Hasan Nada, Rizk Chadia, Marzooq Fatema, Khan Khalid, AlKhaja Maryam, Babikir Esameldeen
University of Bahrain, Environment and Sustainable Development Program, College of Science, Zallaq, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Salmaniya Medical Complex, Department of Radiology, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Jul;11(4):043502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.043502. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
We aim to develop modified clinical indication (CI)-based image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for assessing image quality (IQ) and establishing acceptable quality doses (AQDs) in adult computed tomography (CT) examinations, based on CIs and patient sizes.
CT images, volume CT dose index ( ), and dose length product (DLP) were collected retrospectively between September 2020 and September 2021 for eight common CIs from two CT scanners at a central hospital in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Using the modified CI-based IQSC and a Likert scale (0 to 4), three radiologists assessed the IQ of each examination. AQDs were then established as the median value of and DLP for images with an average score of 3 and compared to national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs).
Out of 581 examinations, 60 were excluded from the study due to average scores above or below 3. The established AQDs were lower than the NDRLs for all CIs, except for oncologic follow-up for large patients (28 versus 26 mGy) in scanner A, besides abdominal pain for medium patients (16 versus 15 mGy) and large patients (34 versus 27 mGy), and diverticulitis/appendicitis for medium patients (15 versus 12 mGy) and large patients (33 versus 30 mGy) in scanner B, indicating the need for optimization.
CI-based IQSC is crucial for IQ assessment and establishing AQDs according to patient size. It identifies stations requiring optimization of patient radiation exposure.
我们旨在制定基于修正临床指征(CI)的图像质量评分标准(IQSC),用于评估成人计算机断层扫描(CT)检查中的图像质量(IQ),并根据临床指征和患者体型确定可接受的质量剂量(AQD)。
回顾性收集2020年9月至2021年9月间巴林王国一家中心医院两台CT扫描仪针对8种常见临床指征的CT图像、容积CT剂量指数( )和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。三位放射科医生使用基于修正临床指征的IQSC和李克特量表(0至4)评估每次检查的图像质量。然后将平均得分为3的图像的 和DLP的中位数确定为AQD,并与国家诊断参考水平(NDRL)进行比较。
在581次检查中,有60次因平均得分高于或低于3而被排除在研究之外。除了扫描仪A中大型患者的肿瘤学随访(28对26 mGy)、扫描仪B中中型患者的腹痛(16对15 mGy)和大型患者(34对27 mGy)以及扫描仪B中中型患者的憩室炎/阑尾炎(15对12 mGy)和大型患者(33对30 mGy)外,所有临床指征的既定AQD均低于NDRL,这表明需要进行优化。
基于临床指征的IQSC对于图像质量评估和根据患者体型确定AQD至关重要。它可识别需要优化患者辐射暴露的部位。