• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据不同的血管活性策略治疗小儿难治性脓毒性休克的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC FLUID-REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VASOACTIVE STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

机构信息

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Shock. 2024 Nov 1;62(5):599-611. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002427. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002427
PMID:39158574
Abstract

Background: Hemodynamic support using vasoactive agents is a mainstay in the management of patients with pediatric fluid-refractory septic shock (FRSS). However, evidence supporting the appropriate choice of vasoactive agent is limited. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of different first-line vasoactive strategies on mortality in pediatric FRSS. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the ISRCTN registry were searched up until December 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies reporting vasoactive agent-specific outcomes of children with FRSS were included. Mortality was assessed as primary outcome in studies on patients receiving dopamine, epinephrine, or norepinephrine as first-line. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Prevalence ratio (PR) estimates were calculated between two drugs when was available in the same study. Findings: Of the 26,284 identified articles, 13 were included, for a total of 997 children. Twelve studies included 748 patients receiving a single vasoactive agent. Of these, 361 received dopamine, 271 epinephrine, and 116 norepinephrine. Overall pooled mortality for patients receiving a single vasoactive was 12% (95% CI 6%-21%) of which 11% (95% CI 3%-36%) for patients receiving dopamine, 17% (95% CI 6%-37%) for epinephrine, and 7% (95% CI 1%-48%) for norepinephrine. Four first-line dopamine (176 patients) and first-line epinephrine (142 patients): dopamine showed a tendency toward higher mortality (PR 1.38, 95% CI 0.81-2.38) and a significant higher need for mechanical ventilation (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22). Interpretation: Among children with FRSS receiving a single vasoactive agent, norepinephrine was associated with the lowest mortality rate. Comparing dopamine and epinephrine, patients receiving epinephrine needed less mechanical ventilation and showed a trend for lower mortality rate. Further research is needed to better delineate the first-line vasoactive agent in this population.

摘要

背景

在儿童脓毒性休克伴液体难治性(FRSS)的治疗中,使用血管活性药物进行血流动力学支持是主要方法。然而,支持选择合适的血管活性药物的证据有限。本研究旨在对不同一线血管活性策略对儿科 FRSS 患者死亡率的影响进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ISRCTN 注册中心截至 2023 年 12 月的数据。纳入报告 FRSS 患儿使用特定血管活性药物的结局的随机对照试验和观察性队列研究。研究中接受多巴胺、肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素作为一线治疗的患者,以死亡率作为主要结局。进行了随机效应荟萃分析。当同一研究中存在两种药物时,计算了两者之间的患病率比(PR)估计值。

结果

在 26284 篇文章中,有 13 篇被纳入,共纳入 997 名儿童。12 项研究纳入了 12 名接受单一血管活性药物治疗的患者。其中,361 名患者接受多巴胺,271 名患者接受肾上腺素,116 名患者接受去甲肾上腺素。接受单一血管活性药物治疗的患者的总体死亡率为 12%(95%CI 6%-21%),其中接受多巴胺的患者死亡率为 11%(95%CI 3%-36%),接受肾上腺素的患者死亡率为 17%(95%CI 6%-37%),接受去甲肾上腺素的患者死亡率为 7%(95%CI 1%-48%)。在 4 项一线多巴胺(176 名患者)和一线肾上腺素(142 名患者)的研究中:多巴胺的死亡率有升高的趋势(PR 1.38,95%CI 0.81-2.38),需要机械通气的比例也显著更高(PR 1.12,95%CI 1.02-1.22)。

结论

在接受单一血管活性药物治疗的 FRSS 患儿中,去甲肾上腺素与最低的死亡率相关。与肾上腺素相比,接受肾上腺素的患者需要更少的机械通气,死亡率也有降低的趋势。需要进一步的研究来更好地确定该人群的一线血管活性药物。

相似文献

1
OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC FLUID-REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VASOACTIVE STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.根据不同的血管活性策略治疗小儿难治性脓毒性休克的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Shock. 2024 Nov 1;62(5):599-611. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002427. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Epinephrine vs Norepinephrine as Initial Treatment in Children With Septic Shock.肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素作为儿童感染性休克初始治疗的比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254720. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4720.
3
THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.血管加压药治疗脓毒性休克患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Shock. 2023 Dec 1;60(6):746-752. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
Norepinephrine or dopamine for septic shock: systematic review of randomized clinical trials.去甲肾上腺素或多巴胺治疗脓毒性休克:随机临床试验的系统评价。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):172-8. doi: 10.1177/0885066610396312. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.用于低血压性休克的血管升压药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD003709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub3.
9
Norepinephrine versus Dopamine for Septic Shock in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Pediatr. 2025 Jul;282:114599. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114599. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
10
Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管升压药治疗感染性休克:系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 3;10(8):e0129305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129305. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Epinephrine vs Norepinephrine as Initial Treatment in Children With Septic Shock.肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素作为儿童感染性休克初始治疗的比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254720. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4720.