School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Behavioral, Sexual, and Global Health Lab, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0289994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289994. eCollection 2024.
Among adolescents, HIV/AIDs remains a significant cause of death globally [1-4]. Given the unique stages in human development, adolescents have been shown to fall within a sexually active phase. Combined with other social and structural factors in their immediate environments, HIV prevention and care among adolescents can be filled with challenges for intervention. This paper outlines this protocol to systematically review peer-reviewed literature in prevention and care among adolescents 10-19 years. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to report this scoping review. The review will involve screening and extracting data using covidence as the primary tool. The review will encompass quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, utilizing a search strategy from electronic databases such as PubMed (NCBI), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), Embase (Elsevier), and Scopus (Elsevier). Additionally, a search will be conducted for grey literature using Global Index Medicus (WHO), MedNar (Deep Web Technologies), and Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane). Duplicate removal and selection of articles that meet the inclusion criteria for the study will be performed using Covidence. Once the screening process is complete, data will be extracted from the full-text screened articles in Covidence. We will pilot the extracted data in Covidence to ensure that all relevant information has been captured, making necessary changes if required. Data extraction will be carried out by at least two authors, with any conflicts resolved by the same authors. If a conflict cannot be resolved between the two, a third author will make a final determination. We aim to analyze data thematically by employing a grounded theory approach to generate codes pertinent to the research question. The team will review and discuss codes to create a cohesive set of codes that will be instrumental in identifying knowledge gaps and constructing themes that summarize the data. The proposed systematic review will be among the pioneering efforts to rigorously assess global data on HIV prevention and care, with a specific focus on adolescents 10-19 years. It will consider the diverse socio-economic factors and experiences shaping these adolescents' lives in HIV prevention and care. We expect this review to yield critical insights into the present landscape of HIV prevention and care for individuals aged 10-19. These findings will also play a pivotal role in shaping the development of a global framework that researchers and stakeholders can readily adopt and implement across socio-economic contexts. This framework will aim to address the unique needs of all adolescents concerning HIV prevention and care.
在青少年中，艾滋病毒/艾滋病仍然是全球范围内的一个主要死亡原因[1-4]。鉴于人类发展的独特阶段，青少年已经进入了性活跃期。再加上他们所处的直接环境中的其他社会和结构因素，青少年的艾滋病毒预防和护理可能充满了干预的挑战。本文概述了这一方案，旨在系统地综述 10-19 岁青少年预防和护理方面的同行评议文献。将使用《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目扩展范围综述报告指南》（PRISMA-ScR）来报告这一范围综述。审查将使用 covidence 作为主要工具进行筛选和提取数据。该审查将包括定量、定性和混合方法研究，利用来自电子数据库（如 PubMed（NCBI）、Web of Science 核心合集（Clarivate）、Embase（Elsevier）和 Scopus（Elsevier））的搜索策略。此外，还将使用全球医学索引（世卫组织）、MedNar（深网技术）和对照试验注册中心（考科兰）对灰色文献进行搜索。使用 Covidence 进行重复项删除和选择符合研究纳入标准的文章。筛选过程完成后，将从 Covidence 筛选出的全文文章中提取数据。我们将在 Covidence 中试用提取的数据，以确保已捕获所有相关信息，如果需要，将进行必要的更改。数据提取将由至少两名作者进行，如果作者之间存在冲突，则由同一作者解决。如果两名作者之间无法解决冲突，则由第三名作者做出最终决定。我们旨在通过运用扎根理论方法对数据进行主题分析，以生成与研究问题相关的代码。该团队将审查和讨论代码，以创建一组连贯的代码，这些代码将有助于确定知识空白，并构建总结数据的主题。这项系统综述将是严格评估全球艾滋病毒预防和护理数据的开创性努力之一，特别关注 10-19 岁的青少年。它将考虑影响这些青少年艾滋病毒预防和护理生活的各种社会经济因素和经验。我们预计这项综述将为了解 10-19 岁个体的艾滋病毒预防和护理现状提供重要见解。这些发现还将在制定一个全球框架方面发挥关键作用，研究人员和利益攸关方可以在社会经济背景下轻松采用和实施该框架。该框架旨在满足所有青少年在艾滋病毒预防和护理方面的独特需求。
