• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究:在拉丁美洲和加勒比国家评估适合大流行的放射治疗创新 (CLARO PARTE)。

Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated (CLARO PARTE) for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.

Division of Radiation Oncology, Liga Contra El Cáncer, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Aug;10:e2400051. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00051.

DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00051
PMID:
39159409
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and rank suitable safety innovations developed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) radiation oncology centers.

METHODS

We conducted a multimodal participatory engagement collaboration with the Latin-American and Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology. The study consisted of four phases. Innovations were collected from a panel of radiotherapy experts representing a diverse group of 11 countries from LAC (Phase I). Next, a medical scientific team compared the innovations against international standards regarding their potential impact on risk of infection, clinical operation, and continuity of quality cancer care (Phase II). Their findings were supplied to the country representatives who rated the innovations for acceptability in their cancer centers (Phase III), resulting in a final report of the panel's recommendations (Phase IV).

RESULTS

A total of 81 innovations were reported by the country representatives and merged by the medical scientific team into 24 innovations that combined similar innovations. The 24 innovations were grouped into six categories including practices aimed at (1) reducing clinic crowding (n = 3), (2) increasing screening and vaccinations for COVID-19 disease (n = 5), (3) implementing social distancing (n = 6), (4) strengthening personal infection equipment and disinfection (n = 6), (5) avoiding delaying or shortening treatment protocols (n = 2), and (6) mixed procedures (n = 2). The medical scientific team found nearly all innovations were supported by international recommendations and rated as safe, efficient, and acceptable.

CONCLUSION

By using the lessons learned from the Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated study, a manual of scalable practices in radiation oncology clinics may be developed to guide actions during future large-scale public health crises in low- and middle-income countries of LAC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在识别、评估和对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)放射肿瘤学中心在 COVID-19 大流行期间开发的安全创新进行排名。

方法

我们与拉丁美洲和加勒比医学肿瘤学会进行了多模式参与式合作。该研究包括四个阶段。创新是由代表来自 LAC 的 11 个国家的多样化小组的放射治疗专家小组收集的(第一阶段)。接下来,一个医学科学团队将这些创新与国际标准进行比较,以评估其对感染风险、临床操作和癌症护理质量连续性的潜在影响(第二阶段)。他们的发现提供给国家代表,由他们对其癌症中心的创新进行可接受性评估(第三阶段),从而得出小组建议的最终报告(第四阶段)。

结果

国家代表共报告了 81 项创新,医学科学团队将这些创新合并为 24 项创新,这些创新合并了类似的创新。这 24 项创新分为六个类别,包括旨在(1)减少诊所拥挤的措施(n = 3)、(2)增加 COVID-19 疾病的筛查和疫苗接种(n = 5)、(3)实施社会距离(n = 6)、(4)加强个人感染设备和消毒(n = 6)、(5)避免延迟或缩短治疗方案(n = 2)和(6)混合程序(n = 2)。医学科学团队发现几乎所有的创新都得到了国际建议的支持,并被评为安全、高效和可接受的。

结论

通过利用社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究:评估适合大流行的放射治疗创新研究中的经验教训,可能会开发出一份放射肿瘤学诊所可扩展实践手册,以指导中低收入国家在未来的大规模公共卫生危机期间采取行动。

相似文献

1
Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated (CLARO PARTE) for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries.社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究:在拉丁美洲和加勒比国家评估适合大流行的放射治疗创新 (CLARO PARTE)。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Aug;10:e2400051. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00051.
2
Risks of low vaccination coverage and strategies to prevent the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases in infants in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario: recommendations for Latin America and the Caribbean by the group of experts on infant immunization for Latin America.在 COVID-19 大流行背景下,低疫苗接种率的风险及预防婴儿疫苗可预防疾病死灰复燃的策略:拉丁美洲和加勒比婴儿免疫专家组的建议。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):1091-1101. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2271057. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
HIV and COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的艾滋病毒和 COVID-19。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022 Feb;19(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11904-021-00589-4. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action for health systems in Latin America to strengthen quality of care.COVID-19 大流行:呼吁拉丁美洲卫生系统采取行动,加强医疗质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 5;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa062.
5
Implementation of a COVID-19 Genomic Surveillance Regional Network for Latin America and Caribbean region.实施拉丁美洲和加勒比区域 COVID-19 基因组监测区域网络。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0252526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252526. eCollection 2022.
6
Updated Surveillance Metrics and History of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020-2023) in Latin America and the Caribbean: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区 COVID-19 大流行(2020-2023 年)的更新监测指标和历史:纵向趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 17;10:e44398. doi: 10.2196/44398.
7
Scientific and technological contributions of Latin America and Caribbean countries to the Zika virus outbreak.拉丁美洲和加勒比国家对寨卡病毒爆发的科技贡献。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 9;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6842-x.
8
Latin America and the Caribbean SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区 SARS-CoV-2 监测:纵向趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 27;7(4):e25728. doi: 10.2196/25728.
9
Managing patient flows in radiation oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic : Reworking existing treatment designs to prevent infections at a German hot spot area University Hospital.管理 COVID-19 大流行期间放射肿瘤学中的患者流:对现有治疗设计进行重新设计,以防止德国热点地区大学医院发生感染。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Dec;196(12):1080-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01698-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Breast cancer in Latin America: experts perceptions compared with medical care standards.拉丁美洲的乳腺癌:专家观点与医疗保健标准比较。
Breast. 2010 Feb;19(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 28.