Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e7458. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7458.
This study aimed to verify if intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can achieve the same survival outcome as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and to explore the suitable candidates that can safely receive IORT after BCS.
Eligible post-BCS patients who received IORT or EBRT were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2018. Risk factors that affected 5-year overall survival (OS) or breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Clinical characteristics, OS, and BCSS were comparatively analyzed between the two treatment modalities.
The survival analysis after propensity score matching confirmed that patients who received IORT (n = 2200) had a better 5-year OS than those who received EBRT (n = 2200) (p = 0.015). However, the two groups did not differ significantly in 5-year BCSS (p = 0.381). This feature persisted even after multivariate analyses that took into account numerous clinical characteristics. Although there was no significant difference in BCSS between different subgroups of patients treated with IORT or EBRT, patients over 55 years of age, with T1, N0, non-triple negative breast cancers, hormone receptor-positive, and histologic grade II showed a better OS after receiving IORT.
In low-risk, early-stage breast cancer, IORT was not inferior to EBRT considering 5-year BCSS and OS. Considering the equivalent clinical outcome but less radiotoxicity, IORT might be a reasonable alternative to EBRT in highly selective patients undergoing BCS.
本研究旨在验证保乳手术后(BCS)术中放疗(IORT)是否能达到与全乳外照射放疗(EBRT)相同的早期乳腺癌生存结局,并探讨可安全接受 BCS 后 IORT 的合适患者。
从 2010 年至 2018 年,将在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中接受 IORT 或 EBRT 的 BCS 后合格患者纳入研究。通过 Cox 比例风险回归分析确定影响 5 年总生存(OS)或乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)的风险因素。比较两种治疗方式的临床特征、OS 和 BCSS。
倾向性评分匹配后的生存分析证实,接受 IORT(n=2200)的患者 5 年 OS 优于接受 EBRT(n=2200)的患者(p=0.015)。然而,两组在 5 年 BCSS 方面无显著差异(p=0.381)。即使在考虑了许多临床特征的多变量分析后,这种特征仍然存在。尽管接受 IORT 或 EBRT 治疗的不同亚组患者之间在 BCSS 方面无显著差异,但 55 岁以上、T1、N0、非三阴性乳腺癌、激素受体阳性和组织学分级 II 的患者,接受 IORT 后 OS 更好。
在低风险、早期乳腺癌中,考虑到 5 年 BCSS 和 OS,IORT 并不逊于 EBRT。考虑到等效的临床结果但放射毒性较小,IORT 可能是高度选择的 BCS 患者 EBRT 的合理替代方案。