's Kappa值为0.975,证明FRNT方案与SN之间具有极高的一致性水平。尽管两种方法之间存在可接受的相关性(p < 0.05),但与SN相比,FRNT显示中和抗体滴度有统计学上的显著增加,以及更高的数据变异性和不对称性。这些差异可能归因于FRNT的敏感性,或者很可能是由于SN的主观解读,尽管这方面需要用更具代表性数量的样本进一步研究。基于我们的结果,用FRNT试验取代SN是合理的,因为这样可以保证快速的处理时间(少于2天)和无操作员偏差的结果记录。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/358f/11327567/b1b5af05fc89/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验