Lai Xiaolian, Han Wei, Zhang Hanqun, Hou Jing, Wang Guanghui, Luo Xiaoqing, Li Xin, Wang Qi, Zhang Yi, Wang Hua, Li Yong
Guizhou University Medical College, Guiyang, China.
Department of Central Laboratory, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Gland Surg. 2022 May;11(5):847-859. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-235.
Previous research suggested that radiotherapy (RT) had a small absolute benefit in patients with low-risk breast cancer over the age of 65. To reduce the patient's treatment burden and cost, as well as the damage to normal tissue, this study sought to explore the prognostic role of RT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly patients.
Patients who were aged ≥65 years, stage T1N0M0, and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive (ER/PR) were included in this study. Age, marital status, histology, race, grade, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), subtype, treatment method, and survival were also collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. We compared overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in the patients who underwent BCS with or without RT. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used in our study.
The data of 3,623 patients were analyzed in this study. Among them, 2,851 (78.69%) patients had received RT. The multivariate analyses before PSM showed that RT resulted in better OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.62, P<0.001], and BCSS (HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27-0.58, P<0.001). The multivariate analyses after PSM (n=1,538) confirmed that patients who received RT (n=769) had a longer survival time than those who did not (n=769) (OS: HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, P=0.018; and BCSS: HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.93, P=0.025). The survival analysis showed that patients receiving RT had a better OS (P=0.028) and BCSS (P=0.016) than those who did not receive RT. However, there were no significant differences in patients' OS and BCSS with or without RT across the different age subgroups (P>0.05).
In our study, patients who received RT had a longer survival time. However, the age subgroup analysis showed that RT did not have any survival benefit in elderly patients with T1N0M0 and ER/PR breast cancer. Furthermore, at the age of 65-69 years, the P value for OS approached 0.05, which suggests that the decision to administer RT in this patient group should be made based on each patient's condition.
先前的研究表明,放射治疗(RT)对65岁以上低风险乳腺癌患者有较小的绝对益处。为了减轻患者的治疗负担和成本,以及减少对正常组织的损伤,本研究旨在探讨保乳手术(BCS)后放疗在老年患者中的预后作用。
本研究纳入年龄≥65岁、T1N0M0期且雌激素受体/孕激素受体阳性(ER/PR)的患者。还从2004年至2015年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中收集了年龄、婚姻状况、组织学、种族、分级、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、亚型、治疗方法和生存情况。我们比较了接受或未接受放疗的BCS患者在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的总生存期(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)。本研究采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归分析。
本研究分析了3623例患者的数据。其中,2851例(78.69%)患者接受了放疗。PSM前的多因素分析显示,放疗可带来更好的OS [风险比(HR)0.51,95%置信区间(CI):0.42 - 0.62,P<0.001]和BCSS(HR 0.40,95% CI:0.27 - 0.58,P<0.001)。PSM后的多因素分析(n = 1538)证实,接受放疗的患者(n = 769)比未接受放疗的患者(n = 769)生存时间更长(OS:HR 0.73,95% CI:0.57 - 0.95,P = 0.018;BCSS:HR 0.57,95% CI:0.35 - 0.93,P = 0.025)。生存分析显示,接受放疗的患者比未接受放疗的患者有更好的OS(P = 0.028)和BCSS(P = 0.016)。然而,不同年龄亚组中接受或未接受放疗的患者在OS和BCSS方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。
在我们的研究中,接受放疗的患者生存时间更长。然而,年龄亚组分析显示,放疗对T1N0M0和ER/PR乳腺癌老年患者没有任何生存益处。此外,在65 - 69岁时,OS的P值接近0.05,这表明该患者组放疗决策应根据每个患者的情况做出。